Literature DB >> 28839805

Are we exposing patients with a mildly elevated faecal calprotectin to unnecessary investigations?

J P Seenan1, F Thomson1, K Rankin2, K Smith2, D R Gaya1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a non-invasive marker used to differentiate irritable bowel syndrome from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, false positives are common. We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of investigation in patients presenting with new lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and a mildly elevated FC (100-200 µg/g).
DESIGN: Retrospective study of electronic patient records. PATIENTS: Patients aged 16-50 years with new lower GI symptoms and an FC 100-200 µg/g were identified from our biochemistry laboratory database between September 2009 and 2011. Patients were excluded if they had a previous FC >200 µg/g, were taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), had IBD, positive stool cultures or 'alarm' symptoms.
SETTING: Secondary care gastroenterology clinics.
RESULTS: 161 patients (103 female patients) were identified. Mean age was 37.3 years with a mean FC of 147 µg/g. 398 endoscopic, radiological and histological investigations were undertaken in 141 patients (an average of 2.8 investigations per patient). 131 colonoscopies were performed with abnormalities in only 24 (18.3%). In patients with a macroscopically normal upper GI endoscopy and colonoscopy, the diagnostic yield of any further investigation was only 7.3%. The negative predictive value (NPV) of an FC 100-200 µg/g was 86.7% for any pathology and 97.5% for significant luminal pathology (IBD, advanced adenoma or colorectal carcinoma). After a mean follow-up of 172.4 weeks, IBD was the final diagnosis in only 4 (2.5%) of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients under 50 years old presenting with new lower GI symptoms, the NPV of an FC between 100 and 200 µg/g in excluding significant organic GI disease is high.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 28839805      PMCID: PMC5369576          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease.

Authors:  Stefan K Gölder; Andreas G Schreyer; Esther Endlicher; Stefan Feuerbach; Jürgen Schölmerich; Frank Kullmann; Johannes Seitz; Gerhard Rogler; Hans Herfarth
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Fecal calprotectin: a selection tool for small bowel capsule endoscopy in suspected IBD with prior negative bi-directional endoscopy.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Sarah Douglas; Marie A Rogers; Ian D Arnott; John N Plevris
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Geert D'Haens; Marc Ferrante; Severine Vermeire; Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Liesbeth Moortgat; Patricia Geens; Doreen Iwens; Isolde Aerden; Gert Van Assche; Gust Van Olmen; Paul Rutgeerts
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.325

5.  [Fecal calprotectin in differential diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome].

Authors:  Xiao-guang Li; Yu-min Lu; Fang Gu; Xue-ling Yang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2006-06-18

6.  A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Stuart L Triester; Jonathan A Leighton; Grigoris I Leontiadis; Suryakanth R Gurudu; David E Fleischer; Amy K Hara; Russell I Heigh; Arthur D Shiff; Virender K Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  A prospective single-centre evaluation of the intra-individual variability of faecal calprotectin in quiescent Crohn's disease.

Authors:  G D Naismith; L A Smith; S J E Barry; J I Munro; S Laird; K Rankin; A J Morris; J W Winter; D R Gaya
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Cornelia Tillack; Julia Seiderer; Stephan Brand; Burkhard Göke; Maximilian F Reiser; Claus Schaefer; Helmut Diepolder; Thomas Ochsenkühn; Karin A Herrmann
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 9.  Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick F van Rheenen; Els Van de Vijver; Vaclav Fidler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-15

10.  Small bowel Crohn's disease: MR enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy compared to balloon-assisted enteroscopy.

Authors:  Bart M Wiarda; Peter B F Mensink; Dimitri G N Heine; Mark Stolk; Jan Dees; Hugo Hazenberg; Jaap Stoker; C Janneke van der Woude; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-06
  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Practical guidance on the use of faecal calprotectin.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Simon Whitehead; Daniel R Gaya; Antony Barney Hawthorne
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-22

2.  Elevated Faecal Calprotectin in Patients with a Normal Colonoscopy: Does It Matter in Clinical Practice? A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Henrik Hovstadius; David Lundgren; Pontus Karling
Journal:  Inflamm Intest Dis       Date:  2021-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.