Chris M Lindquist1, Frank H Miller2, Nancy A Hammond2, Paul Nikolaidis2. 1. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada. chrislindquist1@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St. Suite 800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This article reviews the current evidence surrounding pancreatic cancer screening. The current targets of screening include identification of early pancreatic cancer, as well as the two most important precursor lesions; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and high grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Given the relatively low incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the general population, patients with elevated risk based on family history or an underlying genetic syndrome are felt to be the most appropriate patients to undergo screening. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was performed and the major findings of the available literature regarding pancreatic screening are reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Several prospective trials have evaluated pancreatic cancer screening in high-risk groups. The results of those trials are summarized in this article. Current consensus guidelines and recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium Summit are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The exact benefit of pancreatic cancer screening remains unclear at this time, but emerging evidence suggests that there is a window of opportunity to detect precursor lesions and early pancreatic adenocarcinomas in high-risk patient populations. Better understanding of the pathway of carcinogenesis will hopefully improve our ability to detect early, resectable pancreatic carcinomas, and provide a mortality benefit to patients at significantly elevated risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
PURPOSE: This article reviews the current evidence surrounding pancreatic cancer screening. The current targets of screening include identification of early pancreatic cancer, as well as the two most important precursor lesions; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and high grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Given the relatively low incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the general population, patients with elevated risk based on family history or an underlying genetic syndrome are felt to be the most appropriate patients to undergo screening. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was performed and the major findings of the available literature regarding pancreatic screening are reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Several prospective trials have evaluated pancreatic cancer screening in high-risk groups. The results of those trials are summarized in this article. Current consensus guidelines and recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium Summit are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The exact benefit of pancreatic cancer screening remains unclear at this time, but emerging evidence suggests that there is a window of opportunity to detect precursor lesions and early pancreatic adenocarcinomas in high-risk patient populations. Better understanding of the pathway of carcinogenesis will hopefully improve our ability to detect early, resectable pancreatic carcinomas, and provide a mortality benefit to patients at significantly elevated risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Entities:
Keywords:
EUS; Familial pancreatic cancer; MRI; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma screening; Pancreatic cancer screening; Pancreatic cancer screening guidelines
Authors: Ajaykumar C Morani; Abdelrahman K Hanafy; Nisha S Ramani; Venkata S Katabathina; Sireesha Yedururi; Anil K Dasyam; Srinivasa R Prasad Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer Date: 2020-03-13
Authors: Jill P Smith; Hong Cao; Wenqiang Chen; Bhaskar Kallakury; Teresa Phillips; Lynda Sutton; Allen Cato Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2021-08-24
Authors: Sabine Naudin; Vivian Viallon; Dana Hashim; Heinz Freisling; Mazda Jenab; Elisabete Weiderpass; Flavie Perrier; Fiona McKenzie; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Christina C Dahm; Kim Overvad; Francesca R Mancini; Vinciane Rebours; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Verena Katzke; Rudolf Kaaks; Manuela Bergmann; Heiner Boeing; Eleni Peppa; Anna Karakatsani; Antonia Trichopoulou; Valeria Pala; Giovana Masala; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Anne M May; Carla H van Gils; Charlotta Rylander; Kristin Benjaminsen Borch; María Dolores Chirlaque López; Maria-Jose Sánchez; Eva Ardanaz; José Ramón Quirós; Pilar Amiano Exezarreta; Malin Sund; Isabel Drake; Sara Regnér; Ruth C Travis; Nick Wareham; Dagfinn Aune; Elio Riboli; Marc J Gunter; Eric J Duell; Paul Brennan; Pietro Ferrari Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 8.082