Literature DB >> 28837729

Analyzing and Predicting Visual Acuity Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy by a Longitudinal Mixed Effects Model of Imaging and Clinical Data.

Wolf-Dieter Vogl1,2, Sebastian M Waldstein2, Bianca S Gerendas2, Thomas Schlegl1,2, Georg Langs1, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth2.   

Abstract

Purpose: We develop a longitudinal statistical model describing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes in anti-VEGF therapy in relation to imaging data, and predict the future BCVA outcome for individual patients by combining population-wide trends and initial subject-specific time points.
Methods: Automatic segmentation algorithms were used to measure intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal (SRF) fluid volume on monthly spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans of eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) receiving standardized anti-VEGF treatment. The trajectory of BCVA over time was modeled as a multivariable repeated-measure mixed-effects regression model including fluid volumes as covariates. Subject-specific BCVA trajectories and final treatment outcomes were predicted using a population-wide model and individual observations from early follow-up.
Results: A total of 193 eyes (one per patient, 12-month follow-up, 2420 visits) were analyzed. The population-wide mixed model revealed that the impact of fluid on BCVA is highest for IRF in the central millimeter around the fovea, with -31.17 letters/mm3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -39.70 to -23.32), followed by SRF in the central millimeter, with -17.50 letters/mm3 (-31.17 to -4.60) and by IRF in the parafovea, with -2.87 letters/mm3 (-4.71 to -0.44). The influence of SRF in the parafoveal area was -1.24 letters/mm3 (-3.37-1.05). The conditional R2 of the model, including subject-specific deviations, was 0.887. The marginal R2 considering the population-wide trend and fluid changes was 0.109. BCVA at 1 year could be predicted for an individual patient after three visits with a mean absolute error of six letters and a predicted R2 of 0.658 using imaging information. Conclusions: The mixed-effects model revealed that retinal fluid volumes and population-wide trend only explains a small proportion of the variation in BCVA. Individual BCVA outcomes after 1 year could be predicted from initial BCVA and fluid measurements combined with the population-wide model. Accounting for fluid in the predictive model increased prediction accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28837729     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Screening and management of retinal diseases using digital medicine].

Authors:  B S Gerendas; S M Waldstein; U Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Quantification of Fluid Resolution and Visual Acuity Gain in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Using Deep Learning: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philipp K Roberts; Wolf-Dieter Vogl; Bianca S Gerendas; Adam R Glassman; Hrvoje Bogunovic; Lee M Jampol; Ursula M Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Distribution of OCT Features within Areas of Macular Atrophy or Scar after 2 Years of Anti-VEGF Treatment for Neovascular AMD in CATT.

Authors:  Cynthia A Toth; Vincent Tai; Maxwell Pistilli; Stephanie J Chiu; Katrina P Winter; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Gui-Shuang Ying; Sina Farsiu; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2018-12-03

4.  Pre-treatment clinical features in central retinal vein occlusion that predict visual outcome following intravitreal ranibizumab.

Authors:  Kerr Brogan; Monica Precup; Amanda Rodger; David Young; David Francis Gilmour
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 5.  Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Rene Y Choi; Aaron S Coyner; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Michael F Chiang; J Peter Campbell
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Expert-level Automated Biomarker Identification in Optical Coherence Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Thomas Kurmann; Siqing Yu; Pablo Márquez-Neila; Andreas Ebneter; Martin Zinkernagel; Marion R Munk; Sebastian Wolf; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A serum metabolomics study of patients with nAMD in response to anti-VEGF therapy.

Authors:  Yan Gao; Yi Chong Kelvin Teo; Roger W Beuerman; Tien Yin Wong; Lei Zhou; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessment of patient specific information in the wild on fundus photography and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Marion R Munk; Thomas Kurmann; Pablo Márquez-Neila; Martin S Zinkernagel; Sebastian Wolf; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.