| Literature DB >> 28837661 |
Anna A Hippmann1, Nina Schuback1, Kyung-Mee Moon2, John P McCrow3, Andrew E Allen3, Leonard J Foster2, Beverley R Green4, Maria T Maldonado1.
Abstract
There is an intricate interaction between iron (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28837661 PMCID: PMC5570362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Copper dependent growth rates of Thalassiosira oceanica TO03 and TO05.
Mean values ± standard error are shown; numbers of biological replicates (n) are indicated in brackets. Note that TO05 was not able to grow under 1.96 nM Cu in the medium (indicated by X in the graph). Given the scope of this study, TO03 was not grown under 1.96 nM or 6.08 nM, as it was able to grow under Cu concentrations <1 nM.
Fig 2The effects of Cu limitation on growth rate, cell diameter, protein content and a series of photophysiological parameters in two strains of T. oceanica.
2A-C, growthrate, cell diameter, and Chla per cell, respectively; 2D-F, gross oxygen production, Fv/Fm, and the absorption cross section of PS II antennae, respectively; 2G-I, 14C PE curve parameters α, Pmax, and EK, respectively; 2J-L, ETRPSII PE curve parameters α, Pmax, and EK, respectively; 2M-O, conversion factor, NPQNSV, and cellular protein content, respectively. The values are mean ± std. error of three biological replicates. Differing letters above bars represent statistically significant changes (p < 0.05) using a 2-way ANOVA with post-hoc interaction analysis (see Methods for details). Note that both strains have the same physiological responses under metal replete conditions. Under low Cu conditions, only growth rate and cell size are significantly reduced in the same manner in both strains.
Fig 3Comparison between EST-mapped proteomics datasets of TO03 and TO05, emphasizing the similarity in their genomes.
A) Results for TO03 (plusEST). B) Results for TO05 (plusEST). The left side of the panel shows the proportion of identified predicted proteins coming from the TO05 genome vs. the TO03 transcriptome (ESTs). The right side of the panel shows the proportion of the different types of ESTs that have been mapped by the peptides coming from the LC-MS/MS. Even though we used the combined database including all known TO05 and TO03 predicted proteins, neither strain shows bias towards its own subset of proteins.
Fig 4A, Representative sequence alignment of predicted LHCs from : boxes indicate conserved residues; dotted lines show linkage between helix I and III; bold residues are predicted binding sites for Chl molecules. B, Cartoon of the predicted general LHC structure (grey) comprised of three membrane spanning helices within the thylakoid membrane (orange) and the lumenal N-terminus and stromal C-terminus [80].
Fig 5Phylogenetic tree of 48 predicted LHCs from the T. oceanica genome (CCMP 1005) aligned with 41 LHCs from T. pseudonana (CCMP 1335).
Boxed THAOC LHCs have been identified at the protein level in this study. LHCs in grey shaded boxes with bold, black letters are significantly down-regulated and those in black shaded boxes with bold, white letters are significantly up-regulated in response to low Cu in TO03. The only significantly regulated LHC in TO05 is THAOC_08587 (up), which aligns closest to TpFCP7 (Table 2). Numbers on nodes are based on PhyML alertSH, aBayes, and standard bootstrap (100 replicates) and are expressed as percentages. Bootstrap values below 65% are not shown.
Overview of expression of all putative LHCs in both strains of T. oceanica.
| clade | predicted | TO03 expressed | TO05 expressed | TO03 up | TO03 down |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 48 | 30 | 32 | 9 | 8 |
| Lhcf - Group I | 17 | 10 | 10 | - | 5 |
| Lhcf - Group II | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - |
| Lhcf - Group III | 9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| Lhcr | 10 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
| Lhcx | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | - |
| Lhcz | 2 | - | - | - | - |
| 17531 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - |
aclade assignment as per phylogenetic tree (Fig 5)
bfor full list of expressed LHCs see S2 Table
cup/down refers to significant differential expression as defined in methods
Significantly differentially expressed LHCs under chronic low Cu conditions.
