| Literature DB >> 28838812 |
Lívia Fabiana Braga1, Fênix Araújo de Oliveira1, Eva Aparecida Prado do Couto1, Karina Freire d'Eça Nogueira Santos1, Enderson Petrônio de Brito Ferreira2, Claudia Cristina Garcia Martin-Didonet1.
Abstract
This work aimed to characterize 20 isolates obtained from upland rice plants, based on phenotypic (morphology, enzymatic activity, inorganic phosphate solubilization, carbon source use, antagonism), genotypic assays (16S rRNA sequencing) and plant growth promotion. Results showed a great morphological, metabolic and genetic variability among bacterial isolates. All isolates showed positive activity for catalase and protease enzymes and, 90% of the isolates showed positive activity for amylase, catalase and, nitrogenase. All isolates were able to metabolize sucrose and malic acid in contrast with mannitol, which was metabolized only by one isolate. For the other carbon sources, we observed a great variability in its use by the isolates. Most isolates showed antibiosis against Rhizoctonia solani (75%) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (55%) and, 50% of them showed antibiosis against both pathogens. Six isolates showed simultaneous ability of antibiosis, inorganic phosphate solubilization and protease activity. Based on phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene all the isolates belong to Bacillus genus. Under greenhouse conditions, two isolates (S4 and S22) improved to about 24%, 25%, 30% and 31% the Total N, leaf area, shoot dry weight and root dry weight, respectively, of rice plants, indicating that they should be tested for this ability under field conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Associative bacteria; Bacterial diversity; Oryza sativa; PGPR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28838812 PMCID: PMC5790645 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Morphological characteristics on King B medium of endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants.
| Groups | Isolate | Shape | Border | Surface | Consistence | Elevation | Gram |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | S2 | I | W | R | D | F | − |
| A | S4 | I | W | R | D | F | − |
| A | S6A | I | W | R | D | F | − |
| A | S39 | I | W | R | D | F | − |
| A | S97 | I | W | R | D | F | − |
| B | S5 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S6 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S8A | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S8B | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S17 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S32 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S35 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S37 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| B | S105 | I | W | R | D | F | + |
| C | S41 | C | S | G | A | H | − |
| C | S25 | C | S | G | A | H | − |
| D | S22 | C | S | G | A | H | + |
| D | S26 | C | S | G | A | H | + |
| D | S29 | C | S | G | A | H | + |
| D | S63 | C | S | G | A | H | + |
I, irregular; C, circular; W, wrinkled; S, smooth; R, rough; G, gentle; D, dry; A, aqueous; F, flat, H, high.
Metabolic characteristics of endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants.
| Evaluations | Isolates | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S2 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S6A | S8A | S8B | S17 | S22 | S25 | S26 | S29 | S32 | S35 | S37 | S39 | S41 | S63 | S97 | S105 | |
| Sucrose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Glucose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − |
| Fructose | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Mannitol | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Sorbitol | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| Mio-inositol | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | − |
| Arabinose | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + |
| Maleic acid | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − |
| Nicotinic acid | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Malic acid | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cellulase | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Amylase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Protease | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Phosphatase | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Urease | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
| Nitrogenase | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| Reductase nitrate | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| Citrate lyase | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Solubilization index (SI) for inorganic phosphate assayed in Pikovskaya medium, protease enzymatic index (PEI) and antibiosis assays against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Ss) and Rhizoctonia solani (Rs) of endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants. Mean values of three replicates.
| Isolate | SI (%) | PEI | Antibiosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ss | Rs | |||
| S2 | 133.86 (±16.9) | 2.03 (±0.15) | − | − |
| S4 | 126.94 (±13.7) | 2.52 (±0.22) | − | + |
| S5 | 133.60 (±14.5) | 1.98 (±0.04) | − | − |
| S6 | 130.56 (±4.8) | 3.04 (±0.06) | − | + |
| S6A | 116.78 (±9.8) | 1.88 (±0.18) | + | + |
| S8A | 119.63 (±2.8) | 1.57 (±0.10) | − | − |
| S8B | 0 | 1.88 (±0.05) | − | − |
| S17 | 117.10 (±7) | 2.21 (±0.22) | − | + |
| S22 | 131.02 (±7.9) | 1.67 (±0.01) | + | − |
| S25 | 129.17 (±19) | 1.91 (±0.17) | + | + |
| S26 | 114.95 (±4.3) | 1.96 (±0.13) | + | + |
| S29 | 123.15 (±11.2) | 2.36 (±0.15) | + | + |
| S32 | 119.39 (±10) | 1.96 (±0.34) | + | + |
| S35 | 120.20 (±6.1) | 1.61 (±0.13) | + | + |
| S37 | 117.78 (±1.9) | 2.19 (±0.07) | + | + |
| S39 | 116.06 (±5.3) | 1.96 (±0.13) | − | − |
| S41 | 128.52 (±5.7) | 1.89 (±0.07) | + | + |
| S63 | 0 | 1.57 (±0.10) | − | + |
| S97 | 116.74 (±8.4) | 1.73 (±0.07) | + | + |
| S105 | 126.52 (±9.1) | 1.35 (±0.08) | + | + |
Fig. 1Consensus dendrogram obtained by combining the morphological, enzymatic activity, carbon source use and antibiosis data among 20 endophytic isolates obtained from upland rice plants. Dendrogram was generated by the algorithm UPGMA and similarity matrix obtained from the use of Jaccard coefficient.
Fig. 2Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 16S rRNA gene showing the relationships among endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants (in bold) with different genera of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 20 nt substitutions per 1000 nt.
Fig. 3Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 16S rRNA gene showing the relationships among endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants (in bold) with Bacillus sp. reference strains. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 2 nt substitutions per 1000 nt.
Fig. 4Root development of upland rice cv. Aimoré as affected by endophytic isolates obtained from rice plants.
Effect of different isolates on the leaf area (LA), root dry weight (RDW), shoot dry weight (SDW) and total N (N-Total) of upland rice cv. Aimoré as compared to a no-inoculated treatment (NI). Mean values of four replicates.
| Treatments | RDW (g plant−1) | LA (cm2 plant−1) | SDW (g plant−1) | N-Total (mg plant−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S4 | 3.57 a | 678.63 a | 6.88 a | 217.48 a |
| S22 | 2.79 a | 601.01 a | 5.92 a | 218.02 a |
| S29 | 2.01 b | 462.35 b | 4.46 b | 161.72 b |
| S105 | 2.05 b | 561.68 a | 5.44 a | 219,06 a |
| NI | 2.16 b | 475.15 b | 4.45 b | 164.87 b |
| CV | 8.95 | 8.08 | 7.55 | 7.90 |
Values followed by the same letter within each column are not significantly different by the Skott–Knott test (p < 0.05).
CV = coefficient of variation.