Literature DB >> 28835979

[Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR®) in patients with coronary artery disease].

S Baumann1,2, A C Schaefer3, A Hohneck3, K Mueller3, T Becher3, M Behnes3, M Renker4, M Borggrefe3, I Akin3, D Lossnitzer3.   

Abstract

Coronary angiography is considered as the gold standard in the morphological representation of coronary artery stenosis. Coronary angiography is often performed without preprocedural non-invasive proof of ischemia and the assessment of the severity of a coronary lesion by morphology is very subjective. Thus, invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement represents the current standard for estimation of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis and facilitates decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting. The FFR-guided revascularization strategy has been classified as a class IA recommendation in the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Both the DEFER and the FAME studies showed no treatment advantage of hemodynamically irrelevant stenosis. By use of FFR (and targeted interventions), clinical results could be improved as well as the procedure costs were reduced; however, the use in clinical practice is still limited due to the need of adenosine administration and a significant prolongation of the procedure. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR®) is a new innovative approach for the determination of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis which can be obtained at rest without the use of vasodilators. Regarding periprocedural complications as well as prognosis, iFR® showed non-inferiority compared to FFR in the SWEDEHEART and DEFINE-FLAIR trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Coronary stenosis; Fractional flow reserve; Ischemia; Revascularization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835979     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-017-4608-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  26 in total

1.  Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Javier Escaned; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Rodney A Foale; Rafael Mila; Jason Tarkin; Ricardo Petraco; Christopher Broyd; Richard Jabbour; Amarjit Sethi; Christopher S Baker; Micheal Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood Khan; David Lefroy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Carlo Di Mario; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Bernhard Bornschein; Pim A L Tonino; Raffaella M Gothe; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek; Julien I E Hoffman; Maria Siebes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Pepijn van Schaardenburgh; Ganesh Manoharan; Eric Boersma; Jan-Willem Bech; Marcel van't Veer; Frits Bär; Jan Hoorntje; Jacques Koolen; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Interobserver variability in grading of coronary arterial narrowings using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association grading criteria.

Authors:  N S Kleiman; A R Rodriguez; A E Raizner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Clinical validation of the resting pressure parameters in the assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis; results of an independent, blinded comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Jin Joo Park; Ricardo Petraco; Chang-Wook Nam; Joon-Hyung Doh; Justin Davies; Javier Escaned; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI.

Authors:  Matthias Götberg; Evald H Christiansen; Ingibjörg J Gudmundsdottir; Lennart Sandhall; Mikael Danielewicz; Lars Jakobsen; Sven-Erik Olsson; Patrik Öhagen; Hans Olsson; Elmir Omerovic; Fredrik Calais; Pontus Lindroos; Michael Maeng; Tim Tödt; Dimitrios Venetsanos; Stefan K James; Amra Kåregren; Margareta Nilsson; Jörg Carlsson; Dario Hauer; Jens Jensen; Ann-Charlotte Karlsson; Georgios Panayi; David Erlinge; Ole Fröbert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: results of the ADVISE in-practice: an international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ricardo Petraco; Rasha Al-Lamee; Matthias Gotberg; Andrew Sharp; Farrel Hellig; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Tim P van de Hoef; Sayan Sen; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Eric Van Belle; Waldemar Bojara; Kunihiro Sakoda; Martin Mates; Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Christian J Vrints; Steven Haine; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Flavio L Ribichini; Martjin Meuwissen; Hitoshi Matsuo; Luc Janssens; Ueno Katsumi; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Jan Piek; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study).

Authors:  Sayan Sen; Kaleab N Asrress; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ricardo Petraco; Iqbal S Malik; Rodney A Foale; Ghada W Mikhail; Nicolas Foin; Christopher Broyd; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Amarjit Sethi; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood A Khan; Muhammed Z Khawaja; Christopher S Baker; Michael Bellamy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Simon Redwood; Justin E Davies
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients.

Authors:  Colin Berry; Marcel van 't Veer; Nils Witt; Petr Kala; Otakar Bocek; Stylianos A Pyxaras; John D McClure; William F Fearon; Emanuele Barbato; Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Coronary physiology in the catheter laboratory].

Authors:  Stefan Baumann; Waldemar Bojara; Heiner Post; Tanja Rudolph; Tim Schäufele; Peter Ong; Ralf Lehmann; Constantin von Zur Mühlen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.443

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.