Vida Sadat Kazemein Jasemi1, Firooz Samadi1, Hussein Eimani2,3, Saeed Hasani1, Rouhollah Fathi2, Abdolhossein Shahverdi2. 1. Department of Animal and Poultry Physiology, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan, Iran. 2. Department of Embryology, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: eimanih@royaninstitute.org.
Ovarian tissue transplantation is an option for
fertility preservation. Usually, ovarian tissue
transplantation is performed by re-implanting the
tissue in the body of donor animal (autograft), to
a recipient of the same species as donor (allograft)
or to a recipient from a species different from the
donor (xenograft) (1). Ovarian tissue pieces can
be grafted to their original location (such as the
ovarian cortex and the peritoneum under the ovary
hilus) (2, 3), which would allow pregnancy devoid
of further medical assistance (4), or in other places
(for example, the right abdominal muscle, kidney
and uterus) (5, 6). Ovarian transplantation into the
testis was first done by Sand (7), which resulted
in growth of follicles until maturation stage. Takewaki (8) also reported the survival of the ovarian
tissue transplanted into the testis for up to 2 months.
Ovarian transplantation into the testis may be a unique
technique for assessing the developmental potential of
the ovaries in a situation where the levels of folliclestimulating
hormone and luteinizing hormone are
significantly decreased, and may also be useful for
saving ovaries with genetic defects. However, little
information is available about using the testicular
tissue as a transplantation site.The key challenges dealing with transplantation
are tissue ischemia and delayed vascular
anastomosis after transplantation (9). Ischemic
damages and lack of blood flow to the tissue, which
leads to defects in the delivery of oxygen and
nutrients to the tissues, may destroy up to 70% of
the primordial follicles (10). To solve this problem,
many researchers have attempted to minimise the
length of time that the tissue must spend in an
ischemic state after ovarian transplantation. Some
studies have shown that magnetic field can help
prevent or repair damage caused by ischemia, and
may also be effective in reducing the occurrence
of the apoptosis (programmed cell death) and reestablishing
blood flow (11, 12). Therefore, the
purpose of the present study was to investigate the
effects of static magnetic field (SMF) on fresh and
vitrified ovarian tissues transplanted into the testis.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of mouse ovary and experimental
design
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran.
In this experimental study, sixty 6- to 8-weekold
female Naval Medical Research Institute
(NMRI) mice weighing 20 to 30 g were obtained
from the animal house of Royan Institute
(Tehran, Iran). They were kept at an appropriate
condition (18-22˚C, 12/12- hours light/dark
cycle) with free access to food and water. In
each repetition, the ovaries were removed
from the body and randomly divided into four
groups (fifteen ovaries in each group): i. Fresh
ovaries were immediately transplanted into the
testicular tissue (FOT group), ii. Fresh ovaries
were exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes
and then transplanted into the testicular tissue
(FOT+ group), iii. Vitrified-warmed ovaries
were transplanted into the testicular tissue
(VOT group), and iv. Vitrified-warmed ovaries
were transplanted into the testicular tissue and
the transplantation site was then exposed to a
magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group).
The magnetic field strength in all cases was 1
millitesla (mT).
Static magnetic field production
In the present study, an electromagnetic device
capable of producing a constant and uniform
magnet field of around 1 mT (Fig .1) was used. The
magnetic field was generated using two poles of
ferrite core, wrapped with 2,000 turn copper wire.
The input power of the device was 220 volt AC (50
Hz) which was converted to 4 Ampere (A) direct
current for the wire coil to generate a uniform
magnetic flux between the poles.
Fig.1
Image of the static magnetic field generating system. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the
transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group).
Image of the static magnetic field generating system. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the
transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group).
Vitrification and warming processes
The samples in experimental groups 3 and 4
were vitrified using Behbahanian’s vitrification
method with some modification (13). Briefly,
the ovaries were transferred into an equilibration
medium for 15 minutes at room temperature under
the influence of magnetic field. The ovaries were
then immediately immersed in a vitrification
medium for 30 minutes at 4˚C. After dehydration,
each ovary was plunged into liquid nitrogen by
using a cryopin, a needle of an insulin syringe
(14). For warming, the ovaries were transferred
to a warming medium for 10 minutes at room
temperature. All media used were prepared
according to Behbahanian et al. (13).
