OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging to identify idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (IRBD) patients at risk for short-term development of clinically defined synucleinopathy. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with polysomnography-confirmed IRBD underwent 123 I-FP-CIT DAT-SPECT. Results were compared to 20 matched controls without RBD who underwent DAT-SPECT. In patients, FP-CIT uptake was considered abnormal when values were two standard deviations below controls' mean uptake. After DAT-SPECT, patients were followed up during 5.7 ± 2.2 (range, 2.6-9.9) years. RESULTS: Baseline DAT deficit was found in 51 (58.6%) patients. During follow-up, 25 (28.7%) subjects developed clinically defined synucleinopathy (Parkinson's disease in 11, dementia with Lewy bodies in 13, and multiple system atrophy in 1) with mean latency of 3.2 ± 1.9 years from imaging. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed increased risk of incident synucleinopathy in patients with abnormal DAT-SPECT than with normal DAT-SPECT (20% vs 6% at 3 years, 33% vs 18% at 5 years; log rank test, p = 0.006). Receiver operating characteristics curve revealed that reduction of FP-CIT uptake in putamen greater than 25% discriminated patients with DAT deficit who developed synucleinopathy from patients with DAT deficit that remained disease free after 3 years of follow-up. At 5-year follow-up, DAT-SPECT had 75% sensitivity, 51% specificity, 44% positive predictive value, 80% negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio 1.54 to predict synucleinopathy. INTERPRETATION: DAT-SPECT identifies IRBD patients at short-term risk for synucleinopathy. Decreased FP-CIT putamen uptake greater than 25% predicts synucleinopathy after 3 years' follow-up. These observations may be useful to select candidates for disease modification trials in IRBD. Ann Neurol 2017;82:419-428.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging to identify idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (IRBD) patients at risk for short-term development of clinically defined synucleinopathy. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with polysomnography-confirmed IRBD underwent 123 I-FP-CITDAT-SPECT. Results were compared to 20 matched controls without RBD who underwent DAT-SPECT. In patients, FP-CIT uptake was considered abnormal when values were two standard deviations below controls' mean uptake. After DAT-SPECT, patients were followed up during 5.7 ± 2.2 (range, 2.6-9.9) years. RESULTS: Baseline DAT deficit was found in 51 (58.6%) patients. During follow-up, 25 (28.7%) subjects developed clinically defined synucleinopathy (Parkinson's disease in 11, dementia with Lewy bodies in 13, and multiple system atrophy in 1) with mean latency of 3.2 ± 1.9 years from imaging. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed increased risk of incident synucleinopathy in patients with abnormal DAT-SPECT than with normal DAT-SPECT (20% vs 6% at 3 years, 33% vs 18% at 5 years; log rank test, p = 0.006). Receiver operating characteristics curve revealed that reduction of FP-CIT uptake in putamen greater than 25% discriminated patients with DAT deficit who developed synucleinopathy from patients with DAT deficit that remained disease free after 3 years of follow-up. At 5-year follow-up, DAT-SPECT had 75% sensitivity, 51% specificity, 44% positive predictive value, 80% negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio 1.54 to predict synucleinopathy. INTERPRETATION:DAT-SPECT identifies IRBD patients at short-term risk for synucleinopathy. Decreased FP-CIT putamen uptake greater than 25% predicts synucleinopathy after 3 years' follow-up. These observations may be useful to select candidates for disease modification trials in IRBD. Ann Neurol 2017;82:419-428.
Authors: Jan Rémi; Thomas Pollmächer; Kai Spiegelhalder; Claudia Trenkwalder; Peter Young Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Ralph Buchert; Carsten Buhmann; Ivayla Apostolova; Philipp T Meyer; Jürgen Gallinat Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Zeynep Idil Seckin; Jennifer L Whitwell; Rene L Utianski; Hugo Botha; Farwa Ali; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Mary M Machulda; Lennon G Jordan; Hoon-Ki Min; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Yves Dauvilliers; Carlos H Schenck; Ronald B Postuma; Alex Iranzo; Pierre-Herve Luppi; Giuseppe Plazzi; Jacques Montplaisir; Bradley Boeve Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Daniela Berg; Per Borghammer; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Sebastian Heinzel; Jacob Horsager; Eva Schaeffer; Ronald B Postuma Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Mitchell G Miglis; Charles H Adler; Elena Antelmi; Dario Arnaldi; Luca Baldelli; Bradley F Boeve; Matteo Cesari; Irene Dall'Antonia; Nico J Diederich; Kathrin Doppler; Petr Dušek; Raffaele Ferri; Jean-François Gagnon; Ziv Gan-Or; Wiebke Hermann; Birgit Högl; Michele T Hu; Alex Iranzo; Annette Janzen; Anastasia Kuzkina; Jee-Young Lee; Klaus L Leenders; Simon J G Lewis; Claudio Liguori; Jun Liu; Christine Lo; Kaylena A Ehgoetz Martens; Jiri Nepozitek; Giuseppe Plazzi; Federica Provini; Monica Puligheddu; Michal Rolinski; Jan Rusz; Ambra Stefani; Rebekah L S Summers; Dallah Yoo; Jennifer Zitser; Wolfgang H Oertel Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 44.182