Literature DB >> 28834656

Pharmacological inhibition of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 limits reperfusion injury in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Jérémie Lemarié1,2, Amir Boufenzer1, Batric Popovic1,3, Nguyen Tran4, Frederique Groubatch4, Marc Derive5, Pierre Labroca6, Damien Barraud2, Sébastien Gibot1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Limitation of ischemia/reperfusion injury is a major therapeutic target after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Toll-like receptors are implicated in the inflammatory response that occurs during reperfusion. The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)-1 acts as an amplifier of the immune response triggered by toll-like receptor engagement. We hypothesized that administration of a TREM-1 inhibitory peptide (LR12) could limit reperfusion injury in a porcine model of AMI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: AMI was induced in 15 adult minipigs by a closed-chest coronary artery occlusion-reperfusion technique. Animals were randomized to receive LR12 or vehicle before reperfusion (LR12 n = 7, vehicle n = 8), and were monitored during 18 h. AMI altered hemodynamics and cardiac function, as illustrated by a drop of mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, cardiac power index, ejection fraction, and real-time pressure-volume loop-derived parameters. TREM-1 inhibition by LR12 significantly improved these dysfunctions (P < 0.03) and limited infarct size, as assessed by lower creatine phosphokinase and troponin I concentrations (P < 0.005). Pulmonary, renal, and hepatic impairments occurred after AMI and were attenuated by LR12 administration as assessed by a better PaO2 to FiO2 ratio, a less positive fluid balance, and lower liver enzymes levels (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Inhibition of the TREM-1 pathway by a synthetic peptide limited myocardial reperfusion injury in a clinically relevant porcine model of AMI.
© 2015 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune system; Inflammation; Myocardial infarction; Reperfusion

Year:  2015        PMID: 28834656      PMCID: PMC6410538          DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ESC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2055-5822


Introduction

Over the last 30 years, timely reperfusion strategies have dramatically improved survival rates in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction (AMI).1 Despite this impressive success, mortality and onset of heart failure in survivors remain worrying. Novel therapeutic strategies are definitely needed to further improve myocardial salvage, as infarct size is closely linked to prognosis. Although reperfusion strategies are the cornerstone of myocardial salvage at the acute phase of AMI, they can worsen myocardial injury by themselves. This ‘double‐edge sword’ is termed ‘myocardial reperfusion injury’ phenomenon (RI). Indeed, RI could be responsible for up to half the final infarct size and could therefore be targeted to limit myocardial damage.2 Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) are highly conserved throughout species and act as sensors of danger signals. They recognize exogenous—pathogen‐associated molecular patterns—or endogenous—damage‐associated molecular patterns—molecules and induce innate immune response. During myocardial reperfusion, necrotic cells and damaged extracellular matrix components produce large amounts of damage‐associated molecular patterns, which, in turn, activate TLR signalling. It then promotes a pro‐inflammatory environment, especially through the activation of nuclear factor kappa B pathway, which has repeatedly been implicated in innate immunity activation and generation of lethal RI after cardiac ischemia.3, 4 As TLRs are implicated at the earliest stages of the inflammatory chain reaction, they appear ideal therapeutic targets for limitation of RI.5 Among TLRs present in the heart, TLR‐2 and TLR‐4 have the highest expression levels and have been extensively investigated in the context of RI.6 TREM‐1 is an immune receptor expressed by neutrophils, macrophages, and mature monocytes. It acts as an amplifier of the innate immune response triggered by TLRs engagement.7 It had regularly been shown that blockade of TREM‐1 activation protected from hyper‐responsiveness and death in various models of severe infection.8, 9, 10, 11 Beyond infectious diseases, TREM‐1 has also been found important during aseptic inflammatory disorders.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 The role of the immune system after cardiac ischemia is ambivalent as, on one hand, it appears crucial for debridement of the infarcted myocardium, but on the other hand, it leads to increased infarct size and detrimental ventricular remodelling. Considering this, a fine tuning of the immune response is required. Indeed, attempts to completely inhibit inflammation have failed to improve outcome.17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 Of note, TREM‐1 inhibition does not abrogate immune response but limits its self‐amplification and could therefore allow for a fine tuning between required and deleterious inflammatory signals. We thus investigated LR12, an inhibitory TREM‐1 peptide that acts as a decoy receptor and binds to the yet unknown TREM‐1 ligand,11 during cardiac ischemia in a clinically relevant model of reperfused MI in adult minipigs. We show that LR12 improves hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function and limits remote organ dysfunction.

