OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on prescribing practices in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center in St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 75 and older with AF admitted to the hospital from October 2010 through September 2015 (N = 6,568, 50% female, 15% non-white). MEASUREMENTS: Information on NOACs and warfarin prescribed at discharge was obtained from hospital discharge summaries, and linear regression was used to examine quarterly trends in their use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of anticoagulant use. RESULTS: NOAC use increased over time (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.87, P < .001), warfarin use did not change (r = -0.16, P = .50), and overall anticoagulant use (NOACs and warfarin) increased (r = 0.68, P = .001). NOAC use increased over time in all age groups (75-79, 80-84, 85-89) except aged 90 and older, but increasing age attenuated the rate of NOAC uptake. There was no consistent relationship between age and warfarin or overall anticoagulant use, except that individuals aged 90 and older had consistently lower use. Overall, fewer than 45% of participants were prescribed an anticoagulant. In multivariable analysis, younger age, white race, female sex, higher hemoglobin, higher creatinine clearance, being on a medical service, hypertension, stroke or transient ischemic attack, no history of intracranial hemorrhage, and a modified HAS-BLED score of less than 3 increased the likelihood of receiving NOACs. CONCLUSION: Prescription of anticoagulants for AF increased in older adults primarily because of an increase in the use of NOACs. Nonetheless, fewer than 45% of participants were prescribed an anticoagulant. Additional research is needed to optimize prescribing practices for older adults with AF.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on prescribing practices in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center in St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 75 and older with AF admitted to the hospital from October 2010 through September 2015 (N = 6,568, 50% female, 15% non-white). MEASUREMENTS: Information on NOACs and warfarin prescribed at discharge was obtained from hospital discharge summaries, and linear regression was used to examine quarterly trends in their use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of anticoagulant use. RESULTS:NOAC use increased over time (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.87, P < .001), warfarin use did not change (r = -0.16, P = .50), and overall anticoagulant use (NOACs and warfarin) increased (r = 0.68, P = .001). NOAC use increased over time in all age groups (75-79, 80-84, 85-89) except aged 90 and older, but increasing age attenuated the rate of NOAC uptake. There was no consistent relationship between age and warfarin or overall anticoagulant use, except that individuals aged 90 and older had consistently lower use. Overall, fewer than 45% of participants were prescribed an anticoagulant. In multivariable analysis, younger age, white race, female sex, higher hemoglobin, higher creatinine clearance, being on a medical service, hypertension, stroke or transient ischemic attack, no history of intracranial hemorrhage, and a modified HAS-BLED score of less than 3 increased the likelihood of receiving NOACs. CONCLUSION: Prescription of anticoagulants for AF increased in older adults primarily because of an increase in the use of NOACs. Nonetheless, fewer than 45% of participants were prescribed an anticoagulant. Additional research is needed to optimize prescribing practices for older adults with AF.
Authors: Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Robby Nieuwlaat; Cees B de Vos; Harry J G M Crijns; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Chest Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Jeffrey I Weitz; William Semchuk; Alexander G G Turpie; William D Fisher; Cindy Kong; Antonio Ciaccia; John A Cairns Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A John Camm; Gabriele Accetta; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Dan Atar; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Eivind Berge; Frank Cools; David A Fitzmaurice; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Shinya Goto; Sylvia Haas; Gloria Kayani; Yukihiro Koretsune; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Frank Misselwitz; Seil Oh; Alexander G G Turpie; Freek W A Verheugt; Ajay K Kakkar Journal: Heart Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Nicole B Sur; Kefeng Wang; Marco R Di Tullio; Carolina M Gutierrez; Chuanhui Dong; Sebastian Koch; Hannah Gardener; Enid J García-Rivera; Juan Carlos Zevallos; W Scott Burgin; David Z Rose; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Jose G Romano; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jose María Mostaza; Manuel Jesús Romero Jiménez; Fernando José Ruiz Laiglesia; José Antonio Díaz Peromingo; Manuel Beltrán Robles; Ernesto Guevara Sierra; Ana Santander Bilbao; Carmen Suárez Journal: J Geriatr Cardiol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Bory Kea; Bethany T Waites; Amber Lin; Merritt Raitt; David R Vinson; Niroj Ari; Luke Welle; Andrew Sill; Dana Button; Benjamin C Sun Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-29
Authors: Michael Eichinger; Henry Douglas Pow Robb; Cosmo Scurr; Harriet Tucker; Stefan Heschl; George Peck Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 2.953