P J Smith1,2, B Theis1, S McCartney1, M Brown1,3,4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital, London, UK. 2. Department of Medicine, University College London, London, UK. 3. Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK. 4. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of, and implement a diagnostic strategy for, imported helminth infection in the gastroenterology clinic. DESIGN: A retrospective study of eosinophil count and probable tropical exposure (phase I) followed by a prospective study of parasitological investigation (phase II). SETTING: Gastroenterology service of an inner London hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients newly attending general gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease clinics. INTERVENTIONS: In phase I, evidence of undiagnosed helminth infection was sought by analysing patient records for associations between eosinophil count and ethnicity. In phase II, a UK guideline for investigation of eosinophilia in migrants was implemented and diagnostic yield determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In phase I, prevalence of eosinophilia was determined; in phase II, helminth prevalence and degree of eosinophilia before and after treatment were reported. Information on symptomatic response to treatment was recorded. Ethnicity was used as a proxy measure for tropical exposure. RESULTS: 426 new patients attended in a 12 month period. Eosinophilia was present in 27 (6.3%). 10/27 (37.0%) patients with eosinophilia were of African or Asian ethnicity whereas only 20% (85/426) of patients overall were from these ethnic groups (χ2=5.27, p=0.02). Following implementation of the protocol, 25/36 migrants with eosinophilia attended for parasitological investigations. Helminth infection was diagnosed in 10/25 (40%). Strongyloidiasis (six patients) and schistosomiasis (three patients) were the most common diagnoses. Median eosinophil count was 1.06×109/l in those with helminths and 0.58×109/l in those without (p=0.004). Eosinophil counts normalised in, and symptomatic improvement was reported by, most patients after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilia is associated with African or Asian ethnicity in an inner city gastroenterology service. This association is probably explained by imported helminths, which are prevalent in this setting, may be a cause of gastrointestinal symptoms and is easily diagnosed and treated by standard protocols.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of, and implement a diagnostic strategy for, imported helminth infection in the gastroenterology clinic. DESIGN: A retrospective study of eosinophil count and probable tropical exposure (phase I) followed by a prospective study of parasitological investigation (phase II). SETTING: Gastroenterology service of an inner London hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients newly attending general gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease clinics. INTERVENTIONS: In phase I, evidence of undiagnosed helminth infection was sought by analysing patient records for associations between eosinophil count and ethnicity. In phase II, a UK guideline for investigation of eosinophilia in migrants was implemented and diagnostic yield determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In phase I, prevalence of eosinophilia was determined; in phase II, helminth prevalence and degree of eosinophilia before and after treatment were reported. Information on symptomatic response to treatment was recorded. Ethnicity was used as a proxy measure for tropical exposure. RESULTS: 426 new patients attended in a 12 month period. Eosinophilia was present in 27 (6.3%). 10/27 (37.0%) patients with eosinophilia were of African or Asian ethnicity whereas only 20% (85/426) of patients overall were from these ethnic groups (χ2=5.27, p=0.02). Following implementation of the protocol, 25/36 migrants with eosinophilia attended for parasitological investigations. Helminth infection was diagnosed in 10/25 (40%). Strongyloidiasis (six patients) and schistosomiasis (three patients) were the most common diagnoses. Median eosinophil count was 1.06×109/l in those with helminths and 0.58×109/l in those without (p=0.004). Eosinophil counts normalised in, and symptomatic improvement was reported by, most patients after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Eosinophilia is associated with African or Asian ethnicity in an inner city gastroenterology service. This association is probably explained by imported helminths, which are prevalent in this setting, may be a cause of gastrointestinal symptoms and is easily diagnosed and treated by standard protocols.
Authors: S Jongwutiwes; M Charoenkorn; P Sitthichareonchai; P Akaraborvorn; C Putaporntip Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 1999 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Sonali Sudarshi; Richard Stümpfle; Margaret Armstrong; Thomas Ellman; Simon Parton; Prabha Krishnan; Peter L Chiodini; Christopher J M Whitty Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Anna M Checkley; Peter L Chiodini; David H Dockrell; Imelda Bates; Guy E Thwaites; Helen L Booth; Michael Brown; Stephen G Wright; Alison D Grant; David C Mabey; Christopher J M Whitty; Frances Sanderson Journal: J Infect Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Elena Pomari; Tamara Ursini; Ronaldo Silva; Martina Leonardi; Marco Ligozzi; Andrea Angheben Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 4.241