| Literature DB >> 28841170 |
Tingting Wu1,2, Xiangyang Bi3, Zhonggen Li4, Guangyi Sun5, Xinbin Feng6, Lihai Shang7, Hua Zhang8, Tianrong He9, Ji Chen10,11.
Abstract
To investigate the impact of artisanal zinc smelting activities (AZSA) on the distribution and enrichment of trace metal(loid)s in street dust of a small city in Guizhou province, SW China, street dust samples were collected and analyzed for 10 trace metal(loid)s (Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, Sb, Pb, and Hg). Meanwhile, the health risks of local resident exposed to street dust were assessed. The result showed that the average concentrations of 10 elements were Zn (1039 mg kg-1), Pb (423 mg kg-1), Cr (119 mg kg-1), Cu (99 mg kg-1), As (55 mg kg-1), Ni (39 mg kg-1), Co (18 mg kg-1), Sb (7.6 mg kg-1), Cd (2.6 mg kg-1), and Hg (0.22 mg kg-1). Except Ni, Co, and Cr, other elements in street dust were obviously elevated compared to the provincial soil background. Pb, Zn, Cd, Sb, and Cu were at heavy to moderate contamination status, especially Pb and Zn, with maximums of 1723 and 708 mg kg-1, respectively; As and Hg were slightly contaminated; while Cr, Ni, and Co were at un-contaminated levels. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed AZSA contributed to the increase of Pb, Zn, Cd, Sb, As, and Hg, while, natural sources introduced Ni, Co, Cr, and Cu. The health risk assessment disclosed that children had higher non-carcinogenic risk than those found in adults, and As has hazardous index (HI) higher than 1 both for children and adults, while Pb and Cr only had HIs higher than 1 for children, other elements were relatively safe. For carcinogenic risks, the major concern was As, then a lesser concern for Cr. The study showed that although the scale of AZSA was small, the contamination of heavy metal(loid)s in street dust and associated health risks were severe.Entities:
Keywords: Zn smelting activities; contamination assessment; health risk assessment; heavy metal(loid); street dust
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28841170 PMCID: PMC5615498 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14090961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sketch map showing the study area and the street dust sampling sites.
Values and factors used for non-carcinogenic hazard health risk assessment.
| Parameter | Physical Meaning | Unit | Children | Adults | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration of trace element in street dust | mg kg−1 | 95% UCL | 95% UCL | This study | |
| Ingestion rate | mg day−1 | 200 | 100 | [ | |
| Inhalation rate | m3 day−1 | 5 | 20 | [ | |
| Exposure frequency | day year−1 | 350 | 350 | [ | |
| Exposure duration | year | 6 | 30 | [ | |
| Exposed skin area | cm2 | 1800 | 5000 | [ | |
| Adherence factor | mg cm2 | 1 | 1 | [ | |
| Dermal absorption factor | - | 0.03 for arsenic; | 0.03 for arsenic; | [ | |
| Particle emission factor | m3 kg−1 | 1.32 × 109 | 1.32 × 109 | [ | |
| Average body weight | kg | 15 | 55.9 | [ | |
| Averaging time | day | 365 | 365 | [ |
Note: 95% UCL indicates “the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the mean”.
95% UCL (mg kg−1) of heavy metal(loid)s in streets of Hezhang city and the RfD (mg kg−1 day−1) and SF (mg kg−1 day−1).
| Parameter | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Sb | Pb | Hg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 19 | 44 | 230 | 1080 | 62 | 3.5 | 8.1 | 461 | 0.33 | |
| 3 × 10−3 | 2 × 10−2 | 2 × 10−2 | 4 × 10−2 | 0.3 | 3 × 10−4 | 0.001 | 4 × 10−4 | 3.5 × 10−3 | 3 × 10−4 | |
| 2.86 × 10−5 | 5.71 × 10−6 | 2.06 × 10−2 | 4.02 × 10−2 | 0.3 | 3 × 10−4 | 0.001 | 4 × 10−4 | 3.52 × 10−3 | 8.57 × 10−5 | |
| 6 × 10−5 | 1.6 × 10−2 | 5.4 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−2 | 0.06 | 1.23 × 10−4 | 1 × 10−5 | 8 × 10−6 | 5.25 × 10−4 | 2.1 × 10−5 | |
| SFing | 1.50 | |||||||||
| SFdermal | 3.66 | |||||||||
| SFinh | 42 | 9.80 | 0.84 | 15.1 | 6.30 |
Descriptive statics of trace metal(loid)s, pH and OM in street dust of Hezhang city (n = 30) and soils and limestones in Guizhou province.
