BACKGROUND: The study's purpose is to describe the development and evaluate the reliability (inter-observer agreement) and validity (rater agreement with a gold standard) of a direct observation instrument to assess park characteristics that may be related to physical activity. METHODS: A direct observation instrument of 181 items was developed based on a conceptual model consisting of the following domains: features, condition, access, esthetics, and safety. Fifteen pairs of observers were trained and sent to two parks simultaneously to assess two Target Areas each. RESULTS: Overall domain reliability was 86.9%, and overall geographic area reliability was 87.5%. Overall domain validity was 78.7% and overall geographic area validity was 81.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability and validity were generally good, although validity was slightly lower than reliability. Objective items showed the highest reliability and validity. Items that are time-sensitive may need to be measured on multiple occasions, while items asking for subjective responses may require more supervised practice.
BACKGROUND: The study's purpose is to describe the development and evaluate the reliability (inter-observer agreement) and validity (rater agreement with a gold standard) of a direct observation instrument to assess park characteristics that may be related to physical activity. METHODS: A direct observation instrument of 181 items was developed based on a conceptual model consisting of the following domains: features, condition, access, esthetics, and safety. Fifteen pairs of observers were trained and sent to two parks simultaneously to assess two Target Areas each. RESULTS: Overall domain reliability was 86.9%, and overall geographic area reliability was 87.5%. Overall domain validity was 78.7% and overall geographic area validity was 81.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater reliability and validity were generally good, although validity was slightly lower than reliability. Objective items showed the highest reliability and validity. Items that are time-sensitive may need to be measured on multiple occasions, while items asking for subjective responses may require more supervised practice.
Authors: Elizabeth L Oliphant; S Morgan Hughey; Ellen W Stowe; Andrew T Kaczynski; Jasper Schipperijn; J Aaron Hipp Journal: J Park Recreat Admi Date: 2019-02-08
Authors: Catalina Medina; Annel Hernández; Maria E Hermosillo-Gallardo; Célida I Gómez Gámez; Eugen Resendiz; Maricruz Morales; Claudia Nieto; Mildred Moreno; Simón Barquera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Gavin R Jenkins; Hon K Yuen; Emily J Rose; Amy I Maher; Kristina C Gregory; Megan E Cotton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katie M Heinrich; Christopher K Haddock; Natinee Jitnarin; Joseph Hughey; LaVerne A Berkel; Walker S C Poston Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Madeleine E Bird; Geetanjali D Datta; Andraea van Hulst; Yan Kestens; Tracie A Barnett Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Megan Knapp; Jeanette Gustat; Revonda Darensbourg; Leann Myers; Carolyn Johnson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390