Literature DB >> 28833716

Genomic estimation of additive and dominance effects and impact of accounting for dominance on accuracy of genomic evaluation in sheep populations.

N Moghaddar1,2, J H J van der Werf1,2.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate the additive and dominance variance component of several weight and ultrasound scanned body composition traits in purebred and combined cross-bred sheep populations based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker genotypes and then to investigate the effect of fitting additive and dominance effects on accuracy of genomic evaluation. Additive and dominance variance components were estimated in a mixed model equation based on "average information restricted maximum likelihood" using additive and dominance (co)variances between animals calculated from 48,599 SNP marker genotypes. Genomic prediction was based on genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and the accuracy of prediction was assessed based on a random 10-fold cross-validation. Across different weight and scanned body composition traits, dominance variance ranged from 0.0% to 7.3% of the phenotypic variance in the purebred population and from 7.1% to 19.2% in the combined cross-bred population. In the combined cross-bred population, the range of dominance variance decreased to 3.1% and 9.9% after accounting for heterosis effects. Accounting for dominance effects significantly improved the likelihood of the fitting model in the combined cross-bred population. This study showed a substantial dominance genetic variance for weight and ultrasound scanned body composition traits particularly in cross-bred population; however, improvement in the accuracy of genomic breeding values was small and statistically not significant. Dominance variance estimates in combined cross-bred population could be overestimated if heterosis is not fitted in the model.
© 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; dominance variance; genomic evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28833716     DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.

Authors:  Fernanda S S Raidan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Yutao Li; Sigrid A Lehnert; Zulma G Vitezica; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Improved genomic prediction of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects.

Authors:  Seema Yadav; Xianming Wei; Priya Joyce; Felicity Atkin; Emily Deomano; Yue Sun; Loan T Nguyen; Elizabeth M Ross; Tony Cavallaro; Karen S Aitken; Ben J Hayes; Kai P Voss-Fels
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.574

3.  Detecting the dominance component of heritability in isolated and outbred human populations.

Authors:  Anthony F Herzig; Teresa Nutile; Daniela Ruggiero; Marina Ciullo; Hervé Perdry; Anne-Louise Leutenegger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.

Authors:  Pascal Duenk; Piter Bijma; Mario P L Calus; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Genomic Prediction of Additive and Dominant Effects on Wool and Blood Traits in Alpine Merino Sheep.

Authors:  Shaohua Zhu; Hongchang Zhao; Mei Han; Chao Yuan; Tingting Guo; Jianbin Liu; Yaojing Yue; Guoyan Qiao; Tianxiang Wang; Fanwen Li; Shuangbao Gun; Bohui Yang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  The Association Between Genomic Heterozygosity and Carcass Merit in Cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Tara R Carthy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Non-additive Effects in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Andres Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Estimating dominance genetic variances for growth traits in American Angus males using genomic models.

Authors:  Carolina A Garcia-Baccino; Daniela A L Lourenco; Stephen Miller; Rodolfo J C Cantet; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar.

Authors:  Marie Pégard; Vincent Segura; Facundo Muñoz; Catherine Bastien; Véronique Jorge; Leopoldo Sanchez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  Sabrina T Amorim; Haipeng Yu; Mehdi Momen; Lúcia Galvão de Albuquerque; Angélica S Cravo Pereira; Fernando Baldi; Gota Morota
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.