Literature DB >> 28838862

Health-related quality of life for everolimus versus placebo in patients with advanced, non-functional, well-differentiated gastrointestinal or lung neuroendocrine tumours (RADIANT-4): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Marianne E Pavel1, Simron Singh2, Jonathan R Strosberg3, Lida Bubuteishvili-Pacaud4, Evgeny Degtyarev4, Maureen P Neary5, Carlo Carnaghi6, Jiri Tomasek7, Edward Wolin8, Markus Raderer9, Harald Lahner10, Juan W Valle11, Rodney Pommier12, Eric Van Cutsem13, Margot E T Tesselaar14, Gianfranco Delle Fave15, Roberto Buzzoni16, Matthias Hunger17, Jennifer Eriksson18, David Cella19, Jean-François Ricci20, Nicola Fazio21, Matthew H Kulke22, James C Yao23.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 RADIANT-4 trial, everolimus increased progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced, progressive, non-functional, well-differentiated gastrointestinal or lung neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). We now report the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) secondary endpoint.
METHODS: RADIANT-4 is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 97 centres in 25 countries worldwide. Adults (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for the study if they had pathologically confirmed, advanced (unresectable or metastatic), non-functional, well-differentiated (grade 1 or 2) NETs of lung or gastrointestinal origin. Patients were randomly allocated (2:1) using block randomisation (block size of three) by an interactive voice response system to receive oral everolimus (10 mg per day) or placebo, both with best supportive care, with stratification by tumour origin, WHO performance status, and previous somatostatin analogue treatment. HRQOL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at baseline (visit 2, day 1), every 8 weeks (± 1 week) during the study for the first 12 months after randomisation, and every 12 weeks thereafter until study drug discontinuation. The primary endpoint, reported previously, was progression-free survival assessed by central review; HRQOL was a prespecified secondary endpoint. The prespecified secondary outcome measure was time to definitive deterioration (≥7 points) in FACT-G total score. Analyses were done on the full analysis set, consisting of all randomised patients, by intention to treat. Only data obtained while receiving the randomly allocated treatment were included in this analysis. Enrolment for RADIANT-4 was completed on Aug 23, 2013, but the trial is ongoing pending final analysis of the key secondary endpoint of overall survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01524783.
FINDINGS: Between April 3, 2012, and Aug 23, 2013, 302 patients were enrolled; 205 were randomly allocated everolimus and 97 were assigned placebo. At baseline, 193 (94%) of 205 patients assigned everolimus and 95 (98%) of 97 allocated placebo had completed either fully or partly the FACT-G questionnaire; at week 48, 70 (83%) of 84 patients assigned everolimus and 22 (85%) of 26 allocated placebo completed FACT-G. Median time to definitive deterioration in FACT-G total score was 11·27 months (95% CI 9·27-19·35) with everolimus and 9·23 months (5·52-not estimable) with placebo (adjusted hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·55-1·21; log-rank p=0·31).
INTERPRETATION: HRQOL was maintained for patients with advanced, non-functional, gastrointestinal or lung NETs, with no relevant differences noted between the everolimus and placebo groups. In view of the previous RADIANT-4 findings of longer progression-free survival with everolimus, our findings suggest that everolimus delays disease progression while preserving overall HRQOL, even with the usual toxic effects related to active targeted drug treatment for cancer. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838862     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30471-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  28 in total

Review 1.  Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dichotomy, Origin and Classifications.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-10-16

2.  Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Charton; B Cuer; F Cottone; F Efficace; C Touraine; Z Hamidou; F Fiteni; F Bonnetain; M-C Woronoff-Lemsi; C Bascoul-Mollevi; A Anota
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With 177Lu-Dotatate in the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan Strosberg; Edward Wolin; Beth Chasen; Matthew Kulke; David Bushnell; Martyn Caplin; Richard P Baum; Pamela Kunz; Timothy Hobday; Andrew Hendifar; Kjell Oberg; Maribel Lopera Sierra; Thomas Thevenet; Ines Margalet; Philippe Ruszniewski; Eric Krenning
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Quality of life in patients with midgut NET following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Milka Marinova; Martin Mücke; Felix Fischer; Markus Essler; Henning Cuhls; Lukas Radbruch; Shiwa Ghaei; Rupert Conrad; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 6.  Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Hideaki Takahashi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Izumi Ohno; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Kazuo Watanabe; Kumiko Umemoto; Gen Kimura; Yuko Suzuki; Motoyasu Kan; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-02

Review 7.  Targeted Therapies in the Management of Well-Differentiated Digestive and Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Namrata Vijayvergia; Arvind Dasari
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-10-07

8.  Surgery Provides Long-Term Survival in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Resection for Non-Hormonal Symptoms.

Authors:  Jeffery Chakedis; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola-Smith; Clifford Cho; Megan Beems; Timothy M Pawlik; Shishir K Maithel; Carl R Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  The Evolving Treatment Algorithm for Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diversity and Commonalities Across Tumor Types.

Authors:  Andrew E Hendifar; Deepti Dhall; Jonathan R Strosberg
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-13

10.  Therapeutic Options for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reto M Kaderli; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Martin A Walter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.