Literature DB >> 28838872

The Value of Short-Term Pain Relief in Predicting the Long-Term Outcome of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.

Holger Joswig1, Armin Neff2, Christina Ruppert3, Gerhard Hildebrandt4, Martin Nikolaus Stienen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous report demonstrated predictive power of short-term leg pain relief after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections for 1-month treatment response. The question whether the long-term response could be similarly predicted remained unanswered.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of 57 patients who underwent a transforaminal epidural steroid injection for sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation was followed for 24 months. Leg and back pain on the visual analog scale, health-related quality of life using the 12-Item Short Form Survey, and functional outcome using the Oswestry Disability Index were assessed. Responders were defined as not receiving any additional invasive treatment after a single injection. Patients who underwent a second injection or surgery were defined as treatment failures (nonresponders).
RESULTS: At 24 months, 31 (54.4%) patients were responders, and 26 (45.6%) were nonresponders. Nonresponders left follow-up at 1 month (n = 9), 3 months (n = 9), 6 months (n = 6) and 12 months (n = 2). No patients were injected again or operated on between the 12- and 24-month follow-up. Responders at 24 months had significantly lower visual analog scale leg pain (P < 0.05) than nonresponders starting from the second week after TFESI and better 12-Item Short Form Survey scores and less disability on the Oswestry Disability Index.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation who opt for a second injection or surgery do so within the first 6 months. Reliable prediction of the long-term treatment response based on short-term pain relief is not possible.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Long-term outcome; Lumbar disc herniation; Nerve root; Radicular pain; Transforaminal epidural steroid injection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838872     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Transforaminal epidural injection versus continued conservative care in acute sciatica (TEIAS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eduard Verheijen; Alexander G Munts; Oscar van Haagen; Dirk de Vries; Olaf Dekkers; Wilbert van den Hout; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.474

2.  Smartphone-Based Self-Assessment of Objective Functional Impairment (6-Minute Walking Test) in Patients Undergoing Epidural Steroid Injection.

Authors:  Anna Maria Zeitlberger; Marketa Sosnova; Michal Ziga; Valentin Steinsiepe; Oliver P Gautschi; Martin N Stienen; Nicolai Maldaner
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

3.  Transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with radio frequency for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Wen-Bo Wei; Sha-Jie Dang; Ling Wei; Tian Liu; Jue Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Effects of Local Anesthetics With or Without Steroids in High-Volume Transforaminal Epidural Blocks for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ji Seon Chae; Won-Joong Kim; Se Hee Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Effects of implementing evidence-based appropriateness guidelines for epidural steroid injection in chronic low back pain: the EAGER (Esi Appropriateness GuidElines pRotocol) study.

Authors:  Scott M Johnson; Troy Hutchins; Miriam Peckham; Yoshimi Anzai; Elizabeth Ryals; H Christian Davidson; Lubdha Shah
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.