| Parameters | Min | Max | AM | SD | Med | Skew | CV | LAS | RGS | PBG | CS | EF | LS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 72 | 509 | 133 | 76 | 119 | 4.3 | 57 | 228 | 103 | 95.9 | 91.9 | 1.24 | 4 |
| Co | 11 | 30 | 18 | 4 | 18 | 1.0 | 21 | 43 | 41 | 19.2 | 10.5 | 0.94 | 16 |
| Ni | 27 | 68 | 41 | 9 | 39 | 1.4 | 23 | 86 | 76 | 39.1 | 28.1 | 1.00 | 89 |
| Cu | 48 | 1212 | 153 | 207 | 99 | 4.9 | 136 | 133 | 189 | 32.0 | 75.0 | 3.09 | 3 |
| Zn | 468 | 1723 | 966 | 307 | 1039 | 0.3 | 32 | 611 | 160 | 99.5 | 157.1 | 10.44 | 2 |
| As | 36 | 82 | 58 | 11 | 55 | 0.3 | 18 | 23 | 5 | 20.0 | 24.8 | 2.75 | 3 |
| Cd | 1.3 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 0.77 | 44 | 8.3 | 0.7 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 3.94 | 0.0 |
| Sb | 3.4 | 11.4 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 25 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.28 | 3.45 | 0.0 |
| Pb | 183 | 708 | 409 | 139 | 423 | 0.4 | 34 | 181 | 86 | 35.2 | 47.3 | 12.02 | 1 |
| Hg | 0.08 | 0.89 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 2.8 | 57 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.38 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| pH | 7.3 | 9.7 | 8.5 | 0.6 | 8.5 | −0.1 | 7 | 5.9 | 5.07 | 6.2 | 8.03 | 1.37 | - |
| OM | 1.9 | 9.6 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 31 | 3.70 | 3.53 | 4.26 | 4.97 | 1.10 | - |
Note: Units in mg kg−1 for trace metal(loid), % for OM, unitless for pH; Min, minimum; Max, Maximum; AM, arithmetical mean; Med, median; Skew, skewness; SD, arithmetical standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation; LAS, mean of local agricultural soils (n = 23, this study); RGS: Regional grassland soil (n = 6); PBG, provincial background of surface soil in Guizhou [22]; CS, mean of control sites in Huaxi district of Guiyang; EF, enrichment factor = median/background of surface soil in Guizhou province; LS, mean of limestones in Guizhou (n = 3, this study); OM, organic matter.
Comparison of trace metal(loid)s in street dust of different cities in the world (unit in mg kg−1, dry weight).
