Literature DB >> 28841088

Knowledge of Constituent Ingredients in Enteral Nutrition Formulas Can Make a Difference in Patient Response to Enteral Feeding.

Patricia Savino1.   

Abstract

Enteral feeding is considered the preferred method for providing a complete or supplemental source of nutrition to patients. Enteral formulas (EFs) are traditionally assessed from general information provided by the manufacturer such as caloric density, percentage of macronutrients, and micronutrients to meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance. Sometimes labeling information highlights particular ingredients to indicate specific properties at a metabolic or nutrition level. However, it is necessary to review the quality and composition of any enteral formula, since the basic components are responsible for tolerance and nutrition efficacy, and this should not be overshadowed by the benefit of a single constituent. Intolerance to EF is commonly attributed to individual patient response or to the means of administration. The objective of this review is to highlight the importance of appraising EFs with regard to composition and effect on the gastrointestinal tract.
© 2017 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enteral formula; enteral nutrition; formulated food; intolerance; nutritional support

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28841088     DOI: 10.1177/0884533617724759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract        ISSN: 0884-5336            Impact factor:   3.080


  7 in total

1.  A Descriptive Analysis of Macronutrient, Fatty Acid Profile, and Some Immunomodulatory Nutrients in Standard and Disease-Specific Enteral Formulae in Europe.

Authors:  Mar Ruperto; Ana Montero-Bravo; Teresa Partearroyo; Ana M Puga; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Maria de Lourdes Samaniego-Vaesken
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  An Evaluation of the Nutritional Value and Physical Properties of Blenderised Enteral Nutrition Formula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omorogieva Ojo; Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye; Osarhumwese Osaretin Ojo; Xiaohua Wang; Joanne Brooke
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Recovery of malnutrition in a patient with severe brain injury outcomes: A case report.

Authors:  Santina Caliri; Adriana Andaloro; Francesco Corallo; Antonina Donato; Silvia Marino; Carmela Mantarro; Aurelio Terranova; Placido Bramanti; Fabrizia Caminiti; Carmela Rifici
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Tapioca Resistant Maltodextrin as a Carbohydrate Source of Oral Nutrition Supplement (ONS) on Metabolic Indicators: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Junaida Astina; Weeraya Saphyakhajorn; Chaleeda Borompichaichartkul; Suwimol Sapwarobol
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Blenderised Tube Feeds vs. Commercial Formula: Which Is Better for Gastrostomy-Fed Children?

Authors:  Neha Chandrasekar; Kate Dehlsen; Steven T Leach; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 6.  Early or Late Feeding after ICU Admission?

Authors:  Annika Reintam Blaser; Mette M Berger
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Semi-Elemental and Elemental Formulas for Enteral Nutrition in Infants and Children with Medical Complexity-Thinking about Cow's Milk Allergy and Beyond.

Authors:  Elvira Verduci; Silvia Salvatore; Ilia Bresesti; Elisabetta Di Profio; Erica Pendezza; Alessandra Bosetti; Massimo Agosti; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti; Enza D'Auria
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.