E Pagnin1, V Ravarotto1, G Maiolino2, E Naso1, P A Davis3, L A Calò4. 1. Department of Medicine (DIMED), Nephrology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. 2. Hypertension, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. 3. Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, USA. 4. Department of Medicine (DIMED), Nephrology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. renzcalo@unipd.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Gitelman's syndrome (GS) presents normo-hypotension and absence of cardiovascular-renal remodeling despite high angiotensin II (Ang II), activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is a human model of endogenous antagonism of Ang II signaling, opposite to hypertension. GS's clinical presentation leads to questions regarding what features might be responsible. One area of investigation involves Ang II signaling. In hypertensive patients, RhoA/Rho kinase (RhoA/ROCK) pathway activation by Ang II is involved in hypertension development/maintenance and induction of long-term consequences (cardiovascular-renal remodeling), while GS has reduced p63RhoGEF gene and protein levels and ROCK activity. Ang II signaling is mediated by Gαq, which interacts with p63RhoGEF via the α6-αN linker connecting p63RhoGEF's DH and PH domains acting as a conformational switch to activate RhoA/ROCK signaling. METHODS: We have investigated in GS patients, the presence of mutations in either p63RhoGEF's α6-αN linker domain and in Gαq's Ala253, Trp263, and Tyr356 residues, crucial for p63RhoGEF-Gαq interplay. RESULTS: No mutations have been found in specific aminoacids of p63RhoGEF α6-αN linker and Gαq, key for p63RhoGEF/Gαq interplay. CONCLUSIONS: Gitelman's syndrome normo/hypotension and lack of cardiovascular-renal remodeling are not due to mutations of p63RhoGEF α6-αN linker and Gαq interactions. This opens the way for investigations on different coding and no-coding regions (p63RhoGEF and Gαq promoters) and on altered transcriptional/post-transcriptional regulation. Clarification of how these biochemical/molecular mechanisms work/interact would provide insights into mechanisms involved in the GS's Ang II signaling fine tuning, in human physiology/pathophysiology in general and could also identify significant targets for intervention in the treatments of hypertension.
PURPOSE:Gitelman's syndrome (GS) presents normo-hypotension and absence of cardiovascular-renal remodeling despite high angiotensin II (Ang II), activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is a human model of endogenous antagonism of Ang II signaling, opposite to hypertension. GS's clinical presentation leads to questions regarding what features might be responsible. One area of investigation involves Ang II signaling. In hypertensivepatients, RhoA/Rho kinase (RhoA/ROCK) pathway activation by Ang II is involved in hypertension development/maintenance and induction of long-term consequences (cardiovascular-renal remodeling), while GS has reduced p63RhoGEF gene and protein levels and ROCK activity. Ang II signaling is mediated by Gαq, which interacts with p63RhoGEF via the α6-αN linker connecting p63RhoGEF's DH and PH domains acting as a conformational switch to activate RhoA/ROCK signaling. METHODS: We have investigated in GSpatients, the presence of mutations in either p63RhoGEF's α6-αN linker domain and in Gαq's Ala253, Trp263, and Tyr356 residues, crucial for p63RhoGEF-Gαq interplay. RESULTS: No mutations have been found in specific aminoacids of p63RhoGEF α6-αN linker and Gαq, key for p63RhoGEF/Gαq interplay. CONCLUSIONS:Gitelman's syndrome normo/hypotension and lack of cardiovascular-renal remodeling are not due to mutations of p63RhoGEF α6-αN linker and Gαq interactions. This opens the way for investigations on different coding and no-coding regions (p63RhoGEF and Gαq promoters) and on altered transcriptional/post-transcriptional regulation. Clarification of how these biochemical/molecular mechanisms work/interact would provide insights into mechanisms involved in the GS's Ang II signaling fine tuning, in human physiology/pathophysiology in general and could also identify significant targets for intervention in the treatments of hypertension.
Authors: Scott P Heximer; Russell H Knutsen; Xiaoguang Sun; Kevin M Kaltenbronn; Man-Hee Rhee; Ning Peng; Antonio Oliveira-dos-Santos; Josef M Penninger; Anthony J Muslin; Thomas H Steinberg; J Michael Wyss; Robert P Mecham; Kendall J Blumer Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Aruna Shankaranarayanan; Cassandra A Boguth; Susanne Lutz; Christiane Vettel; Franca Uhlemann; Mohamed Aittaleb; Thomas Wieland; John J G Tesmer Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2010-03-07 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Lorenzo A Calò; Ugo Vertolli; Elisa Pagnin; Verdiana Ravarotto; Paul A Davis; Mario Lupia; Elena Naso; Giuseppe Maiolino; Agostino Naso Journal: Life Sci Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.037
Authors: Luigi Gabrielli; Jose L Winter; Ivan Godoy; Paul McNab; Ivonne Padilla; Samuel Cordova; Paola Rigotti; Ulises Novoa; Italo Mora; Lorena García; Maria P Ocaranza; Jorge E Jalil Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: K Mary Tang; Guang-rong Wang; Ping Lu; Richard H Karas; Mark Aronovitz; Scott P Heximer; Kevin M Kaltenbronn; Kendall J Blumer; David P Siderovski; Yan Zhu; Michael E Mendelsohn; Mary Tang; Guang Wang Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-11-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Aruna Shankaranarayanan; David M Thal; Valerie M Tesmer; David L Roman; Richard R Neubig; Tohru Kozasa; John J G Tesmer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-10-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Lorenzo A Calò; Elisa Pagnin; Paul A Davis; Michelangelo Sartori; Giulio Ceolotto; Achille C Pessina; Andrea Semplicini Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.958