Literature DB >> 28836107

Neural Network Classifier for Automatic Detection of Invasive Versus Noninvasive Airway Management Technique Based on Respiratory Monitoring Parameters in a Pediatric Anesthesia.

Jorge A Gálvez1, Ali Jalali2, Luis Ahumada3, Allan F Simpao4, Mohamed A Rehman4.   

Abstract

Children undergoing general anesthesia require airway monitoring by an anesthesia provider. The airway may be supported with noninvasive devices such as face mask or invasive devices such as a laryngeal mask airway or an endotracheal tube. The physiologic data stored provides an opportunity to apply machine learning algorithms distinguish between these modes based on pattern recognition. We retrieved three data sets from patients receiving general anesthesia in 2015 with either mask, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube. Patients underwent myringotomy, tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy or inguinal hernia repair procedures. We retrieved measurements for end-tidal carbon dioxide, tidal volume, and peak inspiratory pressure and calculated statistical features for each data element per patient. We applied machine learning algorithms (decision tree, support vector machine, and neural network) to classify patients into noninvasive or invasive airway device support. We identified 300 patients per group (mask, laryngeal mask airway, and endotracheal tube) for a total of 900 patients. The neural network classifier performed better than the boosted trees and support vector machine classifiers based on the test data sets. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for neural network classification are 97.5%, 96.3%, and 95.8%. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of support vector machine are 89.1%, 92.3%, and 88.3% and with the boosted tree classifier they are 93.8%, 92.1%, and 91.4%. We describe a method to automatically distinguish between noninvasive and invasive airway device support in a pediatric surgical setting based on respiratory monitoring parameters. The results show that the neural network classifier algorithm can accurately classify noninvasive and invasive airway device support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithms; Intubation, intratracheal, masks; Laryngeal masks; Neural networks (computer)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836107     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0787-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of manual and automated documentation of adverse events with an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).

Authors:  M Benson; A Junger; A Michel; G Sciuk; L Quinzio; K Marquardt; G Hempelmann
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2000

2.  Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerized anesthesia records.

Authors:  D L Reich; R K Wood; R Mattar; M Krol; D C Adams; S Hossain; C A Bodian
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Drug error in anaesthetic practice: a review of 896 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study database.

Authors:  A Abeysekera; I J Bergman; M T Kluger; T G Short
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Prediction of periventricular leukomalacia occurrence in neonates after heart surgery.

Authors:  Ali Jalali; Erin M Buckley; Jennifer M Lynch; Peter J Schwab; Daniel J Licht; C Nataraj
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Making a difference: the Anesthesia Quality Institute.

Authors:  Richard P Dutton
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Anaesthesia and fatigue: an analysis of the first 10 years of the Australian Incident Monitoring Study 1987-1997.

Authors:  G P Morris; R W Morris
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  Automatic Detection of Endotracheal Intubation During the Anesthesia Procedure.

Authors:  Ali Jalali; Mohamed Rehman; Arul Lingappan; C Nataraj
Journal:  J Dyn Syst Meas Control       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Machine learning to predict extubation outcome in premature infants.

Authors:  Martina Mueller; Carol C Wagner; Romesh Stanislaus; Jonas S Almeida
Journal:  Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Netw       Date:  2013-08

9.  Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12,606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System.

Authors:  K Catchpole; M D D Bell; S Johnson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Predicting long-term outcome of Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder using fMRI and support vector machine learning.

Authors:  K N T Månsson; A Frick; C-J Boraxbekk; A F Marquand; S C R Williams; P Carlbring; G Andersson; T Furmark
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.