Literature DB >> 28835714

Surgical outcomes from limiting the use of nonabsorbable suture in tunica albuginea plication for Peyronie's disease.

D Papagiannopoulos1, J Phelps1, E Yura1, L A Levine1.   

Abstract

Tunica albuginea plication (TAP) surgery for Peyronie's disease (PD) is classically described using nonabsorbable suture. Many patients are aware of nodularity at the suture sites (50-88%), and some find them painful (10-33%). We explore whether limiting permanent sutures provides a durable correction of curve and report the incidence of bothersome nodules. Beginning in 2007, we modified our TAP procedure to limit the use of permanent sutures. We reviewed all patients who underwent TAP procedures from 2007 to 2014 at our institution. Patients were contacted to complete a previously published survey regarding postoperative satisfaction. In total, 142 PD patients underwent the TAP procedure and 81/142 (57%) completed the postoperative survey. Mean office follow-up and survey follow-up were 17.3 and 56.3 months, respectively. Of the surveyed patients, 6.2% complained of a bothersome residual curve, 19.8% experienced nodularity and 4.9% reported bothersome nodules. Men with dorsal curves experienced less painful nodularity than those with ventral (P=0.047) or lateral curves (P=0.017). In total, 4/142 (2.8%) of men underwent repeat intervention. At long-term follow-up, limiting permanent sutures during TAP procedures for PD is durable with respect to curvature correction and has encouragingly low levels of nodularity and bother at suture sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835714     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2017.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  13 in total

1.  To bury the knot, then, is better than not.

Authors:  Shai Shefi; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Yoram Mor; Gil Raviv; Jacob Ramon; Jacob I Hanani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Examining Postoperative Outcomes after Employing a Surgical Algorithm for Management of Peyronie's Disease: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Dimitri Papagiannopoulos; Emily Yura; Laurence Levine
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Congenital and acquired penile deviation treated with the essed plication method.

Authors:  D Schultheiss; M R Meschi; J Hagemann; M C Truss; C G Stief; U Jonas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes.

Authors:  John Mulhall; Matthew Anderson; Marilyn Parker
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: a review of 132 patients.

Authors:  Shahram S Gholami; Tom F Lue
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature.

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Reza Sarhangnejad; Seyyed Mohammad Ghahestani; Mohammad Hadi Radfar
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.510

7.  Polytetrafluoroethylene versus polypropylene sutures for Essed-Schroeder tunical plication.

Authors:  Christoph van der Horst; Francisco J Martínez Portillo; Diethild Melchior; Stefan Bross; Peter Alken; Klaus-Peter Juenemann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Subjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie's disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  John P Mulhall; Steven D Creech; Stephen A Boorjian; Sam Ghaly; Edward D Kim; Ayham Moty; Rodney Davis; Wayne Hellstrom
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Surgery for Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Stephen M Larsen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Tunical plication in the management of penile curvature due La Peyronie's disease. Our experience on 47 cases.

Authors:  Fabrizio Iacono; Domenico Prezioso; Antonio Ruffo; Ester Illiano; Giuseppe Romeo; Bruno Amato
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary Review of Peyronie's Disease Treatment.

Authors:  Edward Capoccia; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Preventing the need for revision surgery after penile plication reconstruction of Peyronie's deformities.

Authors:  Rohit S Reddy; Yooni A Yi; Jorge Fuentes; Rachel L Bergeson; Michael T Davenport; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.