Literature DB >> 2883551

Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations.

S E Robbins, A M Hanna.   

Abstract

A number of reports indicate an extremely low running-related injury frequency in barefoot populations in contrast to reports about shod populations. It is hypothesized that the adaptations which produce shock absorption, an inherent consequence of barefoot activity and a mechanism responsible for the low injury frequency in unshod populations, are related to deflection of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot on loading. It is also hypothesized that the known inability of this arch of the shod foot to deflect without failure (foot rigidity) is responsible for the high injury frequency in shod populations. To evaluate these hypotheses, 17 recreational runners were analyzed to study the adaptive pattern of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot due to increased barefoot weight-bearing activity. Changes occurred in the medial longitudinal arch which allowed deflection of this arch on loading which substantiated the hypotheses. Other evidence suggests that sensory feedback largely from the glabrous epithelium of the foot is the element of barefoot activity which induced these adaptations. The sensory insulation inherent in the modern running shoe appears responsible for the high injury frequency associated with running. The injuries are considered "pseudo-neuropathic" in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2883551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  33 in total

1.  A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Factors related to the incidence of running injuries. A review.

Authors:  J H Hoeberigs
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces.

Authors:  S Miller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Effects of Combined Foot/Ankle Electromyostimulation and Resistance Training on the In-Shoe Plantar Pressure Patterns during Sprint in Young Athletes.

Authors:  François Fourchet; Sami Kuitunen; Olivier Girard; Adam J Beard; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics.

Authors:  Mark Bishop; Paul Fiolkowski; Bryan Conrad; Denis Brunt; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Athletic footwear and chronic overloading. A brief review.

Authors:  S E Robbins; G J Gouw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Factors associated with ankle injuries. Preventive measures.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Hazard of deceptive advertising of athletic footwear.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  A comparison of lower limb EMG and ground reaction forces between barefoot and shod gait in participants with diabetic neuropathic and healthy controls.

Authors:  Isabel C N Sacco; Paula M H Akashi; Ewald M Hennig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.