Dan R Berlowitz1, Capri G Foy1, Lewis E Kazis1, Linda P Bolin1, Molly B Conroy1, Peter Fitzpatrick1, Tanya R Gure1, Paul L Kimmel1, Kent Kirchner1, Donald E Morisky1, Jill Newman1, Christine Olney1, Suzanne Oparil1, Nicholas M Pajewski1, James Powell1, Thomas Ramsey1, Debra L Simmons1, Joni Snyder1, Mark A Supiano1, Daniel E Weiner1, Jeff Whittle1. 1. From the Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Bedford (D.R.B., L.E.K.), and Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health (D.R.B., L.E.K.) and Tufts Medical Center (D.E.W.), Boston - all in Massachusetts; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem (C.G.F., J.N., N.M.P.), and East Carolina University College of Nursing (L.P.B.) and Brody School of Medicine (J.P.), East Carolina University, Greenville - both in North Carolina; the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (M.B.C.); Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville (P.F.); the Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (T.R.G.); the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P.L.K.) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (J.S.), Bethesda, MD; the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Jackson, MS (K.K.); UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles (D.E.M.); Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis (C.O.); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (S.O., T.R.); University of Utah School of Medicine (D.L.S., M.A.S.) and VA Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (M.A.S.), Salt Lake City; and the Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee (J.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient-reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood-pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient-reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pressure medications, and adherence to blood-pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive-treatment group with those in the standard-treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS: Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ-9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow-up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood-pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062 .).
BACKGROUND: The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient-reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood-pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient-reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pressure medications, and adherence to blood-pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive-treatment group with those in the standard-treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS: Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ-9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow-up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood-pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062 .).
Authors: Nicholas M Pajewski; Jeff D Williamson; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Linda P Bolin; Glenn M Chertow; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Nieves Lopez-Barrera; James R Powell; Christianne L Roumie; Carolyn Still; Kaycee M Sink; Rocky Tang; Clinton B Wright; Mark A Supiano Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Dan Berlowitz; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Steven M Wright; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Graeme Fincke; Xinhua S Ren; Austin Lee; William H Rogers; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Mark Linzer; Lewis E Kazis Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2004 Jul-Sep
Authors: Justine E F Moonen; Jessica C Foster-Dingley; Wouter de Ruijter; Jeroen van der Grond; Anne Suzanne Bertens; Mark A van Buchem; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Huub A Middelkoop; Marieke J H Wermer; Rudi G J Westendorp; Anton J M de Craen; Roos C van der Mast Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Adam P Bress; Rikki M Tanner; Rachel Hess; Lisandro D Colantonio; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Suzanne Oparil; Maria Czarina Acelajado; George L Bakris; Dan R Berlowitz; Renata Cífková; Anna F Dominiczak; Guido Grassi; Jens Jordan; Neil R Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Paul K Whelton Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 52.329