| Literature DB >> 28839113 |
Yi No Chen1, Michelle M Schmitz2, Florina Serbanescu1, Michelle M Dynes1, Godson Maro3, Michael R Kramer4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Access to transportation is vital to reducing the travel time to emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) for managing complications and preventing adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study examines the distribution of travel times to EmONC in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, using various transportation schemes, to estimate the proportion of live births (a proxy indicator of women needing delivery care) with poor geographic access to EmONC services.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28839113 PMCID: PMC5620339 DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract ISSN: 2169-575X
FIGURE 1Delivery Health Facilities, by Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Status, Included in the Study, Kigoma Region, Tanzania, 2013
Abbreviations: BEmONC, basic emergency obstetric and neonatal care; BEmONC-1, partially functional BeMONC facility (i.e., BEmONC without assisted vaginal delivery); CEmONC, comprehensive emergency obstetric and neonatal care; CEmONC-1, partially functional CEmONC facility (i.e., CEmONC without assisted vaginal delivery); EmONC, emergency obstetric and neonatal care.
Characteristics of the Input Geospatial Datasets, by Data Layer, for Modeling Travel Time and Estimating Accessibility Coverage Among Women Needing Delivery Care in Kigoma Region, Tanzania
| Data Layer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land Cover | River Network | Road Network | Digital Elevation Model | Birth Density Map | Health Facility Coordinates | |
| Raster | Shapefile | Shapefile | Raster | Raster | Shapefile | |
| 2010 | 2015 | 2015 | 2000 | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development, NASA SERVIR Global21 | OpenStreetMap | OpenStreetMap | Shuttle Radar Topography Mission22 | WorldPop29 | CDC Kigoma Health Facility Assessment16 | |
| 30 meter | N/A | N/A | 30 meter | 100 meter | N/A | |
| Provide non-road land feature class (i.e., forestland, grassland, cropland, settlement, wetland) | Provide a layer of physical barrier in addition to wetland | Provide road land feature class (i.e., major roads, major roads crossing residential areas, secondary roads, local roads) | Provide elevation/slope landscape used for travel speed adjustment for walking | Provide estimated distribution count of live births for a specified travel time catchment | Provide locations of assessed coordinates in the analysis | |
a The 2010 Tanzania land cover scheme I was used to specify non-road land classes.
b Roads are reclassified to reflect the classification scheme used by John Snow, Inc. and Medical Supply Department in the cross-country medical supply route analysis in 2014.
c The layer was created using the mapping methodology described by Tatem et al. (2014).
Source and Rationale for Travel Speed Specification per Land Cover Type in Kigoma Region, Tanzania
| Land Cover Type | Walking | Bicycling | Motorcycle | 4-Wheeled Motor Vehicle | Boat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forestland | Global Accessibility Map (“tree cover/broadleaved and tree cover/mixed leaf type”) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Grassland | Global Accessibility Map (“shrub cover, close-open, evergreen/deciduous, mosaic: cropland/shrub/grass cover, and cultivated and managed area”) | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | N/A | N/A |
| Cropland | Same as in the cell above | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Settlement | Half of the urban walking speed (5 km/hr) specified in AccessMod version 4.0 user manual to approximate the reduced speed of a pregnant woman walking or being carried on a stretcher | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | N/A | N/A |
| Other land classification | Global Accessibility Map (“bare area”) | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | N/A | N/A |
| Boat route | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Local knowledge |
| Major roads | Global Accessibility Map (“bare area”) | AccessMod version 3.0 publication literature | The average motorcycling speed per road class recorded from studies done in Vietnam and the Philippines. | Average speed data taken either from WHO's United Republic of Tanzania Road Safety Brief or from a time-distance study done in Dar es Salaam. | N/A |
| Major roads crossing residential areas | N/A | ||||
| Secondary roads | N/A | ||||
| Local roads: passable to all transportation | Set to be equal to 4-wheeled motor vehicles, under the local assumption that motorcycles usually cannot travel faster than these vehicles on roads | N/A | |||
| Local roads: passable to motorcycle/bicycle | N/A | N/A | |||
| Local roads: walking only | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Summary of the original speed data sources and rationales from which the traveling speeds were derived per transportation and landcover type, for constructing a traveling scenario table required by AccessMod version 4.0 analysis modules to estimate the travel time and accessibility to existing emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Kigoma Region.
