Literature DB >> 28840885

'Non-standard' panoramic programmes and the unusual artefacts they produce.

S Harvey1, F Ball1, J Brown1, B Thomas1.   

Abstract

Dental panoramic radiographs (DPTs) are commonly taken in dental practice in the UK with the number estimated to be 2.7 million per annum. They are used to diagnose caries, periodontal disease, trauma, pathology in the jaws, supernumerary teeth and for orthodontic assessment. Panoramic radiographs are not simple projections but involve a moving X-ray source and detector plate. Ideally only the objects in the focal trough are displayed. This is achieved with a tomographic movement and one or more centre(s) of rotation. One advantage of digital radiography is hardware and software changes to optimise the image. This has led to increasingly complex manufacturer specific digital panoramic programmes. Panoramic radiographs suffer from ghost artefacts which can limit the effectiveness and make interpretation difficult. Conversely 'conventional dental imaging' such as intraoral bitewings do not suffer the same problems. There are also now several 'non-standard' panoramic programmes which aim to optimise the image for different clinical scenarios. These include 'improved interproximality', 'improved orthogonality' and 'panoramic bitewing mode'.This technical report shows that these 'non-standard' panoramic programmes can produce potentially confusing ghost artefacts, of which the practitioner may not be aware.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840885     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  4 in total

1.  A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.

Authors:  Glenn L Terry; Marcel Noujeim; Robert P Langlais; William S Moore; Thomas J Prihoda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.

Authors:  Z Z Akarslan; M Akdevelioğlu; K Güngör; H Erten
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  K Kamburoglu; E Kolsuz; S Murat; S Yüksel; T Ozen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  The use of panoramic radiography in the evaluation of asymptomatic adult dental patients.

Authors:  R W Valachovic; C W Douglass; A B Reiskin; H H Chauncey; B J McNeil
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1986-03
  4 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Medial Sigmoid Depression of the Mandibular Ramus as a Lesion-Mimicking Anatomical Variation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Natalie Sui Miu Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  COVID-19 and beyond: implications for dental radiography.

Authors:  Rachel Little; Jessica Howell; Paul Nixon
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.727

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.