| Literature DB >> 28841187 |
Anna Szczurek1, Michał Barcikowski2, Karol Leluk3, Bartosz Babiarczuk4, Jerzy Kaleta5, Justyna Krzak6.
Abstract
The modification of carbon fibers for improving adhesion between fibers and an epoxy resin in composite materials has become the focus of attention. In this work the carbon fiber coating process has been devised in a way preventing the stiffening and clumping of fibers. To improve interactions between coated fibers and a resin in composites, four types of silica coatings with different organic functional groups (3-aminopropyl-coating 1, 3-mercaptopropyl-coating 2, 2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl) ethyl-coating 3, methyl-coating 4) were obtained. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to distinguish the changes of a carbon fibers surface after coating deposition. The thickness of the obtained coatings, including the diversity of thickness, was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The increase in surface free energy (SFE) of modified fibers, including the distinction between the polar and dispersive parts, was examined by wettability measurements using a tensometric test. The developed coating preparation process allowed to cover fibers separately with nanoscale silica layers, which changed their morphology. The introduction of organic functional groups resulted in surface free energy changes, especially an increase in specific polar surface energy components.Entities:
Keywords: adhesion; composite; silica; thin layer; wettability
Year: 2017 PMID: 28841187 PMCID: PMC5615645 DOI: 10.3390/ma10090990
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Scheme of carbon fiber surface functionalization by the sol-gel coatings (with numbers compatible with numbers of coatings described in manuscript).
Figure 2SEM micrographs of uncoated carbon fibers (a) and carbon fibers modified with coating 1 (b); coating 2 (c); coating 3 (d); and coating 4 (e).
Figure 3AFM images of uncoated and coated carbon fibers in 3D mode: carbon fibers without coating (a); and carbon fibers modified with coating 1 (b); coating 2 (c); coating 3 (d); and coating 4 (e).
Figure 4AFM images of uncoated and coated carbon fibers in 2D derivative mode: carbon fibers without coating (a); and carbon fibers modified with coating 1 (b); coating 2 (c); coating 3 (d); and coating 4 (e).
Figure 5TEM images of uncoated carbon fibers (a) and carbon fibers modified with coating 1 (b) coating 2 (c); coating 3 (d); and coating 4 (e).
Figure 6Histograms of measured thickness of coating 1(a); coating 2 (b); coating 3 (c); and coating 4 (d).
Figure 7EDS results for carbon fibers without coating and with coating 2.
Figure 8FTIR spectra of the powder obtained from sols used to coating preparation (1: powder from sol used to prepare coating 1; 2: powder from sol used to prepare coating 2; and 4: powder from sol used to prepare coating 4).
Figure 9Surface free energy of fibers.
Polar character of fibers without and with individual coatings.
| Sample | % Polarity |
|---|---|
| without coating | 5.1 |
| coating 1 | 16.1 |
| coating 2 | 14.9 |
| coating 3 | 19.7 |
| coating 4 | 19.2 |
Molar ratios of reagents for obtained sols.
| Sol | Organically Functionalized Precursor | TMOS | Alcohol | HCl |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 10.6 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0.3 | 7.9 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 1 | 0.5 | 12.1 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 1 | 0.2 | 6.1 | 0.1 |