Lars Sondergaard1, Ole De Backer1, Klaus F Kofoed2, Hasan Jilaihawi3, Andreas Fuchs1, Tarun Chakravarty4, Mohammad Kashif4, Yoshio Kazuno4, Hiroyuki Kawamori4, Yoshio Maeno4, Gintautas Bieliauskas1, Hongfei Guo5, Gregg W Stone6, Raj Makkar4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Department of Cardiology and Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Cardiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530?1st Avenue, Skirball 9N, New York, NY 10016, USA. 4. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. 5. St. Jude Medical, 5050 Nathan Ln N, Plymouth, MN 55442, USA. 6. New York Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, The Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 111 East 59th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10022, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Four-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography (4DCT) has demonstrated instances of hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening (HALT) with or without hypo-attenuation affecting motion (HAM) after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation (TAVI, SAVR). The temporal pattern of evolution of these phenomena is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SAVORY registry enrolled patients treated by TAVI (n = 75) or SAVR (n = 30) with two 4DCT scans fully interpretable for HALT and HAM as well as unchanged anti-thrombotic medication between the scans. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the evolution of HALT and HAM while accounting for demographic and baseline variables, timing of both CT scans, valve type and antithrombotic therapy. The analysis population consisted of 84 patients, in whom first and second CT scans were performed at 140 ± 152 days and 298 ± 141 days after valve implantation, respectively. Hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening was noted in 32 patients (38.1%), with HAM in 17 (20.2%). Both findings were dynamic, showing progression in 13 (15.5%) and regression and 9 (10.7%) patients. Compared with antiplatelet therapy, progression was less likely among patients on oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (odds ratio: 0.014, P = 0.036). Maintenance on chronic oral anticoagulation was not a significant predictor of regression. These findings were similar for both transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. No patients developed symptoms of valve dysfunction and leaflet thickening was not clearly associated with any clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is a common finding after TAVI and SAVR, and may progress from normal leaflet over HALT to the more severe HAM. The phenomenon can develop and regress at variable intervals after valve implantation. Anticoagulants may have a protective effect against the development of HALT, but HALT can also regress without anticoagulation therapy. REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02426307. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Four-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography (4DCT) has demonstrated instances of hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening (HALT) with or without hypo-attenuation affecting motion (HAM) after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation (TAVI, SAVR). The temporal pattern of evolution of these phenomena is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SAVORY registry enrolled patients treated by TAVI (n = 75) or SAVR (n = 30) with two 4DCT scans fully interpretable for HALT and HAM as well as unchanged anti-thrombotic medication between the scans. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the evolution of HALT and HAM while accounting for demographic and baseline variables, timing of both CT scans, valve type and antithrombotic therapy. The analysis population consisted of 84 patients, in whom first and second CT scans were performed at 140 ± 152 days and 298 ± 141 days after valve implantation, respectively. Hypo-attenuating leaflet thickening was noted in 32 patients (38.1%), with HAM in 17 (20.2%). Both findings were dynamic, showing progression in 13 (15.5%) and regression and 9 (10.7%) patients. Compared with antiplatelet therapy, progression was less likely among patients on oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (odds ratio: 0.014, P = 0.036). Maintenance on chronic oral anticoagulation was not a significant predictor of regression. These findings were similar for both transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves. No patients developed symptoms of valve dysfunction and leaflet thickening was not clearly associated with any clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is a common finding after TAVI and SAVR, and may progress from normal leaflet over HALT to the more severe HAM. The phenomenon can develop and regress at variable intervals after valve implantation. Anticoagulants may have a protective effect against the development of HALT, but HALT can also regress without anticoagulation therapy. REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02426307. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-04
Authors: Manuel Hein; Jan Minners; Nikolaus Jander; Philipp Breitbart; Christian Stratz; Gregor Pache; Franz-Josef Neumann; Philipp Ruile Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 5.460