Ovarian transplantation into the testicular tissue
Sixty ovaries of female mice were transplanted
into 6- to 8-week-old NMRI male mice that
were not genetically identical. Briefly, after the
male mouse was anaesthetised (15), a gap with
length of approximately 1 cm was created in the
abdominal area, and the testis was exposed for
further manipulation. Subsequently, four-fifths of
seminiferous tubules were drawn away by suction
using a 20-gauge needle attached to a 20-mL
plastic syringe. The ovary was inserted into the
testis with sterile forceps. After transplantation,
the hole in the testis capsule was closed by suture,
and the testis was returned to its original location
in the body (16). The mice were allowed to live for
3 weeks.
Morphological evaluations and immunohistochemistry study
Three weeks after transplantation, 20 ovaries
from recipient testicles in four separate experiment
groups were removed. After casting in paraffin, the
ovaries were serially sectioned into 6 μm thickness
and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. All
stained ovarian sections were evaluated, and
the follicles were counted by a light microscope
(magnification of ×400). To prevent miscalculating
or counting the follicles more than once, only
those with an observable nucleus of oocytes were
counted. Follicles with pyknotic oocyte nucleus,
shriveled ooplasm or disorganized granulosa cells
were regarded as dead follicles (17). The number
of intact and dead follicles was counted according
to the study by Liu et al. (6).Anti-CD31 antibody (Ab28364, 1:100 dilution)
was tested to evaluate neo-vascularisation of the
grafted tissues. The liver tissue was used as positive
and negative controls for CD-31. Angiogenesis was
studied by counting and averaging blood vessels
using high-power field magnification (×400)
in three randomly selected fields per sample.
Immunohistochemical study was performed for antiactive
Caspase-3 antibody (Abcam, primary antibody
ab4051 and secondary antibody ab97051) according
to a protocol by Gao et al. (18). The thymus tissue was
used as positive and negative controls for caspase-3.
In this study, the follicles that contained caspase-3-
positive oocytes or more than 30% granulosa cells
were considered to be apoptotic follicles. In order to
quantify, 10 sections of each ovary was subjected to
immunohistochemistry.
Hormonal assays
For the next 21 days after transplantation, blood
samples were retrieved from the heart, and the
concentrations of estrogen (E2), progesterone
(P4) and testosterone (T4) were measured using
a chemiluminescence immunoassay analyser
(Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Germany). Blood
samples were collected from four mice in each
experimental group. Blood samples were also
collected from five non-grafted male mice agematched
with the transplanted animals to be used
as control sample.
Gonadotropin treatment and graft recovery
Follicular stimulation was carried out by injection
of pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin (Folligon,
Intervet, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) and human
chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Chorulon, Intervet)
hormones (19). Nineteen days after transplantation,
each mouse was administered intraperitoneally a dose
of 7.5 IU pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin and
a dose of 7.5 IU hCG 48 hours later. Twelve hours
after hCG injection, the mouse was killed by cervical
dislocation, and the ovary was removed from the male
mouse for oocyte isolation.
In vitro maturation of oocytes
The ovaries (n=40) were mechanically
dissected using an insulin syringe needle in Alpha
Modification of Minimum Essential Medium
Eagle (α-MEM) droplets supplemented with
10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotic solution (100 U/mL penicillin G and 100 mg/mL
streptomycin sulphate). To cultivate oocytes, a
solution containing α-MEM medium supplemented
with 100 mIU/mL recombinant human folliclestimulating
hormone (rhFSH, Gonal-f, Serono),
7.5 IU/mL hCG (Pregnyl, Organon) and 5% FBS
was used. After 16 hours of incubation, oocytes
with first polar body (as metaphase II) were picked
and transferred to a fertilization environment.
In vitro fertilization of oocytes and embryo
development
Approximately 7 to 10 of the metaphase II (MII)
mature oocytes were added to 100- to 150-μL
droplets of sperm suspension with a concentration
of 0.8×106 sperm per mL and then incubated for
at least 4 hours. After incubation, fused sperms
were separated from the oocytes with pipetting,
and oocytes with a released second polar body or
two pronuclei (2PN) were considered as fertilised
oocytes. 2PN embryos were transferred into T6
medium droplets supplemented with 4 mg/mL
bovineserum albumin. The cultured embryos were
checked and observed at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours
after fertilization.
