Literature DB >> 28834221

Tolerance after liver transplantation: Where are we?

Sandy Feng1, John Bucuvalas2.   

Abstract

Impeccable management of immunosuppression is required to ensure the best longterm outcomes for liver transplant recipients. This is particularly challenging for children who arguably need 8 decades of graft and patient survival. Too little risks chronic, often subclinical allo-immune injury while too much risks insidious and cumulative toxicities. Historically, immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal has been a strategy to optimize the longevity of liver transplant recipients. The literature is sprinkled with single-center reports of operationally tolerant patients - those with apparently normal liver function and liver tests. However, without biopsy evidence of immunological quiescence, confidence in the phenotypic assignment of tolerance is shaky. More recently, multicenter trials of immunosuppression withdrawal for highly selected, stable, longterm adult and pediatric liver recipients have shown tolerance rates, based on both biochemical and histological assessment, of 40% and 60%, respectively. Extended biochemical and histologic follow-up of children over 8 years, equivalent to 7+ years off of drug, suggests that operational tolerance is robust. Therefore, clearly, immunosuppression can be completely and safety withdrawn from highly-selected subsets of adults and children. However, these trials have also confirmed that clinically ideal recipients - those eligible for immunosuppression withdrawal trial - can harbor significant and worrisome inflammation and/or fibrosis. Although the etiology and prognosis of these findings remain unknown, it is reasonable to surmise that they may reflect an anti-donor immune response that is insufficiently controlled. To achieve the outcomes that we are seeking and that our patients are demanding, we desperately need noninvasive but accurate biomarkers that identify whether immunosuppression is neither too much nor too little but "just right." Until these are available, liver histology remains the gold standard to assess allograft health and guide immunosuppression management. Liver Transplantation 23 1601-1614 2017 AASLD.
© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28834221     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  17 in total

1.  Predicting ideal outcome after pediatric liver transplantation: An exploratory study using machine learning analyses to leverage Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Data.

Authors:  Sharad Indur Wadhwani; Evelyn K Hsu; Michele L Shaffer; Ravinder Anand; Vicky Lee Ng; John C Bucuvalas
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-07-22

Review 2.  Tolerance in the Age of Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Bluestone; Mark Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Evidence of Chronic Allograft Injury in Liver Biopsies From Long-term Pediatric Recipients of Liver Transplants.

Authors:  Sandy Feng; John C Bucuvalas; Anthony J Demetris; Bryna E Burrell; Katherine M Spain; Sai Kanaparthi; John C Magee; David Ikle; Andrew Lesniak; Juan J Lozano; Estella M Alonso; Robert A Bray; Nancy E Bridges; Edward Doo; Howard M Gebel; Nitika A Gupta; Ryan W Himes; Annette M Jackson; Steven J Lobritto; George V Mazariegos; Vicky L Ng; Elizabeth B Rand; Averell H Sherker; Shikha Sundaram; Yumirle P Turmelle; Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Ex vivo generation of regulatory T cells from liver transplant recipients using costimulation blockade.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Shimozawa; Laura Contreras-Ruiz; Sofia Sousa; Ruan Zhang; Urvashi Bhatia; Kerry C Crisalli; Lisa L Brennan; Laurence A Turka; James F Markmann; Eva C Guinan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 9.369

Review 5.  The Role of Diverse Liver Cells in Liver Transplantation Tolerance.

Authors:  Yanzhi Jiang; Weitao Que; Ping Zhu; Xiao-Kang Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  De novo malignancies after liver transplantation: The effect of immunosuppression-personal data and review of literature.

Authors:  Tommaso Maria Manzia; Roberta Angelico; Carlo Gazia; Ilaria Lenci; Martina Milana; Oludamilola T Ademoyero; Domiziana Pedini; Luca Toti; Marco Spada; Giuseppe Tisone; Leonardo Baiocchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Transplant Tolerance Induction: Insights From the Liver.

Authors:  Helong Dai; Yawen Zheng; Angus W Thomson; Natasha M Rogers
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  The Immunological Basis of Liver Allograft Rejection.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ronca; Grace Wootton; Chiara Milani; Owen Cain
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Isabel Legaz; Francisco Boix; Manuela López; Rafael Alfaro; José A Galián; Santiago Llorente; Jose A Campillo; Carmen Botella; Pablo Ramírez; Francisco Sánchez-Bueno; José A Pons; María R Moya-Quiles; Alfredo Minguela; Manuel Muro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Applicability, safety, and biological activity of regulatory T cell therapy in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Alberto Sánchez-Fueyo; Gavin Whitehouse; Nathali Grageda; Matthew E Cramp; Tiong Y Lim; Marco Romano; Sarah Thirkell; Katie Lowe; Laura Fry; Julie Heward; Alex Kerr; Jakia Ali; Chris Fisher; Gillian Lewis; Andrew Hope; Elisavet Kodela; Mike Lyne; Farzin Farzaneh; Shahram Kordasti; Irene Rebollo-Mesa; Juan Jose Lozano; Niloufar Safinia; Nigel Heaton; Robert Lechler; Marc Martínez-Llordella; Giovanna Lombardi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.