Methods

The experiments were performed in adherence with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines on the Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the ‘Comité d'éthique en expérimentation animale no. 66’ (Animal Experiments Ethical Committee no. 66) under the agreement number 00492.02. Our protocol was adapted from previously published ones.23, 24

Animal preparation

Adult male minipigs (Sus scrofa domestic, Vietnamese pot‐bellied minipigs, 40–68 kg) were purchased from Elevage Ferry (Vosges, France). Before surgery, animals were acclimated to the animal department for at least 5 days and fasted overnight with free access to water. Pre‐anaesthesia was performed through intramuscular injection of ketamine (10 mg/kg). Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with intravenously administered pentobarbital (initial bolus: 10 mg/kg, continuous infusion 10–12 mg/kg/h during the preparation period and 6–8 mg/kg/h after coronary occlusion), intermittent sufentanyl (10 µg every 2 h), and cisatracurium (Nimbex, GlaxoSmithKline, Marly‐le‐Roi, France) if necessary. Animals were mechanically ventilated (tidal volume 7 mL/kg, positive end‐expiratory pressure 4 cm H2O, FiO2 0.3, respiratory rate 16–18 breaths/min adjusted to maintain normocapnia). Right jugular vein was exposed, and a multi‐lumen central line was inserted for perfusion and Swan–Ganz catheter insertion, allowing for the continuous recording of cardiac output, SvO2, and right atrial and pulmonary arterial pressures (14 Fr multi‐lumen access combining a 8 Fr sheath introducer and 2 conventional central lines, MAC, Teleflex Medical SAS, Le Faget, France). A 5 Fr introducer was placed in the right carotid artery, and a combined pressure‐conductance catheter (Ventri‐Cath 507, Millar Inc, Houston, Texas, USA) was positioned within the left ventricle (LV) under X‐ray guidance for cardiac function assessment. A right femoral arterial 7 Fr introducer was inserted for coronary catheter access and continuous measurement of arterial pressure. Right femoral vein was also catheterized (12 Fr introducer), and an 8–14 Fr Fogarty catheter (Edwards Lifesciences, Nyon, Switzerland) was placed for transient vena cava occlusion. A catheter in the bladder allowed urine collection. The animals received 2500 IU heparin, repeated every 4 h to avoid blood clotting of catheters, and 5 mg/kg amiodarone (Sanofi‐Aventis, Paris, France) 1 h before coronary occlusion to limit cardiac arrhythmias. After surgery, animals were allowed to recover for 2 h before baseline measurements (defined as ‘H0’). Balanced saline solution (Isofundine, B Braun Medical SAS, Boulogne‐Billancourt, France) was continuously administered (10 mL/kg/h) throughout the study. Body temperature was kept constant (±1°C) using cold accumulators.

Experimental protocol

The timeline is presented in Figure 1. After baseline data collection (H0), myocardial infarction was induced by inflation of an angioplasty balloon in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD). An angiogram was performed after inflation of the balloon in order to verify the complete occlusion of LAD. Four animals died from refractory ventricular tachycardia within 15 min after LAD occlusion and were therefore excluded from further analyses. After 45 min, animals were randomized to receive LR12 (LR12 group, n = 7) or the vehicle (phosphate‐buffered saline) alone (control group, n = 8). LR12 consists of a 12 amino acid part of the extracellular domain of TLT‐1 (LQEEDAGEYGCM) and was chemically synthesized (Pepscan Presto BV, Lelystad, The Netherlands) as COOH terminally amidated peptide. The correct compound, free of endotoxin, was obtained with greater than 99% yield and was homogeneous after preparative purification, as confirmed by mass spectrometry and analytic reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography. This lyophilized peptide was extemporaneously solubilized in sterile phosphate‐buffered saline under aseptic conditions. A bolus of 5 mg/kg (in 150 mL) was intravenously delivered over 15 min, then a 1 mg/kg/h (30 mL/h) continuous infusion was started and lasted throughout the study period. This dosage was derived from previous experiments performed in minipigs and corresponded to the best effective dose.10 Control animals received the same amount of vehicle (sterile phosphate‐buffered saline). After a LAD occlusion period of 60 min, the balloon was deflated. An angiogram was performed in order to verify the restoration of the blood flow in the previously occluded artery. Sedation and mechanical ventilation were maintained throughout the 18 h study period.
Figure 1

