| Literature DB >> 28835669 |
Atchara Paemanee1,2, Wannapa Sornjai1, Suthathip Kittisenachai2, Naraporn Sirinonthanawech1, Sittiruk Roytrakul2, Jeerang Wongtrakul3, Duncan R Smith4.
Abstract
Nevirapine (NVP) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor frequently used in combination with other antiretroviral agents for highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However NVP can cause serious, life-threatening complications. Hepatotoxicity is one of the most severe adverse effects, particularly in HIV patients with chronic hepatitis C virus co-infection as these patients can develop liver toxicity after a relatively short course of treatment. However, the mechanism of NVP-associated hepatotoxicity remains unclear. This study sought to investigate the effect of NVP on protein expression in liver cells using a proteomic approach. HepG2 cells were treated or not treated with NVP and proteins were subsequently resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A total of 33 differentially regulated proteins were identified, of which nearly 40% (13/33) were mitochondrial proteins. While no obvious differences were observed between NVP treated and untreated cells after staining mitochondria with mitotracker, RT-PCR expression analysis of three mitochondrially encoded genes showed all were significantly up-regulated in NVP treated cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction was observed in response to treatment even with slightly sub-optimal therapeutic treatment concentrations of NVP. This study shows that NVP induces mitochondrial dysregulation in HepG2 cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28835669 PMCID: PMC5569014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09321-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Analysis of proteins differentially expressed between control and NVP treated HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were treated with either 819 μM NVP or 0.3% DMSO for 7 days before lysates were prepared and proteins subjected to 2D-PAGE analysis. Experiment was undertaken independently in triplicate and representative examples are shown. Selected spots are highlighted and numbering of spots corresponds to Table.
Proteins with altered expression in HepG2 cells after Nevirapine treatment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 385 | gi|66346721 (PCK1) | Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) | 128 | 71451 | Down/12.24 |
| 136 | gi|809185 (ANXA5) | Annexin AV | 302 | 35840 | Up/2.07 |
| 208 | gi|2809324 (CALU) | Calumenin | 200 | 37164 | Up/2.29 |
| 133 | gi|4588526 (CLIC1) | Chloride intracellular channel protein 1 | 215 | 27249 | Down/10.9 |
| 379 | gi|31645 (GAPDH) | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 660 | 36201 | Down/2.19 |
| 143 | gi|704416 (TUFM) | Elongation factor Tu, mitochondrial | 522 | 49852 | Down/2.10 |
| 1 | gi|32189394 (ATP5B) | ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial | 848 | 56525 | Up/2.00 |
| 166 | gi|21040386 (HSPA9) | Stress-70 protein, mitochondrial | 493 | 73920 | Down/1.52 |
| 390 | gi|119600342 (ALDOA) | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A | 111 | 39851 | Down/15.12 |
| 434 | gi|42476281 (VDAC) | Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein | 527 | 32060 | Down/11.97 |
| 43 | gi|5803013 (ERP29) | Endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 29 | 202 | 29032 | Up/3.12 |
| 217 | gi|7305503 (STOML2) | Stomatin-like protein 2, mitochondrial | 376 | 38624 | Up/1.74 |
| 392 | gi|4505763 (PGK1) | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | 125 | 44985 | Down/4.63 |
| 302 | gi|4758484 (GSTO1) | Glutathione S-transferase omega-1 | 280 | 27833 | Up/3.54 |
| 33 | gi|62203298 (IDH1) | Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] cytoplasmic | 479 | 46915 | Up/2.60 |
| 412 | gi|119611102 (OLFML2B) | Olfactomedin-like protein 2B | 19 | 77239 | Down/ND |
| 404 | gi|4557237 (ACAT1) | Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial | 26 | 45456 | Down/ND |
| 406 | gi|19880695 (ACTRT1) | Actin-related protein T1 | 21 | 42258 | Down/ND |
| 428 | gi|4504713 (INSM1) | Insulinoma-associated protein 1 | 24 | 53916 | Down/ND |
| 418 | gi|4557888 (KRT18) | Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 18 | 94 | 48029 | Down/ND |
| 315 | gi|20150581 (TDP1) | Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 | 39 | 52298 | Down/ND |
| 399 | gi|119631909 (NEB) | Nebulin | 33 | 780576 | Down/ND |
| 410 | gi|119606009 (HS3ST6) | Heparan sulfate (glucosamine) 3-O-sulfotransferase 6 | 37 | 56731 | Down/ND |
| 397 | gi|4758988 (RAB15) | Ras-related protein Rab-15 | 75 | 24660 | Down/ND |
| 424 | gi|4757810 (ATP5A1) | ATP synthase subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 465 | 59828 | Down/ND |
| 401 | gi|595266 (HADHA) | Trifunctional enzyme subunit alpha, mitochondrial | 221 | 83688 | Down/ND |
| 383 | gi|21618652 (ABAT) | 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial | 135 | 57087 | Down/ND |
| 111 | gi|31815 (GLUD1) | Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial | 56 | 61701 | Down/ND |
| 400 | gi|37267 (TKT) | Transketolase | 194 | 68519 | Down/ND |
| 407 | gi|50592988 (UQCRC2) | Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2, mitochondrial | 98 | 48584 | Down/ND |
| 387 | gi|4505621 (PEBP1) | Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 | 125 | 21158 | Down/ND |
| 395 | gi|5453543 (AKR1C1) | Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1 | 228 | 37221 | Down/ND |
| 430 | gi|4505591 (PRDX1) | Peroxiredoxin-1 | 148 | 22324 | Down/ND |
ND: Not determined.
