Literature DB >> 28840157

Evaluation of evoked responses to pulse-matched high frequency and intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation using simultaneous functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Adrian Curtin1,2, Junfeng Sun1, Hasan Ayaz2,3,4, Zhenying Qian5, Banu Onaral2, Jijun Wang5, Shanbao Tong1.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive method used to excite or inhibit cortical activity for experimental, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions. However, nonmotor regions of the brain targeted in TMS therapies, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), offer no extrinsic response to stimulation, resulting in a need for a practical method for the evaluation of treatment. We sought to determine the capability of a continuous-wave light emitting diodes (LED)-based functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system to measure evoked cortical hemoglobin changes in the DLPFC during the simultaneous application of TMS to the left-DLPFC under brief stimulation paradigms used in the clinic. Seventeen healthy participants received short TMS trains at F3 in four different stimulation conditions (single pulse, high frequency, intermittent theta burst, and sham) while adjacent fNIRS measurements were recorded. Ten 2-s trains of each stimulation type were delivered with an intertrial interval of 40 s. Results indicated that high-frequency stimulation produces a larger and more evident response than other measured conditions. These findings show that a continuous-wave LED-based fNIRS system can be used to measure TMS-evoked responses and that future TMS applications can benefit from concurrent assessment of localized cortical activation changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional near-infrared spectroscopy; intermittent theta burst stimulation; mental health; neurostimulation; prefrontal cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840157      PMCID: PMC5559641          DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.041405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurophotonics        ISSN: 2329-423X            Impact factor:   3.593


  56 in total

1.  No evidence of hearing loss in humans due to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; L G Cohen; L I Shotland; N Dang; A Pikus; E M Wassermann; J P Brasil-Neto; J Valls-Solé; M Hallett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Robertson; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application.

Authors:  Marco Ferrari; Valentina Quaresima
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Stimulus intensity dependence of cerebral blood volume changes in left frontal lobe by low-frequency rTMS to right frontal lobe: A near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Aoyama; Naoki Hanaoka; Masaki Kameyama; Masashi Suda; Toshimasa Sato; Mingqiao Song; Masato Fukuda; Masahiko Mikuni
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.304

5.  Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: when less may be more.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement.

Authors:  D T Delpy; M Cope; P van der Zee; S Arridge; S Wray; J Wyatt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Mark A Halko; Mark C Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depressed patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  David Rossini; Adelio Lucca; Raffaella Zanardi; Lorenzo Magri; Enrico Smeraldi
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  High (15 Hz) and low (1 Hz) frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation have different acute effects on regional cerebral blood flow in depressed patients.

Authors:  C K Loo; P S Sachdev; W Haindl; W Wen; P B Mitchell; V M Croker; G S Malhi
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Cerebral blood flow identifies responders to transcranial magnetic stimulation in auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  P Homan; J Kindler; M Hauf; D Hubl; T Dierks
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans

Authors:  Po-Yi Tsai; Wang-Sheng Lin; Kun-Ting Tsai; Chia-Yu Kuo; Pei-Hsin Lin
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Neuroimaging mechanisms of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Li-Qiong Yuan; Qing Zeng; Dan Wang; Xiu-Yun Wen; Yu Shi; Fen Zhu; Shang-Jie Chen; Guo-Zhi Huang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.135

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.