Experimental timeline. LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; PBS, phosphate‐buffered saline; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; MPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; EDV, end‐diastolic volume; ESV, end‐systolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; dP/dtmax, pressure development during isovolumic contraction; dP/dtmin, pressure development during isovolumic relaxation; VCO, vena cava occlusion; ESPVR and EDPVR, end‐systolic and end‐diastolic pressure volume relationship; Emax, maximal ventricular elastance; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CK, creatine phosphokinase.

Experimental timeline. LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; PBS, phosphate‐buffered saline; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SvO2, mixed venous oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; MPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; EDV, end‐diastolic volume; ESV, end‐systolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; dP/dtmax, pressure development during isovolumic contraction; dP/dtmin, pressure development during isovolumic relaxation; VCO, vena cava occlusion; ESPVR and EDPVR, end‐systolic and end‐diastolic pressure volume relationship; Emax, maximal ventricular elastance; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CK, creatine phosphokinase. Experienced intensive care physicians, blinded for the given treatment, provided animal care. The main hemodynamic targets were to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 85 mmHg, cardiac index above 2.0 L/min/m2, and SvO2 above 60%. To achieve these goals, rapid fluid loading (Isofundine, B Braun Medical SAS, Boulogne‐Billancourt, France) was allowed provided that right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained lower than 18 mmHg. In case of incomplete hemodynamic improvement, a continuous infusion of norepinephrine and/or dobutamine was started. Animals were then killed under deep anaesthesia by KCl infusion 18 h after the induction of myocardial infarction.

Measurements

Hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored throughout the study period and recorded at baseline, every 15 min from H0 to H1.5 and every 2 h from H2 to H18. The recorded parameters included MAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac output, cardiac index, and SvO2. Systemic oxygen delivery (DO2) and systemic oxygen uptake (VO2), and pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance index were calculated by the Swan–Ganz monitor (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). Cardiac Power Index (W/m2) was calculated as MAP*cardiac index/451.25 Pressure–volume (PV) catheter was calibrated before data recordings. The arbitrary relative volume unit number was converted to true volume using pre‐warmed Rho calibration cuvette device (reference 910‐1060, Millar Inc, Houston, Texas, USA) to determine resistivity of body‐temperature heparinized blood. Parallel conductance (i.e. non‐LV blood conductance) was estimated by injection of 2.5 mL NaCl 10% into the pulmonary arterial line with simultaneous LV PV sampling. Pressure sensor was electronically calibrated with MPVSUltra Control Interface Software, according to manufacturer's recommendations. PV catheter‐based parameters were recorded every 2 h from H0 to H18. The ventilator was disconnected for 10 s, and steady state parameters were collected, including dP/dtmax, dP/dtmin (maximum and minimum values of the first derivative of ventricular pressure), end‐diastolic, and end‐systolic volumes of the left ventricle (EDV, ESV), ejection fraction, Tau (time constant of LV pressure decay by Glantz method), and stroke work (SW, i.e. the work performed by the left ventricle to eject the stroke volume into the aorta, calculated as the area within the PV loop). Immediately after, the Fogarty catheter was inflated in the inferior vena cava and pre‐load‐alternating PV data were collected during this vena cava occlusion run, including end‐systolic and end‐diastolic pressure volume relationships (ESPVR and EDPVR), maximum ventricular elastance (Emax), arterial elastance, ‘dP/dtmax to EDV’ relationship, pre‐load recruitable stroke work (PRSW), and pressure–volume area. ESPVR, dP/dtmax to EDV relationship, and PRSW are indexes of myocardial contractility that are relatively insensitive to pre‐load and afterload. Pressure–volume area is the specific area in the pressure–volume plane bounded by the ESPVR and EDPVR lines and the systolic segment of the PV loop. It is linearly correlated to left ventricular oxygen consumption. Blood was sequentially drawn (H0, H2, H6, H12, and H18) for the determination of blood gases, arterial lactates, plasma concentration of alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and creatine phosphokinase. Troponin I was determined by enzyme‐linked immuno assay according to manufacturer's instructions (porcine cardiac troponin I enzyme‐linked immuno assay kit, MBS024086, MyBioSource Inc, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

