Literature DB >> 28836764

Intrinsic Differences in Backbone Dynamics between Wild Type and DNA-Contact Mutants of the p53 DNA Binding Domain Revealed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Juhi A Rasquinha1, Aritra Bej1, Shraboni Dutta1, Sujoy Mukherjee1.   

Abstract

Mutations in p53's DNA binding domain (p53DBD) are associated with 50% of all cancers, making it an essential system to investigate and understand the genesis and progression of cancer. In this work, we studied the changes in the structure and dynamics of wild type p53DBD in comparison with two of its "hot-spot" DNA-contact mutants, R248Q and R273H, by analysis of backbone amide chemical shift perturbations and 15N spin relaxation measurements. The results of amide chemical shift changes indicated significantly more perturbations in the R273H mutant than in wild type and R248Q p53DBD. Analysis of 15N spin relaxation rates and the resulting nuclear magnetic resonance order parameters suggests that for most parts, the R248Q mutant exhibits limited conformational flexibility and is similar to the wild type protein. In contrast, R273H showed significant backbone dynamics extending up to its β-sandwich scaffold in addition to motions along the DNA binding interface. Furthermore, comparison of rotational correlation times between the mutants suggests that the R273H mutant, with a higher correlation time, forms an enlarged structural fold in comparison to the R248Q mutant and wild type p53DBD. Finally, we identify three regions in these proteins that show conformational flexibility to varying degrees, which suggests that the R273H mutant, in addition to being a DNA-contact mutation, exhibits properties of a conformational mutant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836764     DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  3 in total

1.  Protein mimetic amyloid inhibitor potently abrogates cancer-associated mutant p53 aggregation and restores tumor suppressor function.

Authors:  L Palanikumar; Laura Karpauskaite; Mohamed Al-Sayegh; Ibrahim Chehade; Maheen Alam; Sarah Hassan; Debabrata Maity; Liaqat Ali; Mona Kalmouni; Yamanappa Hunashal; Jemil Ahmed; Tatiana Houhou; Shake Karapetyan; Zackary Falls; Ram Samudrala; Renu Pasricha; Gennaro Esposito; Ahmed J Afzal; Andrew D Hamilton; Sunil Kumar; Mazin Magzoub
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Follow the Mutations: Toward Class-Specific, Small-Molecule Reactivation of p53.

Authors:  Stewart N Loh
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-14

3.  Markov state models and NMR uncover an overlooked allosteric loop in p53.

Authors:  Emilia P Barros; Özlem Demir; Jenaro Soto; Melanie J Cocco; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.