Literature DB >> 28831573

Native predators living in invaded areas: responses of terrestrial amphibian species to an Argentine ant invasion.

Paloma Alvarez-Blanco1, Stephane Caut2, Xim Cerdá1, Elena Angulo1.   

Abstract

Predator-prey interactions play a key role in the success and impacts of invasive species. However, the effects of invasive preys on native predators have been poorly studied. Here, we first reviewed hypotheses describing potential relationships between native predators and invasive preys. Second, we examined how an invasive prey, the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), affected a native terrestrial amphibian community. In the field, we looked at the structure of the amphibian community in invaded versus uninvaded areas and characterized amphibian trophic ecology. The amphibian community sampled seemed to show a species-dependent response in abundance to invasion: adults of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita), the species demonstrating the highest degree of ant specialization, were less abundant in invaded areas. Although available ant biomass was significantly greater in invaded than in uninvaded areas (only Argentine ants occurred in the former), amphibians consumed relatively fewer ants in invaded areas. In the lab, we quantified amphibian consumption of Argentine ants versus native ants and assessed whether consumption patterns could have been influenced by prior exposure to the invader. The lab experiments corroborated the field results: amphibians preferred native ants over Argentine ants, and prior exposure did not influence consumption. Differences in preference explained why amphibians consumed fewer Argentine ants in spite of their greater relative availability; they might also explain why the most ant-specialized amphibians seemed to avoid invaded areas. Our results suggest the importance to account for predator feeding capacities and dietary ranges to understand the effects of invasive species at higher trophic levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotic resistance; Enemy release; Exotic prey naïveté; Invasive prey; Linepithema humile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28831573     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3929-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Do native predators benefit from non-native prey?

Authors:  Lauren M Pintor; James E Byers
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naiveté.

Authors:  Peter B Banks; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions.

Authors:  Dov F Sax; John J Stachowicz; James H Brown; John F Bruno; Michael N Dawson; Steven D Gaines; Richard K Grosberg; Alan Hastings; Robert D Holt; Margaret M Mayfield; Mary I O'Connor; William R Rice
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence.

Authors:  Alexandra J R Carthey; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-02-07

5.  Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants.

Authors:  A V Suarez; D A Holway; T J Case
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparative analysis of the macronutrient content of Central European ants (Formicidae): implications for ant-eating predators.

Authors:  S Pekár; D Mayntz
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Exploitative strategies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and native ant species in a southern Spanish pine forest.

Authors:  S Carpintero; J Retana; X Cerdá; J Reyes-López; L Arias de Reyna
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.377

8.  Sources of variation in consumer-diet delta 15N enrichment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathew A Vanderklift; Sergine Ponsard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  An exotic species is the favorite prey of a native enemy.

Authors:  Yiming Li; Zunwei Ke; Supen Wang; Geoffrey R Smith; Xuan Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Deadly intentions: naïve introduced foxes show rapid attraction to odour cues of an unfamiliar native prey.

Authors:  Jenna P Bytheway; Catherine J Price; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Novel predators emit novel cues: a mechanism for prey naivety towards alien predators.

Authors:  Alexandra J R Carthey; Martin P Bucknall; Kaja Wierucka; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Intermediate predator naïveté and sex-skewed vulnerability predict the impact of an invasive higher predator.

Authors:  Ross N Cuthbert; Tatenda Dalu; Ryan J Wasserman; Jaimie T A Dick; Lubabalo Mofu; Amanda Callaghan; Olaf L F Weyl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.