After testing for their normal distribution (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test), data are presented as means ± SD. Between group differences were tested by two‐way analysis of variance for repeated measures with Bonferroni correction or Student's t‐test when appropriate. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

LR12 improves hemodynamic parameters

After an immediate similar drop following LAD occlusion, MAP progressively increased until the reperfusion where it decreased again (Figure 2). By H6, MAP stabilized to baseline levels in the LR12 animals whereas it further decreased in the control group (94.9% vs. 71.3% of baseline value in LR12 vs. controls at the end of the study, P < 0.01). Two animals in each group required norepinephrine to reach hemodynamic targets, with a significantly lower cumulated dose in LR12 group (0.11 ± 0.07 vs. 2.85 ± 1.57 mg/kg, P < 0.01).
Figure 2

LR12 improves hemodynamics. Evolution of mean arterial pressure (A), heart rate (B), cardiac index (C), and SvO2 (D) during the study period. Hemodynamics parameters were improved in LR12‐treated animals as compared with control ones.

LR12 improves hemodynamics. Evolution of mean arterial pressure (A), heart rate (B), cardiac index (C), and SvO2 (D) during the study period. Hemodynamics parameters were improved in LR12‐treated animals as compared with control ones. Heart rate progressively increased throughout the study in control pigs, whereas it remained stable in LR12 group (P < 0.0001). Myocardial ischemia induced a rapid decline of cardiac index (83.1 and 79.6% of baseline value at H1 in LR12 and controls, respectively) that did not change significantly thereafter. Cardiac index was higher in LR12 than in control animals by H18 (78.9% vs. 65.9% of baseline, P < 0.01). This translated into lower SvO2 at H18 in the control group (P = 0.03). Two and three animals in, respectively, LR12 and control groups required dobutamine infusion to maintain adequate circulatory conditions, with similar cumulative dose (1.18 ± 0.33 vs. 0.93 ± 0.45 µg/kg in controls and LR12, respectively, P = 0.76).

LR12 improves cardiac function and limits infarct size

Cardiac power index, believed to better describe cardiac performance than conventional hemodynamic parameters, was significantly more depressed in controls than in LR12 pigs by H18 (47.2 ± 16.0% vs. 69.3 ± 11.5% of baseline value, P = 0.02) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

LR12 improves cardiac function. Evolution of cardiac power index (A) left ventricular ejection fraction (B), stroke volume (C), stroke work (D), preload recruitable stroke work (E), and pressure‐volume area (F) during the study period. Cardiac dysfunction was attenuated by LR12 treatment.

LR12 improves cardiac function. Evolution of cardiac power index (A) left ventricular ejection fraction (B), stroke volume (C), stroke work (D), preload recruitable stroke work (E), and pressure‐volume area (F) during the study period. Cardiac dysfunction was attenuated by LR12 treatment. Pressure–volume loops studies at steady state revealed significantly lower stroke volumes (P = 0.002) and left ventricle ejection fraction in control group as compared with LR12‐treated pigs (P = 0.01). During vena cava occlusion, we noted an important decrease of PRSW in control group, corrected by LR12 administration (P < 0.001) (Figure 3). The detailed overview of the parameters obtained through PV loops studies is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Selected pressure‐volume loops derived parameters at baseline, 2 hours, and 18 hours after reperfusion

