Jitao Wu1,2, Chalairat Suk-Ouichai1,3, Wen Dong1,4, Elvis Caraballo Antonio1, Ithaar H Derweesh5, Brian R Lane6, Sevag Demirjian1, Jianbo Li1,7, Steven C Campbell1. 1. Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China. 3. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 5. Department of Urology, University of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA, USA. 6. Division of Urology, Spectrum Health, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 7. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate predictors of long-term survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily due to surgery (CKD-S). Patients with CKD-S have generally good survival that approximates patients who do not have CKD even after renal cancer surgery (RCS), yet there may be heterogeneity within this cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2008, 4 246 patients underwent RCS at our centre. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 9.4 (7.3-11.0) years. New baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was defined as highest GFR between nadir and 6 weeks after RCS. We retrospectively evaluated three cohorts: no-CKD (new baseline GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); CKD-S (new baseline GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 but preoperative GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); and CKD due to medical aetiologies who then require RCS (CKD-M/S, preoperative and new baseline GFR both <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Analysis focused primarily on non-renal cancer-related survival (NRCRS) for the CKD-S cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed the longitudinal impact of new baseline GFR (45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and Cox regression evaluated relative impact of preoperative GFR, new baseline GFR, and relevant demographics/comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 4 246 patients who underwent RCS, 931 had CKD-S and 1 113 had CKD-M/S, whilst 2 202 had no-CKD even after RCS. Partial/radical nephrectomy (PN/RN) was performed in 54%/46% of the patients, respectively. For CKD-S, 641 patients had a new baseline GFR of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 290 had a new baseline GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly reduced NRCRS for patients with CKD-S with a GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with no-CKD or CKD-S with a GFR of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (both P ≤ 0.004), and competing risk analysis confirmed this (P < 0.001). Age, gender, heart disease, and new baseline GFR were all associated independently with NRCRS for patients with CKD-S (all P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that CKD-S is heterogeneous, and patients with a reduced new baseline GFR have compromised survival, particularly if <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Our findings may have implications regarding choice of PN/RN in patients at risk of developing CKD-S.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate predictors of long-term survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily due to surgery (CKD-S). Patients with CKD-S have generally good survival that approximates patients who do not have CKD even after renal cancer surgery (RCS), yet there may be heterogeneity within this cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2008, 4 246 patients underwent RCS at our centre. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 9.4 (7.3-11.0) years. New baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was defined as highest GFR between nadir and 6 weeks after RCS. We retrospectively evaluated three cohorts: no-CKD (new baseline GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); CKD-S (new baseline GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 but preoperative GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); and CKD due to medical aetiologies who then require RCS (CKD-M/S, preoperative and new baseline GFR both <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Analysis focused primarily on non-renal cancer-related survival (NRCRS) for the CKD-S cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed the longitudinal impact of new baseline GFR (45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and Cox regression evaluated relative impact of preoperative GFR, new baseline GFR, and relevant demographics/comorbidities. RESULTS: Of the 4 246 patients who underwent RCS, 931 had CKD-S and 1 113 had CKD-M/S, whilst 2 202 had no-CKD even after RCS. Partial/radical nephrectomy (PN/RN) was performed in 54%/46% of the patients, respectively. For CKD-S, 641 patients had a new baseline GFR of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 290 had a new baseline GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly reduced NRCRS for patients with CKD-S with a GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with no-CKD or CKD-S with a GFR of 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (both P ≤ 0.004), and competing risk analysis confirmed this (P < 0.001). Age, gender, heart disease, and new baseline GFR were all associated independently with NRCRS for patients with CKD-S (all P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that CKD-S is heterogeneous, and patients with a reduced new baseline GFR have compromised survival, particularly if <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Our findings may have implications regarding choice of PN/RN in patients at risk of developing CKD-S.
Authors: Nityam Rathi; Yosuke Yasuda; Worapat Attawettayanon; Diego A Palacios; Yunlin Ye; Jianbo Li; Christopher Weight; Mohammed Eltemamy; Tarik Benidir; Robert Abouassaly; Steven C Campbell Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2022-07-17 Impact factor: 2.266
Authors: Amit K Patel; Brian R Lane; Prateek Chintalapati; Lina Fouad; Mohit Butaney; Jeffrey Budzyn; Anna Johnson; Ji Qi; Edward Schervish; Craig G Rogers Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2021-06-24