BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a sensitive marker of intestinal mucosal inflammation. The gold standard in Crohn's disease management is mucosal healing. The role of FC to support clinical practice in Crohn's disease is not yet defined. AIMS: To determine, in patients with Crohn's disease established on biologic therapy: (1) the correlation between disease activity and FC levels, (2) whether FC can predict for relapse and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of the C-reactive protein (CRP) when compared with FC. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-site study, Crohn's disease activity, clinical outcomes, FC and CRP of 76 patients established on biologic therapy were reviewed and mapped over time. RESULTS: Patients were mapped for a median of 34 months (IQR 21-57.5). FC levels were determined every 7 (4-13) months on average. Mean FC in quiescent disease was 105 μg/g (SEM 19); in mild disease, 282 (SEM 71); in moderate disease, 611 (SEM 80) and in severe disease, 1314 (SEM 224) (p<0.001). In asymptomatic patients who relapsed at 6 months, the optimal FC, with an area under the curve of 0.886 (p<0.001), was 357.5. In discriminating quiescent from active disease (FC>100 μg/g) the sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 0.48 (0.36-0.61) and 0.73 (0.6-0.85), and in mild from moderate or active disease (FC>250 μg/g), 0.60 (0.43-0.74) and (0.72 (0.60-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: FC is an accurate marker of Crohn's disease activity and predicts for relapse, thus providing the clinician time to optimise therapy. FC is a more sensitive marker of Crohn's disease activity than CRP.
BACKGROUND: Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a sensitive marker of intestinal mucosal inflammation. The gold standard in Crohn's disease management is mucosal healing. The role of FC to support clinical practice in Crohn's disease is not yet defined. AIMS: To determine, in patients with Crohn's disease established on biologic therapy: (1) the correlation between disease activity and FC levels, (2) whether FC can predict for relapse and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of the C-reactive protein (CRP) when compared with FC. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-site study, Crohn's disease activity, clinical outcomes, FC and CRP of 76 patients established on biologic therapy were reviewed and mapped over time. RESULTS:Patients were mapped for a median of 34 months (IQR 21-57.5). FC levels were determined every 7 (4-13) months on average. Mean FC in quiescent disease was 105 μg/g (SEM 19); in mild disease, 282 (SEM 71); in moderate disease, 611 (SEM 80) and in severe disease, 1314 (SEM 224) (p<0.001). In asymptomatic patients who relapsed at 6 months, the optimal FC, with an area under the curve of 0.886 (p<0.001), was 357.5. In discriminating quiescent from active disease (FC>100 μg/g) the sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 0.48 (0.36-0.61) and 0.73 (0.6-0.85), and in mild from moderate or active disease (FC>250 μg/g), 0.60 (0.43-0.74) and (0.72 (0.60-0.82). CONCLUSIONS:FC is an accurate marker of Crohn's disease activity and predicts for relapse, thus providing the clinician time to optimise therapy. FC is a more sensitive marker of Crohn's disease activity than CRP.
Entities:
Keywords:
Crohn's Disease; Decision Analysis; Gut Inflammation; Infliximab
Authors: Mark S Silverberg; Jack Satsangi; Tariq Ahmad; Ian D R Arnott; Charles N Bernstein; Steven R Brant; Renzo Caprilli; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Christoph Gasche; Karel Geboes; Derek P Jewell; Amir Karban; Edward V Loftus; A Salvador Peña; Robert H Riddell; David B Sachar; Stefan Schreiber; A Hillary Steinhart; Stephan R Targan; Severine Vermeire; B F Warren Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Craig A Solem; Edward V Loftus; William J Tremaine; William S Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Sandborn Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: P Rutgeerts; G D'Haens; S Targan; E Vasiliauskas; S B Hanauer; D H Present; L Mayer; R A Van Hogezand; T Braakman; K L DeWoody; T F Schaible; S J Van Deventer Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: J Tibble; K Teahon; B Thjodleifsson; A Roseth; G Sigthorsson; S Bridger; R Foster; R Sherwood; M Fagerhol; I Bjarnason Journal: Gut Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; William J Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; Richard N Fedorak; Milan Lukas; Donald MacIntosh; Remo Panaccione; Douglas Wolf; Paul Pollack Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: James Turvill; Lisa Rook; Maxine Rawle; Gerry Robins; Simon Smale; Prashant Kant; Anne Phillips Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2017-01-30
Authors: Alan Lobo; Rafael Torrejon Torres; Mark McAlindon; Simon Panter; Catherine Leonard; Nancy van Lent; Rhodri Saunders Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.038