Travel Speeds, per Land Cover Type, to the Nearest Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, by Travel Scenario
| Land Cover Type | Travel Speeds (km/hr) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walking Scenario (Scenario 1) | Cycling Scenario (Scenario 2) | Motorcycle Scenario (Scenario 3) | Car Scenario (Scenario 4) | |||||||||||
| Forestland | 1.0 | – | 1.0 | – | – | 1.0 | – | – | 1.0 | – | – | |||
| Grassland | 1.7 | – | – | 7.0 | – | – | 7.0 | – | 1.7 | – | – | |||
| Cropland | 1.7 | – | 1.7 | – | – | 1.7 | – | – | 1.7 | – | – | |||
| Settlement | 2.5 | – | – | 7.0 | – | – | 7.0 | – | 2.5 | – | – | |||
| Other land cover | 2.5 | – | – | 7.0 | – | – | 7.0 | – | 2.5 | – | – | |||
| Boat route | – | 15.0 | – | – | 15.0 | – | – | 15.0 | – | – | 15.0 | |||
| Major roads | 2.5 | – | – | 10.0 | – | – | 40.2 | – | – | 50.0 | – | |||
| Major roads crossing residential areas | 2.5 | – | – | 10.0 | – | – | 26.2 | – | – | 30.0 | – | |||
| Secondary roads | 2.5 | – | – | 10.0 | – | – | 35.2 | – | – | 40.0 | – | |||
| Local roads: passable to all transportation | 2.5 | – | – | 10.0 | – | – | 15.0 | – | – | 15.0 | – | |||
| Local roads: passable to motorcycle/bicycle | 2.5 | – | – | 10.0 | – | – | 15.0 | – | 2.5 | – | – | |||
| Local roads: walking only | 2.5 | – | 2.5 | – | – | 2.5 | – | – | 2.5 | – | – | |||
a Tobler's function was used for correcting anisotropic movement.
Wetlands and rivers were considered to be impassable for the purposes of this analysis (i.e., walking speed of 0), and were not included in this table.
FIGURE 2Distribution of Estimated Travel Time to the Nearest Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Facility by Travel Scenario, Kigoma Region, Tanzania
Distribution of Estimated Proportion of Live Births Occurring in Each Travel Time Catchment by Travel Scenario, Kigoma Region, Tanzania, 2013
| Travel Time (min) | Walking Scenario (Scenario 1) No. (%) | Cycling Scenario (Scenario 2) No. (%) | Motorcycle Scenario (Scenario 3) No. (%) | Car Scenario (Scenario 4) No. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–30 | 1,263 (2) | 9,044 (11) | 17,418 (21) | 16,572 (20) |
| 31–60 | 3,172 (4) | 7,542 (9) | 16,487 (20) | 13,565 (16) |
| 61–90 | 3,451 (4) | 6,044 (7) | 13,320 (16) | 11,768 (14) |
| 91–120 | 3,123 (4) | 6,522 (8) | 8,001 (10) | 8,631 (10) |
| >120 | 71,980 (87) | 53,837 (65) | 27,763 (33) | 32,453 (39) |
a Walking scenario (Scenario 1) includes both walking and boat access. Cycling scenario (Scenario 2) includes walking, boat access, and bicycle access. Motorcycle scenario (Scenario 3) includes walking, boat access, and motorcycle access. Car scenario (Scenario 4) includes walking, boat access, and car access.
FIGURE 3Primary Transportation Modes Allowing Access to the Nearest Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Facility Within 2 Hours, Kigoma Region, Tanzania
FIGURE 4Percentage Distribution of Live Births With Poor Access to Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care Facilities, by District, for Each Travel Scenario in Kigoma Region, Tanzania