Figure 2Western blot analysis of selected proteins. HepG2 cells were not treated (mock), treated with 0.3% DMSO or treated with NVP at concentrations ranging from 3.37 μM to 819 μM. On day 7 of treatment cells lysates were prepared which were subjected to SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis to detect the expression of actin, voltage dependent anion channel (VDAC), Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX1), Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] cytoplasmic (IDH1), ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial (ATP5B) and vinculin. The experiment was undertaken independently in triplicate. Protein band intensities were quantitated using the imageJ image analysis program and analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5 program and the expression all proteins was normalized to vinculin. Error bars show S.E.M.
Figure 3Analysis of proteins differentially expressed in NVP treated HepG2 cells. STRING analysis of proteins differentially expressed in response to NVP treatment. Not all proteins identified were mapped as some Uniprot identifiers were not recognized by SwissProt.
Figure 4NVP treatment induced changes in mitochondria. HepG2 cells were treated with either 819 μM NVP (gray bars) or 0.3% DMSO (white bars) for 7 days (A,B) or 4 and 7 days (C,D) after which cells were (A) stained or not stained with mitotracker (red) and stained with DAPI (blue) and examined by confocal microscopy at x63 times magnification. Representative merged images are shown. (B) The mitotracker red signal was normalized against DAPI for 11 (mitotracker red treated) or 3 (no mitotracker red staining) fields and relative intensity plotted. Error bars represent S.E.M. (*p value < 0.05). (C) The relative mitochondrial genome number was assessed by qPCR. Mitochondrial CYTB gene (mtDNA) was normalized against nuclear FPN1A gene (nDNA). (D) The expression of ATP6, ATP8, CYTB and β-tubulin was assessed by RT-qPCR. The relative mitochondrial RNA expression level was normalized against control. Error bars represent SD (***p value < 0.001).
Figure 5Low concentration NVP treatment induced changes in mitochondria. HepG2 cells were treated with either 10 μM NVP (gray bars) or 0.0037% DMSO (white bars) for 1, 2 or 3 weeks after which cells were (A) examined for the expression of ATP6, ATP8, CYTB and β-tubulin by RT-qPCR with the expression of the mitochondrial RNA being normalized against β-tubulin and the relative expression level was calculated using 2−∆∆CT method, and (B) the relative mitochondrial genome number was assessed by qPCR with the mitochondrial CYTB gene (mtDNA) being normalized against nuclear FPN1A gene (nDNA). Error bars represent SD (*p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01 and ***p value < 0.001).
Figure 6Low concentration NVP treatment induced changes in mitochondria as assessed by mitotracker staining. HepG2 cells were treated with either 10 μM NVP (gray bars) or 0.0037% DMSO (white bars) for 1, 2 or 3 weeks after which cells were (A) stained or not stained with mitotracker (red) and stained with DAPI (blue) and examined by confocal microscopy at x63 times magnification. Representative merged images are shown. (B) The mitotracker red signal was normalized against DAPI for 25 (mitotracker red treated) or 10 (no mitotracker red staining) fields and relative intensity plotted. Error bars represent S.E.M. (**p value < 0.01).