| City | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Sb | Pb | Hg | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hezhang, China | 119 | 18 | 39 | 99 | 1039 | 55 | 2.6 | 7.6 | 423 | 0.22 | This study |
| Zhuzhou, China | 115 | 13 | 35 | 98 | 1140 | 42 | 10.3 | 9.8 | 254 | 0.21 | [ |
| Huludao, China | 162 | 1374 | 19.7 | 235 | 0.61 | [ | |||||
| Avile’s, Spain | 42 | 7 | 28 | 183 | 4892 | 17 | 22.3 | 8 | 514 | 2.56 | [ |
| Nanjing, China | 126 | 11 | 56 | 123 | 394 | 13 | 1.1 | 103 | 0.12 | [ | |
| Hangzhou, China | 51 | 20 | 26 | 116 | 321 | 1.6 | 202 | 0.7 | [ | ||
| Guiyang, China | 130 | 59 | 129 | 182 | 11 | 0.6 | 67 | 0.38 | [ | ||
| Xi’an, China | 65 | 72 | 295 | 10 | 3.7 | 131 | 0.43 | [ | |||
| Baoji, China | 123 | 123 | 42 | 113 | 612 | 18 | 383 | 1 | [ | ||
| Hongkong, China | 324 | 10 | 42 | 534 | 4024 | 1.8 | 240 | 0.6 | [ | ||
| Beijing, China | 86 | 11 | 45 | 138 | 723 | 24 | 2.3 | 12.3 | 168 | [ | |
| Shanghai, China | 264 | 66 | 258 | 753 | 8 | 1 | 237 | 0.14 | [ | ||
| Amman, Jordan | 29 | 32 | 66 | 139 | 351 | 1.9 | 271 | [ | |||
| Kavala, Greece | 196 | 58 | 124 | 272 | 17 | 0.2 | 301 | 0.10 | [ | ||
| Birmingham, UK | 41 | 467 | 534 | 1.6 | 48 | [ | |||||
| Luanda, Angola | 26 | 3 | 10 | 42 | 317 | 5 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 351 | 0.13 | [ |
| Ottawa, Canada | 42 | 8 | 15 | 38 | 101 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 33 | 0.02 | [ |
| Tehran, Iran | 77 | 58 | 275 | 666 | 5 | 0.8 | 11 | 213 | [ | ||
| Shiraz, Iran | 678 | 78 | 136 | 403 | 7 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 116 | 1.05 | [ | |
| Changchun, China | 96 | 68 | 465 | 23 | 0.6 | 94 | 0.24 | [ | |||
| Huainan, China | 618 | 9 | 36 | 7 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 43 | 0.20 | [ | ||
| Suzhou, China | 113 | 28 | 2258 | 45 | [ |
Figure 2Box plot of geo-accumulation index value (I) of trace metal(loid)s in street dust of Hezhang city.
Correlation coefficient for metal(loid)s, pH, OM in street dust of Hezhang city (n = 30).
| Element | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Sb | Pb | Hg | pH | OM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 1 | |||||||||||
| Co | 0.19 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Ni | 0.49 ** | 0.70 ** | 1 | |||||||||
| Cu | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.64 ** | 1 | ||||||||
| Zn | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.37 * | 0.54 * | 1 | |||||||
| As | −0.15 | −0.35 | −0.34 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 1 | ||||||
| Cd | −0.15 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.38 * | 0.01 | 1 | |||||
| Sb | −0.13 | −0.05 | −0.04 | 0.30 | 0.57 ** | 0.80 ** | 0.27 | 1 | ||||
| Pb | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.61 ** | 0.37 * | 0.37 * | 0.58 ** | 1 | |||
| Hg | −0.07 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.44 * | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.42 * | 1 | ||
| pH | 0.04 | −0.15 | −0.20 | −0.27 | −0.21 | 0.16 | −0.13 | −0.01 | −0.10 | 0.40 * | 1 | |
| OM | −0.08 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.36 | −0.11 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.62 ** | 0.50 ** | 1 |
Note: * Significant at 0.05 level (two tails); ** Significant at 0.01 level (two tails).
Varimax rotated principal components analysis of metal(loid)s in Hezhang city (n = 30).
| Component | PC-1 | PC-2 | PC-3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cr | 0.020 | −0.354 | |
| Co | −0.331 | 0.381 | |
| Ni | −0.150 | 0.126 | |
| Cu | 0.287 | 0.153 | |
| Zn | 0.450 | 0.497 | |
| As | −0.261 | −0.088 | |
| Cd | 0.068 | −0.057 | |
| Sb | 0.026 | 0.256 | |
| Pb | 0.244 | 0.446 | |
| Hg | 0.189 | 0.123 | |
| Eigenvalues | 3.3 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| % of Variance | 32.6 | 24.2 | 12.0 |
| Cumulative% | 32.6 | 56.8 | 68.8 |
Note: Scores higher than 0.5 are shown in bold.
Figure 33D plot of scores for investigated elements obtained from PCA results for street dust of Hezhang city.