H0H2H18
Emax (mmHg/mL)Controls7.2 ± 3.06.7 ± 4.16.8 ± 3.2
LR127.1 ± 2.15.8 ± 1.06.6 ± 2.8
ESPVR (mmHg/mL)Controls4.3 ± 2.73.6 ± 1.84.3 ± 0.9
LR123.8 ± 1.93.1 ± 1.03.9 ± 1.2
PRSW (mmHg/mL)Controls99.1 ± 16.0 68.0 ± 16.9 * 49.8 ± 21.9 *, **
LR1284.8 ± 14.766.1 ± 27.184.8 ± 20.6
EDPVR (mmHg/mL)Controls0.46 ± 0.390.61 ± 0.360.30 ± 0.06
LR120.36 ± 0.200.48 ± 0.240.33 ± 0.07
Dp/dtmax (mmHg/s)Controls2332 ± 6522333 ± 4681941 ± 402
LR122286 ± 4842008 ± 3862553 ± 837
Dp/dtmin (mmHg/s)Controls−3207 ± 549−2548 ± 4601767 ± 402 *
LR12−3389 ± 1186−2077 ± 715−2314 ± 499
EDV (mL)Controls64.9 ± 17.780.6 ± 14.9 101.3 ± 41.8 *
LR1266.8 ± 23.063.4 ± 17.184.0 ± 14.7
ESV (mL)Controls28.6 ± 11.454.5 ± 26.2 67.2 ± 49.2 *
LR1228.4 ± 15.634.5 ± 19.241.4 ± 23.3
LVEF (%)Controls60.6 ± 14.842.1 ± 14.7 32.0 ± 16.0 *, **
LR1264.1 ± 8.550.0 ± 12.451.5 ± 10.6
EDP (mmHg)Controls16.5 ± 10.529.9 ± 13.919.9 ± 9.6
LR1221.3 ± 6.024.0 ± 6.023.2 ± 9.5
ESP (mmHg)Controls151.4 ± 24.7133.8 ± 19.6124.2 ± 22.2
LR12154.0 ± 22.0124.2 ± 27.3145.9 ± 22.7
Tau (ms)Controls16.4 ± 2.717.4 ± 7.521.8 ± 7.0
LR1216.0 ± 4.823.5 ± 11.221.8 ± 5.6
SW (mL mmHg)Controls4695 ± 16473663 ± 1285 2312 ± 862 *
LR125236 ± 15022890 ± 12783905 ± 1885
Ea (mmHg/mL)Controls4.5 ± 2.03.9 ± 0.75.5 ± 2.3
LR123.8 ± 1.34.3 ± 1.74.3 ± 1.8
PVA (mmHg/mL)Controls11042 ± 65827270 ± 3340 3619 ± 1694 *, **
LR129552 ± 34246749 ± 36136879 ± 2082
dP/dtmax‐EDV relationshipControls13.5 ± 5.324.1 ± 23.230.9 ± 13.7
LR1214.9 ± 20.224.4 ± 15.940.2 ± 36.5
SVRi (dyn s/cm5/m2)Controls2539 ± 4473074 ± 7792831 ± 614
LR122453 ± 5263015 ± 11703125 ± 1023
PVRi (dyn s/cm5/m2)Controls199 ± 105246 ± 70 400 ± 220 *, **
LR12174 ± 29248 ± 56220 ± 61

Emax, maximal ventricular elastance; ESPVR and EDPVR, end‐systolic and end‐diastolic pressure volume relationship; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; dP/dtmax, maximum pressure development during isovolumic contraction; dP/dtmin, minimum pressure development during isovolumic relaxation; EDV, end‐diastolic volume; ESV, end‐systolic volume; EDP, end‐diastolic pressure; ESP, end‐systolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; Tau (time constant of LV pressure decay by non‐zero asymptote method); SW, stroke work; Ea, effective arterial élastance; PVA, pressure‐volume area; SVRi and PVRi, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index (measured by pulmonary artery catheter).

P < 0.05 vs. H0.

P < 0.05 LR12 vs. controls.

Selected pressure‐volume loops derived parameters at baseline, 2 hours, and 18 hours after reperfusion Emax, maximal ventricular elastance; ESPVR and EDPVR, end‐systolic and end‐diastolic pressure volume relationship; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work; dP/dtmax, maximum pressure development during isovolumic contraction; dP/dtmin, minimum pressure development during isovolumic relaxation; EDV, end‐diastolic volume; ESV, end‐systolic volume; EDP, end‐diastolic pressure; ESP, end‐systolic pressure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; Tau (time constant of LV pressure decay by non‐zero asymptote method); SW, stroke work; Ea, effective arterial élastance; PVA, pressure‐volume area; SVRi and PVRi, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index (measured by pulmonary artery catheter). P < 0.05 vs. H0. P < 0.05 LR12 vs. controls. Infarct size estimated by the area under the curve of plasma levels of creatine phosphokinase and troponin I was significantly reduced by LR12 (P < 0.005) (Figures 4 a and 4 b).
Figure 4

LR12 improves remote organ dysfunction and limit infarct size. Evolution of creatine phosphokinase (A), and troponin I plasma concentration (B), fluid balance (C), and PaO2 to FiO2 ratio (D) during the study period. Myocardial infarction was associated with impaired renal function, outlined by highly positive fluid balance, and altered gas exchange. These dysfunctions were corrected by LR12 administration. Moreover, LR12 limited infarct size, as assessed by lower creatine phosphokinase and troponin I levels throughout the study period.

