| Literature DB >> 28839946 |
Laura A Heaps1, Christopher J Scudder1,2, Vicky J Lipscomb1, Sarah Ml Steinbach3, Simon L Priestnall4, Henny Martineau4, Balazs Szladovits4, Robert C Fowkes2, Oliver A Garden1.
Abstract
CASEEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28839946 PMCID: PMC5555519 DOI: 10.1177/2055116917722701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JFMS Open Rep ISSN: 2055-1169
Figure 1Fine-needle aspirate cytology from the right ovary. Epithelial cells arranged in acinar-like structures with bright eosinophilic granular material in the middle (Call–Exner bodies); × 40 oil objective, Modified Wright’s stain. Bar = 10 µm
Figure 2(a) Haematoxylin and eosin-stained section of tissue of the ovarian neoplasm showing a region where the neoplasm is encapsulated. (b–e) Anti-Müllerian hormone immunoreactivity. (b) Antibody-negative control section of tissue from a healthy ovary. (c) Anti-Müllerian hormone immunoreactivity identified in primordial, primary and secondary ovarian follicles from a healthy ovary. (d) × 50 magnification, (e) × 200 magnification image demonstrating anti-Müllerian hormone immunoreactivity identified within the neoplastic population of granulosa cells
Results of serum sex hormone analysis prior to ovariohysterectomy
| Patient serum concentration | Upper limit of reference interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Oestradiol (pmol/l) | 5.1 | 10.0 |
| Progesterone (pmol/l) | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| Testosterone (nmol/l) | 0.15 | 0.2 |
Figure 3Scatter dot plot representing serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration (ng/ml) in female neutered (FN; n = 8) and female entire (FE; n = 4) control groups, and pre-(inverted triangle) and post-ovariohysterectomy (triangle) in the cat diagnosed with a granulosa cell tumour (GCT). The length of the vertical line represents the range of the data and the dissecting line represents the median of the data. The lower range and median lines are superimposed in the FN group. The lower level of detection of the assay is 0.04 ng/ml