Exposure dose, hazard quotients, and hazard index of studied metal(loid)s for children and adults in Hezhang city.
| Element | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | ||
| Cr | 2.07 × 10−3 | 2.78 × 10−4 | 3.92 × 10−8 | 4.21 × 10−8 | 1.86 × 10−5 | 1.39 × 10−5 | 6.90 × 10−1 | 9.26 × 10−2 | 1.37 × 10−3 | 1.47 × 10−3 | 3.11 × 10−1 | 2.32 × 10−1 | 0.326 | ||
| Co | 2.41 × 10−4 | 3.24 × 10−5 | 4.57 × 10−9 | 4.90 × 10−9 | 2.17 × 10−6 | 1.62 × 10−6 | 1.21 × 10−2 | 1.62 × 10−3 | 8.00 × 10−4 | 8.59 × 10−4 | 1.4 × 10−4 | 1 × 10−4 | 0.013 | 0.003 | |
| Ni | 5.65 × 10−4 | 7.59 × 10−5 | 1.07 × 10−8 | 1.15 × 10−8 | 5.09 × 10−6 | 3.79 × 10−6 | 2.83 × 10−2 | 3.79 × 10−3 | 5.20 × 10−7 | 5.58 × 10−7 | 9.4 × 10−4 | 7 × 10−4 | 0.029 | 0.004 | |
| Cu | 2.94 × 10−3 | 3.95 × 10−4 | 5.58 × 10−8 | 5.99 × 10−8 | 2.65 × 10−5 | 1.98 × 10−5 | 7.36 × 10−2 | 9.88 × 10−3 | 1.39 × 10−6 | 1.49 × 10−6 | 2.21 × 10−3 | 1.65 × 10−3 | 0.076 | 0.012 | |
| Zn | 1.38 × 10−2 | 1.85 × 10−3 | 2.62 × 10−7 | 2.81 × 10−7 | 1.24 × 10−4 | 9.27 × 10−5 | 4.61 × 10−2 | 6.18 × 10−3 | 8.72 × 10−7 | 9.36 × 10−7 | 2.07 × 10−3 | 1.54 × 10−3 | 0.048 | 0.008 | |
| As | 7.92 × 10−4 | 1.06 × 10−4 | 1.50 × 10−8 | 1.61 × 10−8 | 2.14 × 10−4 | 1.59 × 10−4 | 3.54 × 10−1 | 5.00 × 10−5 | 5.36 × 10−5 | ||||||
| Cd | 4.47 × 10−5 | 6.00 × 10−6 | 8.48 × 10−10 | 9.10 × 10−10 | 4.03 × 10−7 | 3 × 10−7 | 4.45 × 10−2 | 6 × 10−3 | 8.48 × 10−7 | 9.10 × 10−7 | 4.03 × 10−2 | 3 × 10−2 | 0.085 | 0.036 | |
| Sb | 1.04 × 10−4 | 1.40 × 10−5 | 1.97 × 10−9 | 2.12 × 10−9 | 9.37 × 10−7 | 6.98 × 10−7 | 2.60 × 10−1 | 3.49 × 10−2 | 4.93 × 10−6 | 5.29 × 10−6 | 1.17 × 10−1 | 8.73 × 10−2 | 0.122 | ||
| Pb | 5.89 × 10−3 | 7.91 × 10−4 | 1.12 × 10−7 | 1.20 × 10−7 | 5.30 × 10−5 | 3.95 × 10−5 | 2.26 × 10−1 | 3.17 × 10−5 | 3.40 × 10−5 | 1.01 × 10−1 | 7.53 × 10−2 | 0.301 | |||
| Hg | 4.22 × 10−6 | 5.66 × 10−7 | 7.99 × 10−11 | 8.57 × 10−11 | 3.80 × 10−8 | 2.83 × 10−8 | 1.41 × 10−2 | 1.89 × 10−3 | 9.32 × 10−7 | 1.00 × 10−6 | 1.81 × 10−3 | 1.35 × 10−3 | 0.016 | 0.003 | |
Note: Exposure dose, hazard quotients, and hazard index higher than 1 are shown in bold.
Daily exposure dose and cancer risk of metal(loid)s in street dust to population in Hezhang city.
| Parametes | Cr | Co | Ni | As | Cd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.13 × 10−4 | |||||
| 2.14 × 10−8 | 2.49 × 10−9 | 5.84 × 10−9 | 8.19 × 10−9 | 4.63 × 10−10 | |
| 8.66 × 10−5 | |||||
| 4.35 × 10−8 | 2.19 × 10−7 | 4.46 × 10−7 | 1.82 × 10−9 | ||
| 4.35 × 10−9 | 2.21 × 10−7 | 1.86 × 10−10 |
Note: Cancer risk of metal(loid)s higher than 1 × 10−6 are shown in bold.
