Literature DB >> 28839856

Variation in preparation for gastroscopy: lessons towards safer and better outcomes.

J L Callaghan1, J R Neale2, P C Boger1, A P Sampson3, P Patel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the methods employed within the UK practice prior to diagnostic gastroscopy and compare with published guidelines for patients undergoing general anaesthesia.
DESIGN: National Health Service (NHS) endoscopy units were invited to take part in a structured telephone survey to determine the length of time patients are kept nil-by-mouth (NBM) for food and fluids prior to gastroscopy, and whether a preprocedure mucolytic drink was used.
METHODS: 212 NHS Trusts providing endoscopy services were identified from the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy. Trusts were excluded if they were children's hospitals (n=5).
RESULTS: 207 NHS Trusts were telephoned. 193 completed the survey (93%), 11 Trusts declined and there was no response from 3 Trusts. 13 separate policies regarding NBM timings were identified. 51 Trusts (21%) used the timings ratified by Surgical and Anaesthetic Societies (6 h NBM for food, 2 h for clear fluid). 135 Trusts (70%) used a policy which starved patients in excess of the standard surgical guidelines. No Trust used a mucolytic drink prior to gastroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey revealed large variation in NHS Trust's policies regarding the times patients were starved prior to gastroscopy. Results of surgical studies demonstrate increased risk of significant pulmonary aspiration with increased fluid-starvation periods, 68% of NHS endoscopy policy would be deemed excessive by surgical practice. There is no routine use of a mucolytic drink to improve mucosal visualisation in the UK practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GASTROSCOPY

Year:  2016        PMID: 28839856      PMCID: PMC5369482          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  27 in total

1.  Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Wouter Curvers; Lubbertus Baak; Ralf Kiesslich; Arnoud Van Oijen; Thomas Rabenstein; Krish Ragunath; Jean-Francois Rey; Pieter Scholten; Uwe Seitz; Fiebo Ten Kate; Paul Fockens; Jacques Bergman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of gastroscopy to detect gastric tumours: clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer missed on endoscopy.

Authors:  Markku E Voutilainen; Matti T Juhola
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Effectiveness of premedication with pronase for improving visibility during gastroendoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Fujii; H Iishi; M Tatsuta; R Hirasawa; N Uedo; K Hifumi; M Omori
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Acetic acid-enhanced chromoendoscopy is more cost-effective than protocol-guided biopsies in a high-risk Barrett's population.

Authors:  P Bhandari; P Kandaswamy; D Cowlishaw; G Longcroft-Wheaton
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  A carbohydrate-rich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients.

Authors:  J Hausel; J Nygren; M Lagerkranser; P M Hellström; F Hammarqvist; C Almström; A Lindh; A Thorell; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Susan G Coe; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Acetic acid spray is an effective tool for the endoscopic detection of neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Moses Duku; Robert Mead; David Poller; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Premedication with N-acetylcysteine and simethicone improves mucosal visualization during gastroscopy: a randomized, controlled, endoscopist-blinded study.

Authors:  James R Neale; Shirley James; James Callaghan; Praful Patel
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 10.  Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications.

Authors:  M Brady; S Kinn; P Stuart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving the mucosal visualization at gastroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials reporting the role of Simethicone ± N-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Saad Rehman; Fergus Chedgy; Krishna K Singh
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-05-19

2.  Patient Education Regarding Fasting Recommendations to Shorten Fasting Times in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Controlled Pilot Study.

Authors:  Harm H J van Noort; Carlijn R Lamers; Hester Vermeulen; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Ben J M Witteman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 1.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.