Literature DB >> 28837026

A comparison between a new vitrification protocol and the slow freezing method in the cryopreservation of prepubertal testicular tissue.

Moacir R M Radaelli1,2,3, Carlos G Almodin3, Vânia C Minguetti-Câmara3, Paula Motta Almodin Cerialli3, Aissar E Nassif1, Antonio J Gonçalves2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare a new vitrification protocol with reduced cryoprotectant exposure to the slow freezing method in the cryopreservation of prepubertal rat testicular tissue.
METHODS: Five sexually immature male Wistar rats were submitted to bilateral orchiectomy. Tissue samples from each testicle were fragmented into small pieces and randomly assigned to three groups: Group A, fresh tissue (control); Group B, slow programmable freezing (SPF); and Group C (vitrification). Frozen/thawed, vitrified/warmed, and fresh testicular tissue were histologically compared. A pathologist blinded to the procedures assessed the morphology (cell differentiation, nuclei, and epithelium) of 10 seminiferous tubules from each testicle (100 tubules per Group).
RESULTS: Sertoli and spermatogonial stem cells were easily differentiated, and the nucleoli were easily viewed in the tubules assessed in all three groups. Small alterations in tissue architecture were observed in the control group as a result of tissue handling. Moderate alterations of the epithelium with the formation of small gaps and cell detachment from the basement membrane were observed in 28% of the frozen and 9% of the vitrified tubules. Condensed nuclei involving a small proportion of cells were observed in six and three tubules of the frozen and vitrified group, respectively. Despite the alterations, 97% of the frozen and 99% of the vitrified tubules were considered well preserved.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the vitrification protocol tested in this study adequately preserved the morphological integrity of prepubertal testicular tissue in a rat model. Further studies are required to confirm testicular tissue function after grafting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryopreservation; cell; rat; testicle; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28837026      PMCID: PMC5574639          DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod        ISSN: 1517-5693


  32 in total

1.  The impact of childhood cancer on the United States and the world.

Authors:  W A Bleyer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?

Authors:  W Hamish B Wallace; Richard A Anderson; D Stewart Irvine
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Cryopreservation of human testicular diploid germ cell suspensions.

Authors:  R Sá; N Cremades; I Malheiro; M Sousa
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.775

4.  Cancer incidence and survival in European adolescents (1978-1997). Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project.

Authors:  C A Stiller; E Desandes; S E Danon; I Izarzugaza; A Ratiu; Z Vassileva-Valerianova; E Steliarova-Foucher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  The impact of chemotherapy on male fertility: a survey of the biologic basis and clinical aspects.

Authors:  M Schrader; M Müller; B Straub; K Miller
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Embryo development and gestation using fresh and vitrified oocytes.

Authors:  Carlos Gilberto Almodin; Vania Cibele Minguetti-Camara; Cassia Lopes Paixao; Priscila Cardoso Pereira
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Pregnancy outcome in long-term survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  J Blatt
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1999-07

Review 8.  Fertility preservation of boys undergoing anti-cancer therapy: a review of the existing situation and prospects for the future.

Authors:  I Aslam; S Fishel; H Moore; K Dowell; S Thornton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Semen analysis following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Additional data for evidence-based counselling.

Authors:  P Anserini; S Chiodi; S Spinelli; M Costa; N Conte; F Copello; A Bacigalupo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 10.  Male fertility following childhood cancer: current concepts and future therapies.

Authors:  Mark F H Brougham; Christopher J H Kelnar; Richard M Sharpe; W Hamish B Wallace
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.285

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current scenario and challenges ahead in application of spermatogonial stem cell technology in livestock.

Authors:  Balakrishnan Binsila; Sellappan Selvaraju; Rajan Ranjithkumaran; Santhanahalli Siddalingappa Archana; Balaganur Krishnappa; Subrata Kumar Ghosh; Harendra Kumar; Raghavendra B Subbarao; Arunachalam Arangasamy; Raghavendra Bhatta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Vitrification technique for female germinative tissue cryopreservation and banking.

Authors:  Carlos Gilberto Almodin; Moacir Rafael Radaelli; Paula Motta Almodin; Vânia Cibelle Mingetti-Câmara; Carla Graziele da Silva
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.