Comparisons of HIs for trace metal(loid)s in street dust of different cities.
| Population Groups | City | Cr | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | As | Cd | Sb | Pb | Hg | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children | Hezhang, China | 1.3 × 10−2 | 2.9 × 10−2 | 7.6 × 10−2 | 4.8 × 10−2 | 8.5 × 10−2 | 1.6 × 10−2 | This study | ||||
| Zhuzhou, China | 6.3 × 10−3 | 1.5 × 10−2 | 2.9 × 10−2 | 8.1 × 10−2 | [ | |||||||
| Huludao, China | 4.8 × 10−2 | [ | ||||||||||
| Beijing, China | 3.9 × 10−3 | 1.7 × 10−2 | 2.8 × 10−2 | 1.8 × 10−2 | 2 × 10−2 | [ | ||||||
| Nanjing, China | 4.6 × 10−3 | 1.7 × 10−3 | 5.5 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−2 | 5.1 × 10−3 | 8.0 × 10−3 | [ | |||||
| Shiraz, Iran | 1.2 × 10−3 | 4.9 × 10−3 | 8.8 × 10−3 | 6.4 × 10−3 | 1.4 × 10−3 | [ | ||||||
| Luanda, Angola | 6.6 × 10−2 | 1.1 × 10−3 | 3.6 × 10−3 | 7.3 × 10−3 | 7.4 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−2 | 6.6 × 10−2 | 1.6 × 10−2 | [ | |||
| Adult | Hezhang, China | 3 × 10−3 | 4 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−2 | 8.0 × 10−3 | 3.6 × 10−2 | 3 × 10−3 | This study | ||||
| Zhuzhou, China | 4.5 × 10−2 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 2 × 10−3 | 4 × 10−3 | 1.1 × 10−2 | 7.4 × 10−2 | 5.1 × 10−2 | [ | ||||
| Huludao, China | 5.7 × 10−3 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 8.8 × 10−2 | [ | ||||||||
| Beijing, China | 1.7 × 10−3 | 6.9 × 10−4 | 2.2 × 10−3 | 3.6 × 10−3 | 2.3 × 10−3 | 2.5 × 10−3 | 3.9 × 10−2 | 4.5 × 10−2 | [ | |||
| Nanjing, China | 5.2 × 10−3 | 2.4 × 10−4 | 6.0 × 10−4 | 1.3 × 10−3 | 5.5 × 10−4 | 9.3 × 10−4 | 1.4 × 10−2 | [ | ||||
| Shiraz, Iran | 2 × 10−4 | 7.2 × 10−4 | 9.0 × 10−4 | 7.8 × 10−4 | 1.1 × 10−4 | 4.9 × 10−2 | 6.1 × 10−2 | [ |
Note: HIs for trace metal(loid)s higher than 0.1 are shown in bold.
Comparisons of cancer risk in street dust of different cities.
| City | As | Cr | Ni | Cd | Co | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hezhang, China | 4.9 × 10−4 | 3.1 × 10−6 | 2.2 × 10−7 | 1.8 × 10−9 | 4.6 × 10−8 | This study |
| Zhuzhou, China | 1.1 × 10−6 | 3.2 × 10−8 | 6.9 × 10−9 | 8.5 × 10−8 | 3.2 × 10−8 | [ |
| Huludao, China | 2.4 × 10−8 | [ | ||||
| Beijing, China | 2.4 × 10−8 | 2.0 × 10−7 | 2.1 × 10−9 | 9.5 × 10−10 | 5.6 × 10−9 | [ |
| Nanjing, China | 3.9 × 10−8 | 7.2 × 10−10 | 3.1 × 10−10 | 2.3 × 10−9 | [ | |
| Shiraz, Iran | 1.1 × 10−8 | 8.3 × 10−8 | [ | |||
| Luanda, Angola | 7.7 × 10−6 | 5.7 × 10−8 | 4.6 × 10−10 | 3.9 × 10−10 | 1.5 × 10−9 | [ |