Matthew L Hansen1, Amber Lin2, Carl Eriksson3, Mohamud Daya2, Bryan McNally4, Rongwei Fu5, David Yanez5, Dana Zive2, Craig Newgard2. 1. Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, United States. Electronic address: hansemat@ohsu.edu. 2. Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, United States. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, United States. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, United States; School of Public Health, Oregon Heath & Science University, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare odds of survival to hospital discharge among pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receiving either bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), supraglottic airway (SGA) or endotracheal intubation (ETI), after adjusting for the propensity to receive a given airway intervention. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) database from January 1 201-December 31, 2015. The CARES registry includes data on cardiac arrests from 17 statewide registries and approximately 55 additional US cities. We included patients less than18 years of age who suffered a non-traumatic OHCA and received a resuscitation attempt by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The key exposure was the airway management strategy (BVM, ETI, or SGA). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of the 3793 OHCA cases included from 405 EMS agencies, 1724 cases were analyzed after limiting the analysis to EMS agencies that used all 3 devices. Of the 1724, 781 (45.3%) were treated with BVM only, 727 (42.2%) ETI, and 215 (12.5%) SGA. Overall, 20.7% had ROSC and 10.9% survived to hospital discharge. After using a propensity score analysis, the odds ratio for survival to hospital discharge for ETI compared to BVM was 0.39 (95%CI 0.26-0.59) and for SGA compared to BVM was 0.32 (95% CI 0.12-0.84). These relationships were robust to the sensitivity analyses including complete case, EMS-agency matched, and age-stratified. CONCLUSIONS: BVM was associated with higher survival to hospital discharge compared to ETI and SGA. A large randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To compare odds of survival to hospital discharge among pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receiving either bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), supraglottic airway (SGA) or endotracheal intubation (ETI), after adjusting for the propensity to receive a given airway intervention. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) database from January 1 201-December 31, 2015. The CARES registry includes data on cardiac arrests from 17 statewide registries and approximately 55 additional US cities. We included patients less than18 years of age who suffered a non-traumatic OHCA and received a resuscitation attempt by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The key exposure was the airway management strategy (BVM, ETI, or SGA). The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of the 3793 OHCA cases included from 405 EMS agencies, 1724 cases were analyzed after limiting the analysis to EMS agencies that used all 3 devices. Of the 1724, 781 (45.3%) were treated with BVM only, 727 (42.2%) ETI, and 215 (12.5%) SGA. Overall, 20.7% had ROSC and 10.9% survived to hospital discharge. After using a propensity score analysis, the odds ratio for survival to hospital discharge for ETI compared to BVM was 0.39 (95%CI 0.26-0.59) and for SGA compared to BVM was 0.32 (95% CI 0.12-0.84). These relationships were robust to the sensitivity analyses including complete case, EMS-agency matched, and age-stratified. CONCLUSIONS:BVM was associated with higher survival to hospital discharge compared to ETI and SGA. A large randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Saswata Deb; Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; Dennis T Ko; C David Mazer; Alex Kiss; Stephen E Fremes Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Matthew Hansen; William Lambert; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Craig R Warden; N Clay Mann; Henry Wang Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: M Gausche; R J Lewis; S J Stratton; B E Haynes; C S Gunter; S M Goodrich; P D Poore; M D McCollough; D P Henderson; F D Pratt; J S Seidel Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Craig Newgard; Susan Malveau; Kristan Staudenmayer; N Ewen Wang; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; James F Holmes; Nathan Kuppermann; Jason S Haukoos; Eileen M Bulger; Mengtao Dai; Lawrence J Cook Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Mohamud R Daya; Robert H Schmicker; Dana M Zive; Thomas D Rea; Graham Nichol; Jason E Buick; Steven Brooks; Jim Christenson; Renee MacPhee; Alan Craig; Jon C Rittenberger; Daniel P Davis; Susanne May; Jane Wigginton; Henry Wang Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Kaashif A Ahmad; Cody L Henderson; Steven G Velasquez; Jaclyn M LeVan; Katy L Kohlleppel; Christina N Stine; Maria R Pierce; Utpal S Bhalala Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Ryan W Morgan; Matthew P Kirschen; Todd J Kilbaugh; Robert M Sutton; Alexis A Topjian Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 16.193