Literature DB >> 28834436

Landscape Scale Study of the Net Effect of Proximity to a Neonicotinoid-Treated Crop on Bee Colony Health.

Nicholas J Balfour1, Hasan Al Toufailia1, Luciano Scandian1, Héloïse E Blanchard1,2, Matthew P Jesse1, Norman L Carreck1, Francis L W Ratnieks1.   

Abstract

Since 2013, the European Commission has restricted the use of three neonicotinoid insecticides as seed dressings on bee-attractive crops. Such crops represent an important source of forage for bees, which is often scarce in agro-ecosystems. However, this benefit has often been overlooked in the design of previous field studies, leaving the net impact of neonicotinoid treated crops on bees relatively unknown. Here, we determine the combined benefit (forage) and cost (insecticide) of oilseed rape grown from thiamethoxam-treated seeds on Bombus terrestris and Apis mellifera colonies. In April 2014, 36 colonies per species were located adjacent to three large oilseed rape fields (12 colonies per field). Another 36 were in three nearby locations in the same agro-ecosystem, but several kilometers distant from any oilseed rape fields. We found that Bombus colony growth and reproduction were unaffected by location (distant versus adjacent) following the two month flowering period. Apis colony and queen survival were unaffected. However, there was a small, but significant, negative relationship between honey and pollen neonicotinoid contamination and Apis colony weight gain. We hypothesize that any sublethal effects of neonicotinoid seed dressings on Bombus colonies are potentially offset by the additional foraging resources provided. A better understanding of the ecological and agronomic factors underlying neonicotinoid residues is needed to inform evidence-based policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28834436     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Gut microbiota composition is associated with environmental landscape in honey bees.

Authors:  Julia C Jones; Carmelo Fruciano; Falk Hildebrand; Hasan Al Toufalilia; Nicholas J Balfour; Peer Bork; Philipp Engel; Francis Lw Ratnieks; William Oh Hughes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Neonicotinoid residues in UK honey despite European Union moratorium.

Authors:  Ben A Woodcock; Lucy Ridding; Stephen N Freeman; M Gloria Pereira; Darren Sleep; John Redhead; David Aston; Norman L Carreck; Richard F Shore; James M Bullock; Matthew S Heard; Richard F Pywell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Honey bee colony-level exposure and effects in realistic landscapes: An application of BEEHAVE simulating clothianidin residues in corn pollen.

Authors:  Amelie Schmolke; Farah Abi-Akar; Silvia Hinarejos
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Evaluating imidacloprid exposure among grape field male workers using biological and environmental assessment tools: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Nicolás López-Gálvez; Rietta Wagoner; Robert A Canales; Jill de Zapien; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; Cecilia Rosales; Paloma Beamer
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 5.840

5.  Uptake and toxicity of clothianidin to monarch butterflies from milkweed consumption.

Authors:  Timothy A Bargar; Michelle L Hladik; Jaret C Daniels
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.