Analysis of the data
SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA)
was used for statistical analysis. The number of
morphologically intact, dead and apoptotic follicles
in all experimental groups was compared by one-way
analysis of variance and Duncan’s test. P<0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Histological analysis
There were considerable differences in
morphologically intact and dead primordial follicles
between the FOT+ group and other groups (Tables1, 2). The mean percentages of morphologically
intact primordial follicles in the FOT+ (41.26% ±
0.54) group was significantly higher than those in
the FOT, VOT and VOT+ groups (34.88% ± 2.04,
24.82% ± 1.03 and 30.48% ± 1.38, respectively).
Furthermore, the VOT group had the lowest
percentage of intact primordial follicles (24.82%
± 1.03). The mean percentage of dead primordial
follicles in the FOT+ group (4.11% ± 2.88) showed
the highest preservation of small follicles, and this
was comparable to the FOT (12.88% ± 4.14) and
VOT+ (12.33% ± 2.74) groups. There were no
significant differences in intact primary follicles
between all the groups. Dead primary follicles had
a pattern similar to that of intact primary follicles,
except for the VOT group (17.24% ± 2.43) in
which the largest number of dead primary follicles
was seen. In addition, there was a comparative
difference in morphologically intact and dead
preantral follicles between the FOT (4.87% ± 0.58
and 3.31% ± 2.55, respectively) and VOT (7.67%
± 0.87 and 6.30% ± 2.78, respectively) groups, but
the difference was not significant when compared
with the FOT+ group (6.23% ± 1.20 and 3.99% ±
2.44, respectively) (Fig .2). The mean percentages
of intact and dead antral follicles were not
significantly different in all groups (Tables1, 2).
Table 1
Number of morphologically intact follicles (mean ± SEM) at different developmental stages 21 days after transplantation
Experimental group n=5
Primordial folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Primary folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Preantral folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Antral folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
436 (34.8 ± 2.04)b
352 (28.1 ± 1.58)
61 (4.8 ± 0.58)c
21 (1.7 ± 0.25)
FOT+
475 (41.3 ± 0.54)a
334 (28.9 ± 0.54)
70 (6.2 ± 1.20)b, c
23 (2.0 ± 0.44)
VOT
165 (24.8 ± 1.03)c
170 (25.6 ± 1.82)
50 (7.5 ± 0.87)a, b
15 (2.2 ± 0.56)
VOT+
190 (30.4 ± 1.38)b
153 (24.4 ± 1.57)
57 (9.1 ± 0.51)a
8 (2.2 ± 0.36)
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
Table 2
Number of morphologically dead follicles (mean ± SEM) at different developmental stages 21 days after transplantation
Experimental group n=5
Primordial folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Primary folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Preantral folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
Antral folliclen (Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
157 (12.8 ± 4.14)
156 (12.4 ± 4.20)
42 (3.3 ± 2.55)b
21 (1.7 ± 1.55)
FOT+
48 (4.11 ± 2.88)b
141 (12.2 ± 3.90)
45 (3.9 ± 2.44)b
14 (1.2 ± 1.77)
VOT
87 (13.37 ± 3.72)
116 (17.4 ± 2.43)a
42 (6.3 ± 2.78)a
18 (2.7 ± 1.47)
VOT+
77 (12.3 ± 2.74)
78 (12.4 ± 2.86)
48 (7.6 ± 1.33)a
8 (1.2 ± 0.90)
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
Fig.2
Morphology of mouse ovarian histological sections transplanted into the testis. A. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted
into the testicular tissue (FOT group), B. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into
the testicular tissue (FOT+ group), C. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and D. Vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10
minutes (VOT+ group). White arrow indicates preantral follicle. Yellow arrow indicates primary follicle. T indicates the host tissue (testis).
Green arrow indicates the host tissue spermatozoa (scale bars: 10 μm).