| clade | gene name (NCBI) | closest homolog in Tp | TO03 sig regulated | TO05 sig regulated | Evidence for role in other diatoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lhcf—Group I | THAOC_06305 | TpLhcf | -10.34 | light harvesting | |
| THAOC_20854 | TpLhcf | -5.56 | light harvesting | ||
| THAOC_01208 | TpLhcf | -2.79 | |||
| THAOC_32932 | TpLhcf8 | -2.12 | light harvesting, trimers, oligomers [ | ||
| THAOC_37647 | TpLhcf | -2.04 | |||
| Lhcf—Group II | THAOC_09684 | TpLhcf11 | 4.83 | ||
| Lhcf—Group III | THAOC_06968 | TpFCP2 | -2.52 | in TP tightly bound to PSI [ | |
| THAOC_04469 | TpFCP4 | 2.06 | |||
| THAOC_05777 | TpFCP10 | 2.40 | |||
| THAOC_16345 | TpFCP4 | 2.68 | |||
| THAOC_08587 | TpFCP7 | 2.79 | 2.07 | close to haptophyte LHCs [ | |
| Lhcr | THAOC_07036 | TpLhcr13 | -6.57 | PS I light harvesting [ | |
| THAOC_35518 | TpLhcr10 | -2.55 | PS I light harvesting [ | ||
| THAOC_00550 | TpLhcr11 | 2.39 | PS I light harvesting [ | ||
| Lhcx | THAOC_08095 | TpLhcx7 | 2.76 | ||
| THAOC_09937 | TpLhcx1 | 3.29 | photoprotection, stress response, associated with both PS I + II, FCP trimers, oligo, or only loosely associated with membrane, facilitates NPQ [ | ||
| THAOC_31988 | TpLhcx1 | 3.29 |
Tp, Thalassiosira pseudonana
aas per phylogenetic tree (Fig 5)
bsignificant differential expression in original dataset as defined in methods, given in fold-change
csignificant differential expression in EST dataset as defined in methods, for Table showing all expressed LHCs and including differential expression in both original and EST datasets, see S2 Table
Differential expression of proteins involved in the photosynthetic electron transport chain (ETC) in response to chronic Cu limitation in T. oceanica.
| Part_of | gene name (NCBI) | Protein Description | differential expression | where encoded | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TO03 | TO05 | ||||
| THAOC_34020 | psb27-like, involved in Mn cluster formation | 1.73 | 1 | Nuc | |
| psbA | psbA, photosystem II protein D1 | -1.92 | -1.03 | C | |
| psbB | psbB, photosystem II CP47 reaction center protein | -1.61 | -1.1 | C | |
| 1.05 | C | ||||
| -1.01 | C | ||||
| -1.21 | C | ||||
| psbH | psbH, photosystem II reaction center protein H | -1.49 | C | ||
| THAOC_03193 | psbO, Mn-stabilizing protein | -1.41 | Nuc | ||
| THAOC_15373 | psbP, oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 (OEE2) | -1.03 | Nuc | ||
| Nuc | |||||
| THAOC_09685 | psbU-like, small extrinsic protein | 1.62 | 1.32 | Nuc | |
| psbV, THAOC_30541 | psbV, cytochrome c-550 | 1.07 | 1.18 | C | |
| psbY | psbY, photosystem II protein Y | -1.11 | C | ||
| petA | petA, cytochrome f | -1.63 | -1.11 | C | |
| C | |||||
| THAOC_33417 | petC, Fe-S subunit (Rieske protein) | -1.51 | Nuc | ||
| petD, THAOC_24366 | petD, cytochrome b6-f complex subunit 4 | 1.1 | C | ||
| 1.31 | Nuc | ||||
| psaA | psaA, photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1 | -1.21 | 1.14 | C | |
| psaB | psaB, photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A2 | 1.11 | 1.01 | C | |
| psaC | psaC, photosystem I iron-sulfur center | -1.18 | 1.2 | C | |
| psaD, THAOC_24369 | psaD, photosystem I reaction centre subunit II | 1.2 | 1 | C | |
| psaF | psaF, photosystem I reaction centre subunit III | -1.2 | 1.04 | C | |
| THAOC_24361 | psaL, photosystem I reaction centre subunit XI | -1.56 | -1.02 | C | |
| -1.1 | Nuc | ||||
| Nuc | |||||
| THAOC_06509 | petH—FNR—ferredoxin—NADP+ reductase | -1.13 | Nuc | ||
PSII, photosystem II; PET, photosynthetic electron transport; PSI, photosystem I, Nuc, nucleus; C, chloroplast
acontent in bolt indicates significantly differentially expressed proteins in TO03, as defined in methods
bdifferential expression given in fold-change of original dataset; for Table including differential expression in EST dataset, see S3 Table
Fig 6Model of the changes of the photosynthetic apparatus in T. oceanica (CCMP 1003) in response to growth in the presence of low Cu compared to optimal Cu levels (control).
In the process of acclimation to low Cu concentration, several structural rearrangements take place in the photosynthetic apparatus allowing maximal photosynthetic efficiency and minimal photoinhibition. In our model, the represented changes in the numbers of LHCs, protein complexes and electron carriers are a reflection of the changes we observed in the proteomic data (see Table 3 for details): Overall cellular concentrations of proteins associated with PSII, and the photosynthetic electron transport chain (PSII, cytbf complex and plastocyanin) decrease, whereas those associated with PSI remain unchanged, and the size of the plastoquinone pool increases. In general, cellular Chla concentration stays constant with an increase in the absorption cross section σPSII. NPQ increases dramatically as reflected in both a) quenching sites Q1 and Q2 located in detached oligomers (DLHCs) and b) trimers with diatoxanthin (Dt) binding Lhcx that are bound to PSII, respectively (NPQ response adapted from [97]). Approximate pigment content per LHC monomer is 8 Fucoxanthin, 4–6 Chla, 2 Chlc (as per [98]). For more details see “Proteomic shift within the photosynthetic apparatus in TO03” in the discussion.