Tzu-Chieh Lin1, Kazuki Yoshida2, Sara K Tedeschi1, Mirhelen Mendes de Abreu3, Nikroo Hashemi1, Daniel H Solomon1. 1. Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation rates in patients with resolved or chronic HBV infection, receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and with or without antiviral prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Embase using Ovid through December 31, 2015. A search strategy was developed for each database using the following inclusion criteria: for participants, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and resolved or chronic HBV infection; for intervention, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors or non-TNF biologic or nonbiologic DMARDs; and for outcome, HBV reactivation. Four reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To determine the pooled HBV reactivation rate, the variances of the raw proportions were stabilized using a Freeman-Tukey-type arcsine square root transformation, using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled rate of HBV reactivation was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.8-2.6) in patients with resolved HBV. Similar rates were observed in resolved patients taking TNF inhibitors (1.4% [95% CI 0.5-2.6]), non-TNF biologics (6.1% [95% CI 0.0-16.6]), and nonbiologic DMARDs (1.7% [95% CI 0.2-4.2]). We also found that the reactivation rate was lower in patients with chronic HBV infection who received antiviral prophylaxis (9.0% [95% CI 4.1-15.5]) than in those who did not (14.6% [95% CI 4.3-29.0]). CONCLUSION: We found that the HBV reactivation rate in inflammatory arthritis patients receiving DMARDs was low in resolved patients and moderate in patients with chronic HBV infection. Further, lower rates were observed in patients with chronic HBV infection who were using antiviral prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation rates in patients with resolved or chronic HBV infection, receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and with or without antiviral prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Embase using Ovid through December 31, 2015. A search strategy was developed for each database using the following inclusion criteria: for participants, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and resolved or chronic HBV infection; for intervention, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors or non-TNF biologic or nonbiologic DMARDs; and for outcome, HBV reactivation. Four reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To determine the pooled HBV reactivation rate, the variances of the raw proportions were stabilized using a Freeman-Tukey-type arcsine square root transformation, using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled rate of HBV reactivation was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.8-2.6) in patients with resolved HBV. Similar rates were observed in resolved patients taking TNF inhibitors (1.4% [95% CI 0.5-2.6]), non-TNF biologics (6.1% [95% CI 0.0-16.6]), and nonbiologic DMARDs (1.7% [95% CI 0.2-4.2]). We also found that the reactivation rate was lower in patients with chronic HBV infection who received antiviral prophylaxis (9.0% [95% CI 4.1-15.5]) than in those who did not (14.6% [95% CI 4.3-29.0]). CONCLUSION: We found that the HBV reactivation rate in inflammatory arthritispatients receiving DMARDs was low in resolved patients and moderate in patients with chronic HBV infection. Further, lower rates were observed in patients with chronic HBV infection who were using antiviral prophylaxis.
Authors: Caterina Palleria; Luigi Iannone; Christian Leporini; Rita Citraro; Antonia Manti; Maurizio Caminiti; Pietro Gigliotti; Rosa Daniela Grembiale; Massimo L'Andolina; Giuseppe Muccari; Maria Diana Naturale; Domenico Olivo; Giuseppa Pagano Mariano; Roberta Pellegrini; Giuseppe Varcasia; Karim Abdalla; Emilio Russo; Francesco Ursini; Giovambattista De Sarro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Patterson; Gabriela Schmajuk; Michael Evans; Ishita Aggarwal; Zara Izadi; Milena Gianfrancesco; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2019-01-25
Authors: Andres Laserna; Alejandro Durán-Crane; María A López-Olivo; John A Cuenca; Cosmo Fowler; Diana Paola Díaz; Yenny R Cardenas; Catherine Urso; Keara O'Connell; Clara Fowler; Kristen J Price; Charles L Sprung; Joseph L Nates Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 17.440