LR12 improves remote organ dysfunction and limit infarct size. Evolution of creatine phosphokinase (A), and troponin I plasma concentration (B), fluid balance (C), and PaO2 to FiO2 ratio (D) during the study period. Myocardial infarction was associated with impaired renal function, outlined by highly positive fluid balance, and altered gas exchange. These dysfunctions were corrected by LR12 administration. Moreover, LR12 limited infarct size, as assessed by lower creatine phosphokinase and troponin I levels throughout the study period.

LR12 reduces organ dysfunction

One hour after myocardial reperfusion, a drop of PaO2/FIO2 was observed in both groups. This phenomenon quickly reversed upon LR12 treatment while persisted throughout the study period in control animals (Figure 4 c). We also observed renal function impairment: fluid balance was more positive in control pigs (P = 0.02) (Figure 4 d), and blood urea nitrogen progressively increased in controls and was higher than in the LR12 animals at the end of the study (Table 2).
Table 2

Biological parameters

H0 H2 H18
BUN (g/L)Controls0.16 ± 0.070.15 ± 0.070.22 ± 0.07*, **
LR120.15 ± 0.030.12 ± 0.030.18 ± 0.06
Creatinine (mg/L)Controls7.03 ± 1.607.82 ± 1.307.37 ± 1.78
LR126.94 ± 1.085.57 ± 1.126.42 ± 0.92
ALT (IU/L)Controls41 ± 2496 ± 34* 102 ± 44*, **
LR1244 ± 2481 ± 4165 ± 5
Platelets Count (G/L)Controls330 ± 160310 ± 160200 ± 130*
LR12360 ± 70330 ± 70240 ± 60*
WBC (per μL)Controls15640 ± 502617225 ± 420223671 ± 12676*
LR1215786 ± 225120367 ± 508621383 ± 4672*
CPK (IU/L)Controls2175 ± 107616552 ± 85344770 ± 1980*, **
LR121390 ± 7829586 ± 67842620 ± 1845
Troponin (ng/mL)Controls0.46 ± 0.27278.80 ± 261.70* 178.50 ± 149.30*
LR120.35 ± 0.25179.70 ± 138.80*, ** 87.70 ± 39.80*, **

BUN refers to blood urea nitrogen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; WBC, white blood cells count; CPK, creatine phosphokinase.

P < 0.05 vs. H0.

P < 0.05 LR12 vs. controls.

Biological parameters BUN refers to blood urea nitrogen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; WBC, white blood cells count; CPK, creatine phosphokinase. P < 0.05 vs. H0. P < 0.05 LR12 vs. controls. Elevation of liver enzymes was observed as soon as 2 h after MI in the control pigs, whereas hepatic cytolysis did not occur upon LR12 treatment (Table 2).

Discussion

Failure of anti‐inflammatory therapies

Similarities exist between septic states and AMI, as innate immune response is quickly initiated by tissue injury, whether related to pathogens or other sterile aggressions such as ischemia. Attempts to inhibit inflammation in the setting of septic shock or AMI have failed to improve patients' outcome. Numerous clinical trials have investigated anti‐inflammatory strategies during these two acute pathological conditions, with sometimes the same evaluated drugs such as high‐dose corticosteroids17, 26 or interleukine‐1β receptor antagonist.27, 28 Despite encouraging pre‐clinical data, translation in the clinic has always been disappointing: failure of anti‐inflammatory approaches has been reviewed elsewhere, either during AMI29 or septic shock.30 However, experts in the field of cardiovascular diseases or sepsis still agree that targeting the inflammatory response could improve outcome but it would require (1) a paradigm shift taking into account the need for an adjusted balance between essential and detrimental facets of inflammation and (2) a more realistic and clinically relevant experimental approach.3, 31 TREM‐1 acts as an amplifier of the innate immune response. Its inhibition does not completely abrogate the inflammatory response but rather attenuates it.7 Conclusive data have been obtained by our group from several experimental animal models of septic shock, including clinically relevant species (i.e. pigs and non‐human primates).10, 32 These results fit with the new paradigm of limiting the magnitude of the initial inflammatory response rather than totally inhibiting it during septic shock.33 These features could also fit with the unmet need for therapies that allow a fine balance between required and deleterious immune response during AMI.

