Literature DB >> 28840592

Left atrial appendage closure for "primary primary" prevention during percutaneous closure of septal defects in patients with large atria but no atrial fibrillation.

Shingo Kuwata, Juliane Vierecke, Steffen Gloekler, Francesco Maisano, Bernhard Meier, Fabian Nietlispach1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure is a routine procedure to prevent right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension, or paradoxical embolism. The latter is the typical reason for percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. Atrial enlargement represents a risk for develop-ing atrial fibrillation (AF). Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is emerging as a preven-tive therapy for patients in AF who suffered from a previous stroke or bleeding (secondary prevention) or patients without previous stroke or bleeding (primary prevention). Percutaneous septal closure, particularly that of large ASDs, may inhibit future percutaneous left atrial access when required for LAA closure. Reported herein is the feasibility and safety of concomitant percutaneous closure of the LAA and a septal shunt, mostly large ASDs, in patients without AF, in the sense of "primary primary" preventive LAA closure. The first "primary" relates to "in anticipation of AF" and potentially also for "for prevention of AF". The second "primary" relates to "prevention of stroke or bleeding".
METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients, older than 40 years without any clinical or electrocardio-graphic evidence of AF, underwent percutaneous closure of large ASDs or PFOs in the presence of enlarged atria at the university hospitals of Bern and Zurich between April 2013 and June 2015. They concomitantly received "primary primary" preventive LAA closure after informed consent.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 ± 9 years (46% male). Procedural success was achieved in all pa-tients and no major adverse events occurred acutely or during the following 2.0 ± 0.8 years. No patient developed AF.
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant closure of ASD or PFO in the presence of enlarged atria and LAA for "primary primary" prevention appears feasible and safe but has yet to prove its justification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; atrial septal defect closure; left atrial appendage closure; patent foramen ovale closure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840592     DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of PFO Closure in Ischemic Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Nicholas D Osteraas; Alejandro Vargas; Laurel Cherian; Sarah Song
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-14

2.  Delayed cardiac tamponade after simultaneous transcatheter atrial septal defect closure and left atrial appendage closure device implantation: a particular case report.

Authors:  Jian-Ming Wang; Qi-Guang Wang; Xian-Yang Zhu
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Unconventional combination of left atrial appendage device occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation who needed concomitant catheter interventions for underlying structural heart disease.

Authors:  Palaparti Raghuram; Sreeja Pavithran; Kothandam Sivakumar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-07-28

4.  Feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage closure in a patient with previous foramen ovale occlusion: a case report.

Authors:  Mario Matta; Ludovica Maltese; Fabrizio Ugo; Maria Virginia Di Ruocco; Francesco Rametta
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Midterm Prognosis of Sexagenary Patients after Transcatheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: a Single-Chinese Center Experience.

Authors:  Kai-Peng Sun; Ning Xu; Shu-Ting Huang; Hua Cao; Qiang Chen
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.