| Literature DB >> 28835644 |
Abel Barral1, Bernard Gomez2, François Fourel2, Véronique Daviero-Gomez2, Christophe Lécuyer2,3.
Abstract
CO2 is considered the main greenhouse gas involved in the current global warming and the primary driver of temperature throughout Earth's history. However, the soundness of this relationship across time scales and during different climate states of the Earth remains uncertain. Here we explore how CO2 and temperature are related in the framework of a Greenhouse climate state of the Earth. We reconstruct the long-term evolution of atmospheric CO2 concentration (pCO2) throughout the Cretaceous from the carbon isotope compositions of the fossil conifer Frenelopsis. We show that pCO2 was in the range of ca. 150-650 ppm during the Barremian-Santonian interval, far less than what is usually considered for the mid Cretaceous. Comparison with available temperature records suggest that although CO2 may have been a main driver of temperature and primary production at kyr or smaller scales, it was a long-term consequence of the climate-biological system, being decoupled or even showing inverse trends with temperature, at Myr scales. Our analysis indicates that the relationship between CO2 and temperature is time scale-dependent at least during Greenhouse climate states of the Earth and that primary productivity is a key factor to consider in both past and future analyses of the climate system.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28835644 PMCID: PMC5569102 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08234-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparison of the carbon isotope compositions of leaves of the fossil conifer Frenelopsis (δ13Cleaf) obtained for each studied episode with the evolution of the carbon isotope composition of atmospheric CO2 (δ13CCO2) throughout the Cretaceous estimated by Barral et al.[16]. Envelopes and bar errors correspond to ±1σ.
δ13Cleaf, δ13CCO2, Δ13Cleaf and pCO2 values for the twelve studied Cretaceous stages. μ and σ correspond to mean and standard deviation, respectively.
|
| Age | δ13Cleaf (‰) | δ13CCO2 (‰) | Δ13Cleaf (‰) |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μ | σ | n | μ | σ | μ | σ | μ | σ | ||
| Hautrage | upper lower Barremian–lower upper Barremian | −27.7 | 0.9 | 30 | −6.1 | 0.5 | 22.3 | 1.1 | 476.5 | 135.2 |
| Uña | upper Barremian | −27.6 | 0.9 | 30 | −5.7 | 0.7 | 22.5 | 1.1 | 502.2 | 155.1 |
| Mas de la Parreta | uppermost Barremian–lower Aptian | −23.0 | 0.9 | 30 | −5.8 | 0.7 | 17.6 | 1.1 | 191.6 | 37.6 |
| El Soplao | lower Albian | −23.1 | 0.9 | 30 | −5.0 | 0.3 | 18.6 | 1.0 | 225.6 | 39.4 |
| San Just | lower–middle Albian | −24.9 | 0.8 | 30 | −5.8 | 0.5 | 19.6 | 1.0 | 272.3 | 53.8 |
| Reillo | upper Albian | −26.8 | 1.0 | 30 | −5.8 | 0.3 | 21.6 | 1.1 | 408.9 | 99.0 |
| Archingeay (A1sl–A) | uppermost Albian | −24.7 | 1.0 | 26 | −5.7 | 0.4 | 19.5 | 1.1 | 265.8 | 53.3 |
| Archingeay (A2sm1–2) | lowermost Cenomanian | −24.4 | 0.9 | 30 | −5.9 | 0.4 | 18.9 | 1.0 | 240.9 | 43.9 |
| La Buzinie | uppermost lower–lowermost middle Cenomanian | −23.1 | 0.9 | 30 | −5.9 | 0.5 | 17.6 | 1.0 | 190.5 | 34.5 |
| Infiesto | upper Turonian–Coniacian | −22.1 | 0.8 | 30 | −5.1 | 0.4 | 17.4 | 0.9 | 185.0 | 30.1 |
| Piolenc | lower Santonian | −26.2 | 1.6 | 17 | −5.2 | 0.6 | 21.5 | 1.7 | 432.5 | 220.3 |
| Belcodème | upper Santonian | −23.4 | 0.6 | 30 | −4.8 | 0.5 | 19.1 | 0.8 | 246.0 | 34.5 |
Figure 2Comparison of the δ13Cleaf-based pCO2 estimates with most recent proxy-based and model-based pCO2 reconstructions for the Cretaceous[3, 7–10]. Envelopes and bar errors represent ±1σ. GCSM: GEOCARBSULF Model reconstructions; PB: Paleosol Barometer reconstructions; SI: Stomatal Index reconstructions.
Figure 3Reconstructed pCO2 compared with available sea surface temperature (SST) records[11–13] for the Cretaceous. Vertical grey bars represent major Oceanic Anoxic Events (OAE) occurring during the Cretaceous[18]. Envelopes represent ±1σ.