Hypothetical mechanisms

Inflammatory signals in the ischemic myocardium recruit neutrophils within the first hours, with a peak at 24 h, whereas monocytes infiltrate it later.34 Considering the length of our study period, neutrophils are most likely to be involved than other innate immune cells. A bulk of evidence has raised the role of neutrophil‐dependent myocardial injury during reperfusion through distinct mechanisms that could involve TREM‐1.35 First, the no reflow phenomenon has been linked to neutrophils entrapment into the microvasculature. Indeed, before infiltrating the myocardium, leucocytes interact closely with endothelial cells through complex molecular events involving integrins. This step enables leucocytes to roll along the vascular wall and then to stop, a pre‐requisite to transmigration. Recently, the critical role of TREM‐1 in transmigration has been shown in a different model of tissue injury (i.e. bacterial pneumonia) and could therefore explain some of the observed beneficial effects. In addition to microvascular obstruction, neutrophils can directly injure surrounding cardiomyocytes through the release of toxic product such as reactive oxygen species.36 Moreover, activation of the TLR‐4 pathway on circulating leucocytes, which is amplified by TREM‐1 signalling, results in decreased cardiomyocytes contractility.37 Reactive oxygen species release is a critical mediator of myocardial RI. Recruited leucocytes have the potential to produce large amounts of reactive oxygen species and therefore contribute to tissue damage within the first hours. 38 TREM‐1 inhibition reduces reactive oxygen species release in various inflammatory conditions and could thus limit RI through this mechanism.

Strengths

This work has several important strengths. First, we used adult minipigs. Although much more expensive than usual domestic pigs, these animals are physiologically close to adult humans and are well accepted by the scientific community for preclinical cardiovascular research. Second, we used a clinically relevant low‐invasive closed‐chest AMI model, and we tried to mimic what could be the use of this therapy if administered to humans (administration just before reperfusion). Third, we designed this study as a randomized and blinded one, therefore limiting experimental biases. Fourth, experienced intensive care physicians conducted resuscitation throughout the study period.

Limits

Nevertheless, several controversial points deserve discussion. Despite several consistent data sets obtained by different devices and techniques showing a beneficial effect of LR12 treatment, we could not find any significant change of ESPVR, whether between‐group or within‐group. This could be explained by an offset of the volume intercept V0 throughout the study period, a phenomenon previously reported in a similar model evaluating PV loop‐derived parameters during cardiogenic shock in pigs. 23 In the same way, we could not find any difference in dP/dtmax to EDV relationship, another load‐independent contractility index. This parameter has also been previously reported less reliable than PRSW.39 In our study, some issues could explain this result: an offset of volume intercept or a significant increase in heart rate in control animals. We collected many hemodynamic data, so this study is mostly descriptive. Further investigations are required to evaluate mechanistic insights raised in the previous paragraphs. Finally, the length of the study period was short in comparison with the whole process of leucocytes recruitment. Indeed, ischemic myocardium sequentially recruits various leucocytes subsets in a well‐compartmentalized reaction over the first week. However, whether a late therapeutic window to limit RI exists is not known and the current paradigm suggests that cardiomyocytes death mostly occurs quickly after blood flow restoration.2

Conclusion

The inhibition of the TREM‐1 pathway by the synthetic peptide LR12 was able to limit RI in a clinically relevant model of AMI. Although further studies are needed to decipher the precise mechanism of action of this treatment, this new promising strategy could be investigated in humans in the future.

Funding

This work was supported by the School of Surgery (Faculté de Médecine de Nancy, Université de Lorraine) and by INSERM UMR_S1116.

Conflict of interest

Marc Derive and Sébastien Gibot are co‐founders of INOTREM, a company developing TREM‐1 inhibitors
  39 in total

1.  Deleterious effects of methylprednisolone in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Roberts; V DeMello; B E Sobel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  TREM-1 amplifies inflammation and is a crucial mediator of septic shock.

