Literature DB >> 28833848

An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.

M Roy1, S Kaushal1, D Jain1, A Seth2, V K Iyer1, S R Mathur1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urine cytology is a highly specific modality for diagnosing high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), but plagued by low sensitivity and wide inter-observer variability mainly ascribed to the lack of an established template of reporting. The Paris System (TPS) working group proposed such a template at the 2013 International Congress of Cytology, replete with objective criteria for categorising specimens into one of the seven categories: non-diagnostic, negative for HGUC, atypical urothelial cells, suspicious for HGUC, HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm and others (including non-malignant entities). This study was undertaken to determine the impact of TPS criteria in the morphological interpretation of urine samples.
METHODS: A total of 255 voided urine specimens from 97 patients who had follow-up biopsies were re-assessed according to TPS criteria and correlated with the final histological diagnosis.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were diagnosed with HGUC, and 34 had low-grade papillary UC on biopsy. Earlier samples from 40 (41.2%) patients were categorised as merely "atypical" wheereas the "positive for malignancy" category was assigned to 33 (34%) patients. After re-evaluation of the same cases using TPS criteria, cytological features in 44 (69.8%) out of 63 HGUC patients were correctly recognised as HGUC and samples from additional seven patients were re-categorised as suspicious for HGUC (total 81%). The sensitivity of the HGUC category in predicting HGUC was 69.8% which rose to 81% when HGUC was grouped with suspicious for HGUC category.
CONCLUSION: The criteria outlined by TPS facilitated the standardisation of urine cytology reporting and significantly increased the sensitivity of diagnosing HGUC.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  The Paris System; atypical cells; high grade urothelial carcinoma; suspicious for HGUC; urine cytology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28833848     DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  5 in total

1.  Fluorescence Emitted by Papanicolaou-Stained Urothelial Cells Improves Sensitivity of Urinary Conventional Cytology for Detection of Urothelial Tumors.

Authors:  Kinan Drak Alsibai; Ghislaine Daste; Sophie Ferlicot; Monique Fabre; Karine Steenkeste; Julia Salleron; Yacine Hammoudi; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart; Pascal Eschwege
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 2.  The Diagnostic Dilemma of Urothelial Tissue Fragments in Urinary Tract Cytology Specimens.

Authors:  Derek B Allison; M Lisa Zhang; Poonam Vohra; Christopher J VandenBussche
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Impact of the Paris system for reporting urine cytopathology on predictive values of the equivocal diagnostic categories and interobserver agreement.

Authors:  Rania Bakkar; James Mirocha; Xuemo Fan; David P Frishberg; Mariza de Peralta-Venturina; Jing Zhai; Shikha Bose
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Comparison of Diagnostic Performances of Urine Cytology Before and After the Use of The Paris System Criteria: An Institutional Experience from Turkey.

Authors:  Sevgen Onder; Olcay Kurtulan; Altan Kavuncuoglu; Bulent Akdogan
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ilias P Nikas; Svenja Seide; Tanja Proctor; Zoi Kleinaki; Maria Kleinaki; Jordan P Reynolds
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.