Literature DB >> 28832245

Health promotion and sustainability programmes in Australia: barriers and enablers to evaluation.

Rebecca Patrick1, Jonathan Kingsley2.   

Abstract

In an era characterised by the adverse impacts of climate change and environmental degradation, health promotion programmes are beginning to actively link human health with environmental sustainability imperatives. This paper draws on a study of health promotion and sustainability programmes in Australia, providing insights to evaluation approaches being used and barriers and enablers to these evaluations. The study was based on a multi-strategy research involving both quantitative and qualitative methods. Health promotion practitioners explained through surveys and semi-structured interviews that they focused on five overarching health and sustainability programme types (healthy and sustainable food, active transport, energy efficiency, contact with nature, and capacity building). Various evaluation methods and indicators (health, social, environmental, economic and demographic) were identified as being valuable for monitoring and evaluating health and sustainability programmes. Findings identified several evaluation enablers such as successful community engagement, knowledge of health and sustainability issues and programme champions, whereas barriers included resource constraints and competing interests. This paper highlights the need for ecological models and evaluation tools to support the design and monitoring of health promotion and sustainability programmes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecological health promotion; environmental sustainability; evaluation; health promotion; mixed methods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28832245     DOI: 10.1177/1757975917715038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Health Promot        ISSN: 1757-9759


  2 in total

1.  Perceptions of mothers on child well-being, changes in everyday life and social sustainability: lessons learned from a community-based health promotion programme in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Najith Duminda Galmangoda Guruge; Adam Arhelger; Kalpani Abhayasinghe
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.966

2.  Success factors of health promotion: Evaluation by DEMATEL and M-DEMATEL methods - A case study in a non-profit organization.

Authors:  Chi-Horng Liao; Silviu Bercea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.