Authors:  A Bouchon; F Facchetti; M A Weigand; M Colonna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The role of neutrophils in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  J E Jordan; Z Q Zhao; J Vinten-Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Double-blind, randomized trial of an anti-CD18 antibody in conjunction with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction: limitation of myocardial infarction following thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (LIMIT AMI) study.

Authors:  K W Baran; M Nguyen; G R McKendall; C T Lambrew; G Dykstra; S T Palmeri; R J Gibbons; S Borzak; B E Sobel; S G Gourlay; A C Rundle; C M Gibson; H V Barron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The effect of blockade of the CD11/CD18 integrin receptor on infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty: the results of the HALT-MI study.

Authors:  David P Faxon; Raymond J Gibbons; Nicolas A F Chronos; Paul A Gurbel; Florence Sheehan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Immune cell Toll-like receptor 4 is required for cardiac myocyte impairment during endotoxemia.

Authors:  Samantha A Tavener; Elizabeth M Long; Stephen M Robbins; Krista M McRae; Holly Van Remmen; Paul Kubes
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry.

Authors:  Rupert Fincke; Judith S Hochman; April M Lowe; Venu Menon; James N Slater; John G Webb; Thierry H LeJemtel; Gad Cotter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Pexelizumab, an anti-C5 complement antibody, as adjunctive therapy to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the COMplement inhibition in Myocardial infarction treated with Angioplasty (COMMA) trial.

Authors:  Christopher B Granger; Kenneth W Mahaffey; W Douglas Weaver; Pierre Theroux; Judith S Hochman; Thomas G Filloon; Scott Rollins; Thomas G Todaro; Jose C Nicolau; Witold Ruzyllo; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Effect of pexelizumab, an anti-C5 complement antibody, as adjunctive therapy to fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: the COMPlement inhibition in myocardial infarction treated with thromboLYtics (COMPLY) trial.

Authors:  Kenneth W Mahaffey; Christopher B Granger; Jose C Nicolau; Witold Ruzyllo; W Douglas Weaver; Pierre Theroux; Judith S Hochman; Thomas G Filloon; Christopher F Mojcik; Thomas G Todaro; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  A soluble form of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 modulates the inflammatory response in murine sepsis.

Authors:  Sébastien Gibot; Marie-Nathalie Kolopp-Sarda; Marie-C Béné; Pierre-Edouard Bollaert; Alain Lozniewski; Françoise Mory; Bruno Levy; Gilbert C Faure
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  7 in total

1.  A first-in-man safety and pharmacokinetics study of nangibotide, a new modulator of innate immune response through TREM-1 receptor inhibition.

Authors:  Valerie Cuvier; Ulrike Lorch; Stephan Witte; Aurelie Olivier; Sebastien Gibot; Isabelle Delor; Jean-Jacques Garaud; Marc Derive; Margarita Salcedo-Magguilli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The role of endogenous Smad7 in regulating macrophage phenotype following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jun Li; Ruoshui Li; Izabela Tuleta; Silvia C Hernandez; Claudio Humeres; Anis Hanna; Bijun Chen; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 5.834

3.  Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 is a marker of organ injuries in cardiogenic shock: results from the CardShock Study.

Authors:  Antoine Kimmoun; Kevin Duarte; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Tuukka Tarvasmäki; Bruno Levy; Alexandre Mebazaa; Sebastien Gibot
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Novel ligands and modulators of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells receptor family: 2015-2020 updates.

Authors:  Harbinder Singh; Vikrant Rai; Sunil K Nooti; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.714

5.  Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 Inhibitor Targeted to Endothelium Decreases Cell Activation.

Authors:  Sébastien Gibot; Lucie Jolly; Jérémie Lemarié; Kevin Carrasco; Marc Derive; Amir Boufenzer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  TREM-1; Is It a Pivotal Target for Cardiovascular Diseases?

Authors:  Kouassi T Kouassi; Palanikumar Gunasekar; Devendra K Agrawal; Gopal P Jadhav
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2018-09-07

7.  Rationale and protocol for the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nangibotide in patients with septic shock (ASTONISH) phase IIb randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bruno Francois; Simon Lambden; Sebastien Gibot; Marc Derive; Aurelie Olivier; Valerie Cuvier; Stephan Witte; Jean-Marie Grouin; Jean Jacques Garaud; Margarita Salcedo-Magguilli; Mitchell Levy; Pierre-François Laterre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.