Ove Spreckelsen1, Andres Luque Ramos2, Michael Freitag3, Falk Hoffmann2. 1. Division General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Ammerländer Heerstrasse 140, Oldenburg, 26111, Germany. ove.spreckelsen@uni-oldenburg.de. 2. Division Outpatient Care and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany. 3. Division General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University, Ammerländer Heerstrasse 140, Oldenburg, 26111, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is highly recommended for nursing home residents. However, it is known that vaccination coverage is low in the general population. AIMS: We aim to find out whether influenza vaccination coverage differs for nursing home residents between the year before and after admission and factors determining the chance to receive vaccination. METHODS: Claims data of the health insurance fund DAK of at least 65-year-olds were used. The proportion of residents with influenza vaccination were compared in the year before and after the admission stratified by several covariates. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to obtain predictors for influenza vaccination after admission. RESULTS: Vaccination coverage was overall higher in the year after admission (53.0%) than before (38.3%). Differences in vaccination coverage between most covariates evened out after admission. Differences remained for region of residence and number of comorbidities. The strongest predictor for receiving a vaccination after admission was the vaccination status before admission (OR 3.5; 95% CI 3.3-3.6) followed by region and number of comorbidities. DISCUSSION: Overall, vaccination coverage of nursing home residents remains lower than recommended. Doctor-patient contacts whether due to care for comorbidities or as a continuation of the relation over the time of admission to the nursing home seem to assure vaccination for residents. CONCLUSION: Clear and unambiguous evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy for different subgroups within the same age group as well as organizational efforts to increase vaccination within nursing homes would be recommended.
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is highly recommended for nursing home residents. However, it is known that vaccination coverage is low in the general population. AIMS: We aim to find out whether influenza vaccination coverage differs for nursing home residents between the year before and after admission and factors determining the chance to receive vaccination. METHODS: Claims data of the health insurance fund DAK of at least 65-year-olds were used. The proportion of residents with influenza vaccination were compared in the year before and after the admission stratified by several covariates. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to obtain predictors for influenza vaccination after admission. RESULTS: Vaccination coverage was overall higher in the year after admission (53.0%) than before (38.3%). Differences in vaccination coverage between most covariates evened out after admission. Differences remained for region of residence and number of comorbidities. The strongest predictor for receiving a vaccination after admission was the vaccination status before admission (OR 3.5; 95% CI 3.3-3.6) followed by region and number of comorbidities. DISCUSSION: Overall, vaccination coverage of nursing home residents remains lower than recommended. Doctor-patient contacts whether due to care for comorbidities or as a continuation of the relation over the time of admission to the nursing home seem to assure vaccination for residents. CONCLUSION: Clear and unambiguous evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy for different subgroups within the same age group as well as organizational efforts to increase vaccination within nursing homes would be recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
General practice; Germany; Influenza; Nursing home; Vaccination
Authors: Reem T Mulla; Luke Andrew Turcotte; Nathalie Ih Wellens; Milou J Angevaare; Julie Weir; Micaela Jantzi; Paul C Hébert; George A Heckman; Hein van Hout; Nigel Millar; John P Hirdes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Pavo Marijic; Larissa Schwarzkopf; Werner Maier; Franziska Trudzinski; Lars Schwettmann; Michael Kreuter Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2022-09
Authors: Ove Spreckelsen; Guido Schmiemann; Michael H Freitag; Alexander M Fassmer; Bettina Engel; Falk Hoffmann Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 2.655