Number of morphologically intact follicles (mean ± SEM) at different developmental stages 21 days after transplantationFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).Number of morphologically dead follicles (mean ± SEM) at different developmental stages 21 days after transplantationFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).Morphology of mouse ovarian histological sections transplanted into the testis. A. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted
into the testicular tissue (FOT group), B. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into
the testicular tissue (FOT+ group), C. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and D. Vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10
minutes (VOT+ group). White arrow indicates preantral follicle. Yellow arrow indicates primary follicle. T indicates the host tissue (testis).
Green arrow indicates the host tissue spermatozoa (scale bars: 10 μm).
Quantitative study of angiogenesis
To estimate the effect of SMF on neoangiogenesis,
CD31 was identified in the
transplanted ovarian tissues. CD31 or platelet
endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (a 130-kd
membrane glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin
superfamily) has been identified as vascular cellspecific
cell-cell adhesion molecules. It localize to
endothelial cell intercellular junctions. There was
a clear difference in the alteration in the number
of blood vessels between the FOT+ (18.60 ± 0/51)
and VOT (7.80 ± 0/58) groups, but the presence
of blood vessels showed no significant difference
between the other groups (Table 3, Fig .3).
Table 3
New vascularisation based on CD31 expression in the transplanted tissue 3 weeks
after transplantation
Experimental group n=5
Number of blood vessels(Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
14.00 ± 0.70a, b
FOT+
18.60 ± 0.51a
VOT
7.80 ± 0.58b
VOT+
12.20 ± 0.86a, b
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+;
Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then
transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted
into the testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes.
Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
Fig.3
Immunohistochemical analysis for blood vessels (using the marker CD31) in the ovarian tissue transplanted into the testis. The
liver tissue was used as A. Positive and B. Negative controls for CD-31, C. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular
tissue (FOT group), D. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue
(FOT+ group), E. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and F. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were
transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group).
Black arrows indicate blood vessels (scale bars: 10 μm).
Prevalence of programmed cell death
Expression of the caspase-3 protein was not
observed in the cells of surface epithelium
and primordial and primary follicles, but
several apoptotic caspase-3-positive cells were
detected in the degenerating corpus luteum
(Fig .4). In the preantral and antral follicles, the
apoptosis incidence was different between the
VOT (4.20% ± 0.66 and 2.20% ± 0.37) and the
other groups, viz. the FOT (1.40% ± 0.24 and
0.8% ± 0.24), FOT+ (1.20% ± 0.20 and 0.60%
± 0.24) and VOT+ (2.20% ± 0.37 and 1.00% ±
0.31) groups (Table 4).
Fig.4
Immunohistochemical analysis for caspase-3 in the ovarian tissue transplanted into the testis. The thymus tissue was used
as A. Positive, B. Negative controls for caspase-3, C. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue (FOT
group), D. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue (FOT+
group), E. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and F. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were
transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+
group). Positive staining is shown as brown coloration of the cytoplasm of the cells, and white arrow indicates caspase-3 staining
(scale bars: 10 μm).
Table 4
Mean percentages of apoptotic follicles (%) at different developmental stages in transplanted mouse ovaries into testes
Experimental groupn=5
Total of folliclesn
Preantral follicles(Mean% ± SEM)
Antral follicles(Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
142
1.40 ± 0.24
0.8 ± 0.24
FOT+
149
1.20 ± 0.20
0.60 ± 0.24
VOT
71
4.20 ± 0.66a
2.20 ± 0.37a
VOT+
89
2.20 ± 0.37
1.00 ± 0.31
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
New vascularisation based on CD31 expression in the transplanted tissue 3 weeks
after transplantationFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+;
Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then
transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted
into the testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes.
Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).Mean percentages of apoptotic follicles (%) at different developmental stages in transplanted mouseovaries into testesFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic field
(SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular
tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to
an SMF for 10 minutes. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).Immunohistochemical analysis for blood vessels (using the marker CD31) in the ovarian tissue transplanted into the testis. The
liver tissue was used as A. Positive and B. Negative controls for CD-31, C. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular
tissue (FOT group), D. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue
(FOT+ group), E. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and F. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were
transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group).
