Literature DB >> 28833178

Expediting red blood cell transfusions by syringing causes significant hemolysis.

Willem Lambertus De Villiers1, Adriaan Albertus Murray1, Andrew Ian Levin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Techniques commonly used to expedite blood transfusions include pneumatically pressurizing red blood cell (RBC) bags or manual syringing its contents. We compared these techniques on RBC hemolysis using a simulated transfusion model. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifteen warmed RBC units that were 12.3 ± 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.1-14.5) days old were each subjected to two experimental rapid transfusion techniques. RBCs from each technique were directed through 18- and 22-gauge cannulas attached to blood administration sets. One technique involved RBC bag pressurization to 300 mmHg. The other employed a 20-mL syringe to effect forceful, manual aspiration from the RBC bag followed by forceful, manual RBC injection. The control group was gravity driven without cannulas. Free hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were measured and percent hemolysis was calculated.
RESULTS: Free Hb concentrations and percent hemolysis (median [95% CI]) were similar in the control (0.05 [0.03-0.08] g/dL and 0.13% [0.09%-0.17%], respectively) and pressurized experiments (0.06 [0.05-0.09] g/dL; 0.14% [0.12%-0.22%]), respectively. Syringing resulted in 10-fold higher free Hb concentrations (0.55 [0.38-0.92] g/dL) and percent hemolysis (1.28% [1.03%-2.15%]) than when employing the control (p < 0.0001) or pressurization (p < 0.0001) techniques. Cannula sizes studied did not affect hemolysis.
CONCLUSION: Forceful manual syringing caused significant hemolysis and high free Hb concentrations. Pressurizing RBC bags induced no more hemolysis than after gravity-facilitated transfusions. Syringing to expedite RBC transfusions should be avoided in favor of pneumatic RBC bag pressurization.
© 2017 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28833178     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of effectiveness of the piston-pump method versus the pressure-infusor method for rapid infusion of crystalloids: A bench study.

Authors:  Wataru Hashimoto; Ichiro Takenaka; Keisuke Yasunami; Tomoko Minami; Haruhiko Sano
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-12-12

2.  A pressure-resistant peripherally inserted central catheter is as useful as a central venous catheter for rapid fluid infusion: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jun Maki; Makoto Sumie; Tomoko Ide; Masako Nagamatsu; Katsuyuki Matsushita; Kazuhiro Shirozu; Midoriko Higashi; Ken Yamaura
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.376

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.