Literature DB >> 28836131

Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH).

Fernando Minguet1, Teresa M Salgado2, Claudio Santopadre3, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos4.   

Abstract

Background The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category is heterogeneous. The inclusion of journals with basic and clinical scopes, which have different citation patterns, compromises comparability of impact factors among journals within the category. Objective To subdivide the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into basic pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy based on the analyses of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as a proxy of journals' scopes. Setting JCR. Method All articles, and respective MeSH, published in 2013, 2014, and 2015 in all journals included in the 2014 JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy category were retrieved from PubMed. Several models using a combination of the 14 MeSH categories and specific MeSH tree branches were tested using hierarchical cluster analysis. Main outcome measure Distribution of journals across the subcategories of the JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category. Results A total of 107,847 articles from 214 journals were included. Nine different models combining the MeSH categories M (Persons) and N (Health Care) with specific MeSH tree branches (selected ad-hoc) and Pharmacy-specific MeSH (identified in previous research) consistently grouped 142 journals (66.4%) in homogeneous groups reflecting their basic and clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy scopes. Ultimately, journals were clustered into: 150 in basic pharmacology, 43 in clinical pharmacology, 16 in basic pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, and 5 in pharmacy. Conclusion The reformulation of the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into three categories was demonstrated by the consistent results obtained from testing nine different clustering models using the MeSH terms assigned to their articles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Classification; Cluster analysis; Journal Impact Factor; Medical subject headings; Pharmacy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836131     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0527-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  20 in total

1.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.

Authors:  D J PRICE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Not-so-deep impact.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  THE INTERNATIONAL CATALOGUE OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1895-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  Ludo Waltman; Nees Jan van Eck; Thed N van Leeuwen; Martijn S Visser; Anthony F J van Raan
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy.

Authors:  Fernando Minguet; Lucienne Van Den Boogerd; Teresa M Salgado; Cassyano J Correr; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.637

6.  [Use of citation analysis and other bibliometric methods in evaluation of the quality of research].

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1989-11-10

7.  [Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods].

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  Nord Med       Date:  1989

8.  Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals.

Authors:  Ryan W Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.637

9.  Measure for measure in science.

Authors:  G Taubes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Bradford's law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations.

Authors:  Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2016-09-15
View more
  6 in total

1.  Citations and science.

Authors:  J W Foppe van Mil; James Green
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-11-08

2.  Measuring the impact of CPJ on pharmacy practice.

Authors:  Trish Chatterley; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2017-10-24

3.  Long-term Association of Altmetric Attention Scores With Citations in Selected Major Pharmacy Journals.

Authors:  Dave L Dixon; William L Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore.

Authors:  Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2018-06-14

5.  Predicting article citations using data from 100 top-cited publications in the field of Psoriasis Vulgaris and biological agents (PVBA) since 1991: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Chieh-Hsun Chen; Tsair-Wei Chien; Sam Yu-Chieh Ho; Feng-Jie Lai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Evaluating the research domain and achievement for a productive researcher who published 114 sole-author articles: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Mei-Yuan Liu; Willy Chou; Tsair-Wei Chien; Shu-Chun Kuo; Yu-Tsen Yeh; Po-Hsin Chou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.