Black arrows indicate blood vessels (scale bars: 10 μm).Immunohistochemical analysis for caspase-3 in the ovarian tissue transplanted into the testis. The thymus tissue was used
as A. Positive, B. Negative controls for caspase-3, C. Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue (FOT
group), D. Fresh ovaries were exposed to the magnetic field for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue (FOT+
group), E. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue (VOT group), and F. Vitrified-warmed ovaries were
transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to a magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+
group). Positive staining is shown as brown coloration of the cytoplasm of the cells, and white arrow indicates caspase-3 staining
(scale bars: 10 μm).
Hormonal assay
In grafted male mice, E2 and P4 concentrations
were significantly higher than those in control
mice. The experimental and control groups
showed notable differences in the plasma T4 level.
The control group showed the highest level of T4 (32.71 ± 0.95), which was significant compared
with those of the other groups. In addition, the
highest and lowest levels of T4 were observed in
the FOT+ (18.20 ± 0.58) and VOT (10.60 ± 0.74)
groups, respectively, but these differences were
not significant (Table 5). However, the VOT group
(0.04 ± 0.00) had the lowest testis weight 3 weeks
after transplantation, which was comparable to the
other control and experimental groups.
Table 5
Steroid hormones changes in male mice 21 days after ovarian transplantation
Experimental groupn=5
Testis weight (g)(Mean% ± SEM)
Estrogen (pmol/l)(Mean% ± SEM)
Progesterone (nmol/l)(Mean% ± SEM)
Testosterone (nmol/l)(Mean% ± SEM)
Control
0.135 ± 0.01
368.17 ± 26.14c
2.1 ± 5.42c
32.71 ± 0.95a
FOT
0.100 ± 0.00
571.60 ± 18.23a, b
73.40 ± 7.08b
14.40 ± 0.60
FOT+
0.122 ± 0.00
628.40 ± 30.06a
114.80 ± 6.21a
18.20 ± 0.58
VOT
0.04 ± 0.00b
495.73 ± 20.43b
41.43 ± 3.23b
10.60 ± 0.74
VOT +
0.09 ± 0.01
537.20 ± 30.19a, b
59.60 ± 10.48b
13.20 ± 1.06
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic
field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes, n; Number of mice in each experimental group. Values within a column with similar superscripts are
not significant (P<0.01).
In vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo
development
Progression to MII stage was significantly
higher in oocytes derived from the FOT+ group
(51.54% ± 2.87) than in those derived from
the other groups, while VOT group showed the
lowest comparative MΠ rate and the highest
total degeneration rate (14.28% ± 2.88 and
33.88% ± 3.47, respectively) (Table 6). The
fertility rate in the VOT group (30.00% ±
13.33) was significantly different from the
FOT and FOT+ groups (61.16% ± 5.68 and
69.83% ± 4.71, respectively). There was no
significant difference between the VOT+
(51.66% ± 3.88) and the other groups (Table
7) for the fertility rate. The rates of formation
of 2, 4 and 8-cell embryos in the VOT group
(30.00% ± 15.27, 10.00% ± 12.47 and 10.00%
± 12.47, respectively) were significantly lower
than those in the other groups. In addition, there
was a significant difference in the embryos that
reached the morula stage between the FOT+
(35.83% ± 4.97), VOT (0.00% ± 7.63) and
VOT+ groups (15.00% ± 0.00) (Table 8, Fig .5).
