Monika Mitra1, Ilhom Akobirshoev1, Nechama Sammet Moring1, Linda Long-Bellil2, Suzanne C Smeltzer3, Lauren D Smith1, Lisa I Iezzoni4. 1. 1 The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University , Waltham, Massachusetts. 2. 2 Center for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Shrewsbury, Massachusetts. 3. 3 Center for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing , Villanova, Pennsylvania. 4. 4 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, The Mongan Institute for Health Policy , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous qualitative studies suggest that women with physical disabilities face disability-specific barriers and challenges related to prenatal care accessibility and quality. This study aims to examine the pregnancy and prenatal care experiences and needs of U.S. mothers with physical disabilities and their perceptions of their interactions with their maternity care clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the first survey of maternity care access and experiences of women with physical disabilities from 37 states. The survey was disseminated in partnership with disability community agencies and via social media and targeted U.S. women with a range of physical disabilities who had given birth in the past 10 years. The survey included questions regarding prenatal care quality and childbirth and labor experiences. RESULTS: A total of 126 women with various physical disability types from 37 states completed the survey. Almost half of the respondents (53.2%) reported that their physical disability was a big factor in their selection of a maternity care provider and 40.3% of women reported that their prenatal care provider knew little or nothing about the impact of their physical disability on their pregnancy. Controlling for maternal demographic characteristics and use of mobility equipment, women who reported that their prenatal care provider lacked knowledge of disability and those who felt they were not given adequate information were more likely to report unmet needs for prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest the need for training and education for clinicians regarding the prenatal care needs of women with physical disabilities.
BACKGROUND: Previous qualitative studies suggest that women with physical disabilities face disability-specific barriers and challenges related to prenatal care accessibility and quality. This study aims to examine the pregnancy and prenatal care experiences and needs of U.S. mothers with physical disabilities and their perceptions of their interactions with their maternity care clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the first survey of maternity care access and experiences of women with physical disabilities from 37 states. The survey was disseminated in partnership with disability community agencies and via social media and targeted U.S. women with a range of physical disabilities who had given birth in the past 10 years. The survey included questions regarding prenatal care quality and childbirth and labor experiences. RESULTS: A total of 126 women with various physical disability types from 37 states completed the survey. Almost half of the respondents (53.2%) reported that their physical disability was a big factor in their selection of a maternity care provider and 40.3% of women reported that their prenatal care provider knew little or nothing about the impact of their physical disability on their pregnancy. Controlling for maternal demographic characteristics and use of mobility equipment, women who reported that their prenatal care provider lacked knowledge of disability and those who felt they were not given adequate information were more likely to report unmet needs for prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest the need for training and education for clinicians regarding the prenatal care needs of women with physical disabilities.
Entities:
Keywords:
disability; prenatal care; reproductive health
Authors: Monika Mitra; Karen M Clements; Jianying Zhang; Lisa I Iezzoni; Suzanne C Smeltzer; Linda M Long-Bellil Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Courtney S Streur; Christine L Schafer; Valerie P Garcia; Elisabeth H Quint; David E Sandberg; Claire Z Kalpakjian; Daniela A Wittmann Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Nicole D Agaronnik; Tara Lagu; Elizabeth Pendo; Eric G Campbell Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Nicole D Agaronnik; Karen Donelan; Tara Lagu; Eric G Campbell Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Karen Donelan; Nicole Agaronnik; Tara Lagu; Eric G Campbell Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2021-06-23