James E Bates1, Michael T Milano2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to have a poor prognosis despite recent advances in both targeted radiotherapy methodologies such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and immunotherapies. The impact of location of metastatic disease in patients with NSCLC has not been investigated; we aimed to investigate this using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: We included 39,910 patients from the SEER database treated for M1b NSCLC from 2010-2013. We identified patients with metastatic disease in the brain, lung, liver, and bone. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of varying sites of metastatic disease on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients with disease coded as in the brain without other disease in the lung, liver, or bone had improved OS relative to all other comers with M1b disease (HR =0.84, 95% CI, 0.84-0.90, P<0.001). Likewise, patients with disease coded as in the bone without other disease in the lung, liver, or brain had improved OS relative to all other comers with M1b disease (HR =0.89, 95% CI, 0.86-0.92, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-generating analysis suggests that patients with limited metastatic NSCLC to the bone or brain may particularly benefit from aggressive upfront therapies.
BACKGROUND: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to have a poor prognosis despite recent advances in both targeted radiotherapy methodologies such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and immunotherapies. The impact of location of metastatic disease in patients with NSCLC has not been investigated; we aimed to investigate this using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS: We included 39,910 patients from the SEER database treated for M1bNSCLC from 2010-2013. We identified patients with metastatic disease in the brain, lung, liver, and bone. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of varying sites of metastatic disease on overall survival (OS). RESULTS:Patients with disease coded as in the brain without other disease in the lung, liver, or bone had improved OS relative to all other comers with M1b disease (HR =0.84, 95% CI, 0.84-0.90, P<0.001). Likewise, patients with disease coded as in the bone without other disease in the lung, liver, or brain had improved OS relative to all other comers with M1b disease (HR =0.89, 95% CI, 0.86-0.92, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-generating analysis suggests that patients with limited metastatic NSCLC to the bone or brain may particularly benefit from aggressive upfront therapies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER); extrathoracic metastasis; oligometastases; survival
Authors: Mark J Stavas; Kyle O Arneson; Matthew S Ning; Albert A Attia; Sharon E Phillips; Stephanie M Perkins; Eric T Shinohara Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sarah B Goldberg; Scott N Gettinger; Amit Mahajan; Anne C Chiang; Roy S Herbst; Mario Sznol; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Justine Cohen; Alexander Vortmeyer; Lucia Jilaveanu; James Yu; Upendra Hegde; Stephanie Speaker; Matthew Madura; Amanda Ralabate; Angel Rivera; Elin Rowen; Heather Gerrish; Xiaopan Yao; Veronica Chiang; Harriet M Kluger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Oscar Arrieta; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Jesús Zamora; Mónika Blake-Cerda; María D de la Mata; Diego G Zavala; Saé Muñiz-Hernández; Jaime de la Garza Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Amanda Jane Williams Gibson; Haocheng Li; Adrijana D'Silva; Roxana A Tudor; Anifat A Elegbede; Shannon Mary Otsuka; D Gwyn Bebb; Winson Y Cheung Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Angel Qin; Songzhu Zhao; Abdul Miah; Lai Wei; Sandipkumar Patel; Andrew Johns; Madison Grogan; Erin M Bertino; Kai He; Peter G Shields; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Shirish M Gadgeel; Nithya Ramnath; Bryan J Schneider; Khaled A Hassan; Nicholas Szerlip; Zoey Chopra; Sara Journey; Jessica Waninger; Daniel Spakowicz; David P Carbone; Carolyn J Presley; Gregory A Otterson; Michael D Green; Dwight H Owen Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 12.693