Table 6
Maturation of mouse oocytes recovered from the transplanted ovarian tissue into the testis after 24 hours culture in vitro
Experimental group n=5
Number of oocytesrecovered
Number of GV (Mean% ± SEM)
Number of GVBD(Mean% ± SEM)
Number of MΠ(Mean% ± SEM)
Number of degeneration(Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
70
10 (14.80 ± 2.01)b
21 (29.88 ± 4.24)
31(43.60 ± 2.51)b
8 (11.70 ± 2.90)
FOT+
79
12 (14.71 ± 2.26)b
17 (22.53 ± 3.38)
41 (51.54 ± 2.87)a
9 (11.20 ± 1.98)
VOT
67
18 (27.80 ± 3.44)a
16 (24.02 ± 3.04)
10 (14.28 ± 2.88)c
23 (33.88 ± 3.47)a
VOT+
68
16 (23.48 ± 3.00)a
13 (19.79 ± 2.73)
27 (39.59 ± 2.22)b
12 (17.11 ± 2.38)
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the SMF for 10 minutes
and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT+;
Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to an SMF for 10
minutes, SMF; Static magnetic field, GV; Germinal vesicle, GVBD; GV breakdown, and MΠ; Metaphase II. Values within a column with
similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
Table 7
Comparison of in vitro fertilization rate between the experimental groups
Experimental group
Number of MΠ
Number of 2PN(Mean% ± SEM)
FOT
31
19 (61.29 ± 5.68)a
FOT+
41
28 (68.29 ± 4.71)a
VOT
10
3 (30.00 ± 13.33)b
VOT+
27
14 (51.85 ± 3.88)a, b
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were
exposed to the static magnetic field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular
tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT+; Vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes, 2PN; 2 pronuclei, and MΠ; Metaphase II. Data are presented as
mean percent ± SEM. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).
Table 8
In vitro development of embryos after in vitro fertilization
Experimental group
Total
2-cell (%)
4-cell (%)
8-cell (%)
Morula (%)
FOT
70
91.66 ± 5.69
66.66 ± 10.82
55.00 ± 10.84
20.00 ± 6.93a, b
FOT+
79
92.50 ± 5.33
70.00 ± 5.85
55.55 ± 4.84
35.83 ± 4.97a
VOT
67
30.00 ± 15.27b
10.00 ± 12.47b
10.00 ± 12.47b
0.00 ± 7.63c
VOT+
68
80.00 ± 13.33
60.00 ± 10.00
40.00 ± 10.00
15.00 ± 0.00b, c
FOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic
field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes. Data are presented as mean percent ± SEM. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not
significant (P<0.05).
Fig.5
In vitro maturation, fertilization and cleavage of mouse germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes obtained from the ovarian tissue transplanted
into the testis. A. Mouse GV oocyte, B. Oocytes extruded a polar body after overnight in vitro maturation, C. Fertilised 2-pronuclear
zygote, and D-F. Development of oocytes derived from in vitro culturing after fertilization (scale bars: 10 μm).
Steroid hormones changes in male mice 21 days after ovarian transplantationFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic
field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes, n; Number of mice in each experimental group. Values within a column with similar superscripts are
not significant (P<0.01).Maturation of mouse oocytes recovered from the transplanted ovarian tissue into the testis after 24 hours culture in vitroFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the SMF for 10 minutes
and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT+;
Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then exposed to an SMF for 10
minutes, SMF; Static magnetic field, GV; Germinal vesicle, GVBD; GV breakdown, and MΠ; Metaphase II. Values within a column with
similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).Comparison of in vitro fertilization rate between the experimental groupsFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were
exposed to the static magnetic field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular
tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT+; Vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes, 2PN; 2 pronuclei, and MΠ; Metaphase II. Data are presented as
mean percent ± SEM. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not significant (P<0.05).In vitro development of embryos after in vitro fertilizationFOT; Fresh ovaries were immediately transplanted into the testicular tissue, FOT+; Fresh ovaries were exposed to the static magnetic
field (SMF) for 10 minutes and then transplanted into the testicular tissue, VOT; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the
testicular tissue, and VOT+; Vitrified-warmed ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue and the transplantation site was then
exposed to an SMF for 10 minutes. Data are presented as mean percent ± SEM. Values within a column with similar superscripts are not
significant (P<0.05).In vitro maturation, fertilization and cleavage of mouse germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes obtained from the ovarian tissue transplanted
into the testis. A. Mouse GV oocyte, B. Oocytes extruded a polar body after overnight in vitro maturation, C. Fertilised 2-pronuclear
zygote, and D-F. Development of oocytes derived from in vitro culturing after fertilization (scale bars: 10 μm).
Discussion
In the current study, the testis was used as an
alternative site for ovarian transplantation. Testis
has been recognised as an immunologically
privileged site that can enhance graft acceptance
(20). Studies have shown that Sertoli cells of the
testis express Fas ligand, which prevents graft
rejection (21). We therefore transplanted the ovary
into the testis without immunosuppression in male
mice to determine whether the testis provides
a unique environment for suppressing immune
responses and improving graft acceptance. The
study findings indicate that the environment of
adult testis promote normal development of the
follicles. These results are consistent with the
findings of Sato et al. (22), but differ from those of
a previous study (23).In addition, we studied the effect of SMFs
on ovarian transplantation; here we focused on
the study of the magnetic field itself, and to the
best of our knowledge, there have been no prior
studies on the effect of SMF on reproductive organ
transplantation. SMFs are generally classified on
the basis of intensity as weak (<1 mT), moderate
(1 mT to 1 T), strong (1-5 T), and ultrastrong (>5
T) (24). SMFs with moderate intensity have been
shown to be effective on biological systems (25).
Magnetic field therapy by means of moderateintensity
SMF could be beneficial for circulatory
diseases, including ischemic pain, inflammation
and hypertension, because of the modulation of
blood flow and/or blood pressure (26). Hence,
in this study, SMF with moderate intensity
was used during ovarian transplantation. The
study results showed the highest preservation
of primordial follicles in the group where fresh
ovarian tissue was exposed to the SMF before
transplantation. Healthier primordial follicles
were seen in the group of transplanted vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries (VOT+), when the transplantation
area was exposed to SMF, than in the VOT group
that was not subjected to SMF before and after
transplantation. It seems that using SMF during
ovarian transplantation can exert positive effects
and lead to better retention of ovarian follicles
after transplantation. An interesting observation
during histological evaluation was that in the FOT+
and VOT+ groups, it seemed that the testis was
able to produce sperm, even when follicles of the
transplanted ovarian tissue inside it were growing
and developing. In tissue sections, follicles with
good quality at different growth stages and corpus
luteum were observed, and blood vessels around
the grafts were clearly seen in all experimental
groups. However, in some transplanted ovaries,
injuries such as altered normal morphology
and oocyte degeneration were observed. These
changes in the VOT group were more specific.
Although a weak inflammation sign was observed
in all the experimental groups, the presence of
large granular lymphocytes and the resident
macrophages was not clear in tissue sections.
Griffith et al. (27) reported that the expression of
FasL in the testis can limit inflammation reactions
and confer immunoprivilege by allowing them to
kill infiltrating lymphocytes expressing Fas. In
addition, activated lymphocytes that co-express
Fas and FasL become susceptible to apoptosis.A previous study suggested that the rapid
establishment of a rich blood supply is one of
the most essential factors for successful ovarian
tissue transplantation and survival of the ovarian
follicles (28). We assessed angiogenesis in the
grafts by anti-mouseCD31 immunohistochemical
staining. Many newly formed blood vessels were
observed in the ovaries exposed to the SMF
before transplantation (although not statistically
significant). The smallest number of blood vessels
was seen in the VOT as compared to the FOT+
group. It has been reported that SMFs affect vessel
growth and development both in vitro and in vivo
(29). Similarly, Bassett showed that local exposure
to SMF leads to enhanced angiogenesis and
ossification in bone (30). It was also reported that
electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo
angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2
(31). In the present study, the SMF did not reduce
the number of blood vessels and angiogenesis.In some studies, correlation was observed
between increments in ovarian angiogenesis with
reduction in tissue hypoxia and programmed cell
death of follicles (32). In the previous reports, it
is stated that magnetic fields may delay cell death
caused by ischemia and reduce the size of the
ischemic penumbra by improving collateral blood
flow to the ischemic area (33). Fanelli et al. (34)
suggested that magnetic fields increase cell survival
by inhibiting apoptosis through modulation of Ca2+
influx. In contrast, some other researchers believe
that magnetic field increases apoptosis (35). The extent of this effect seems to depend on the cell
type, intensity and duration of the radiation field;
permeability of tissues; and other experimental
conditions (36, 37).In current study, we used caspase-3 as an
apoptosis marker, which in its active form is used
as a marker for apoptotic death in the early stages
of apoptosis (38, 39). A stained reddish brown
colour of the cytoplasm/nucleus of the follicles
was considered as positive (39). Evaluation of
apoptotic incidence on mouseovaries did not
present any caspase-3 positive follicles in the
stages of primordial and primary. These results
are contrary to previous research which reported
caspase-3 positive follicles in the stages of
primordial and primary (18).The study result showed that SMF with 1 mT
intensity does not increase apoptosis in ovarian
follicles. An improved follicular survival with
no increase in apoptosis was observed when the
ovarian tissues were exposed to SMF before
transplantation into the testes. In preantral and
antral follicles, after transplantation, the rate of
programmed cell death in the VOT group was
significantly higher than those in the other groups.
It should be noted that in the VOT group, a lower
angiogenesis rate was observed. Despite the
fact that in some cases, the differences were not
statistically significant between the groups, our
study results showed an association between the
increase in angiogenesis and apoptosis reduction.The study results demonstrate that the use of SMF
after ovarian tissue transplantation of vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries significantly improved the quality
of transplanted ovarian tissues by decreasing
apoptosis. These results are confirmed by previous
studies (34). For the fresh transplanted groups,
the difference was not statistically significant in
terms of programmed cell death, but there was an
obvious reduction in apoptosis in the FOT+ group.
However, the exact mechanism of the beneficial
effect of SMF is uncertain.To understand follicular and oocyte development,
we investigated the endocrine function of grafts in
male mice receiving ovarian tissues. The plasma
concentrations of E2 and P4 hormones in male mice
with ovarian transplants were significantly higher
than those in mice without ovarian transplants.
These data indicate hormone secretion by the
follicles in the grafted ovaries into the testes. These
results are similar to the results of Li et al. (40).The findings showed that follicles in grafted
ovarian tissue (both fresh and vitrified-warmed)
developed and the grafts had ample blood vessels.
One of the most important concerns about ovarian
transplantation into the testis is whether the implant
can ovulate oocytes in response to exogenous
gonadotropins (22); to address this concern, we
studied ovarian graft functionality by retrieving
oocytes for in vitro maturation followed by in vitro
fertilization by mature epididymal spermatozoa.
The rate of oocytes reaching MII stage was higher
in the FOT+ than in the other experimental groups,
whereas it was lowest in the VOT group. A higher
percentage of degenerated oocytes, low in vitro
fertilization and embryo development rates were
observed in the VOT group. The only difference
between the VOT and VOT+ groups was that the
application of a magnetic field after transplantation
in the VOT+ group exerts positive effects on embryo
development. In this study, an SMF was applied
during ovarian vitrification and transplantation.
During vitrification, the ovarian tissues were
exposed to a magnetic field for 15 minutes in the
equilibration step. After thawing, vitrified-warmed
tissues were transplanted into male mice (VOT
group). The apoptosis rate, oocyte maturation,
fertilization and in vitro embryonic development
of the FOT and VOT groups were significantly
different from each other. It was therefore decided
to determine the effect of SMF on vitrified-warmed
ovaries transplantation. For this, vitrified-warmed
ovaries were transplanted into the testicular tissue
and the transplantation site was then exposed to a
magnetic field for 10 minutes (VOT+ group). The
data showed that the use of SMF after vitrifiedwarmed
ovaries transplantation significantly
improved the maturation rate and embryonic
development (except morula). It also reduced the
apoptosis rate.
Conclusion
The testis can provide an environment for
improving ovarian graft acceptance. SMF
coupled with transplantation procedure increases
the survival rates of grafted ovarian follicles. In
addition, exposure of the vitrified-warmed ovaries
to SMF retains the structure of the graft similar to
that of fresh ovaries. Further studies are necessary
Ovarian Tissue Transplantation under Influence of SMF to determine the exact mechanism of SMF effects
on ovarian transplantation.
Authors: Laura Teodori; Jerzy Grabarek; Piotr Smolewski; Lina Ghibelli; Antonio Bergamaschi; Milena De Nicola; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz Journal: Cytometry Date: 2002-11-01
Authors: Oren M Tepper; Matthew J Callaghan; Edward I Chang; Robert D Galiano; Kirit A Bhatt; Samuel Baharestani; Jean Gan; Bruce Simon; Richard A Hopper; Jamie P Levine; Geoffrey C Gurtner Journal: FASEB J Date: 2004-06-18 Impact factor: 5.191