| Literature DB >> 28830130 |
Jae Jung Ha1, Ka Young Yang2, Dong Yep Oh1, Jun Koo Yi1, Jong Joo Kim3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to analyze the effects of stocking density on growth and carcass quality, and behavior of Hanwoo cattle to conform with global trends, targeting animal welfare production through the practice of environmentally friendly condition.Entities:
Keywords: Behavior; Carcass Trait; Growth Performance; Hanwoo; Stocking Density
Year: 2017 PMID: 28830130 PMCID: PMC6212748 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Experimental design of different stoking densities.
Composition of nutrients in the experimental feedstuffs for Hanwoo steers
| Nutrients (%) | Concentrate | Rice straw | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Early fattening | Late fattening | ||
| Dry matter | 83.55 | 83.18 | 90.09 |
| Crude protein | 14.19 | 12.31 | 4.53 |
| Crude fat | 3.49 | 4.87 | 2.17 |
| Crude fiber | 4.57 | 4.25 | 27.66 |
| Crude ash | 4.85 | 5.90 | 14.31 |
| Calcium | 0.72 | 0.94 | 0.22 |
| Phosphorous | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.12 |
| Total digestible nutrients | 72.43 | 73.75 | 37.13 |
The amounts of feed intake in the two main fattening phases
| Month | Feed intake (kg/head/d) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Concentrate | Rice straw | ||
| Phase I (Early fattening) | 12 | 5.5 | 3.5 |
| 13 | 6 | 3.5 | |
| 14 | 6 | 3.5 | |
| 15 | 6.5 | 3 | |
| 16 | 7 | 3 | |
| 17 | 7 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7.5 | 2.5 | |
| 19 | 8 | 2.5 | |
| 20 | 8 | 2.5 | |
| 21 | 8.5 | 2 | |
| Phase II (Late fattening) | 22 | 8.5 | 2 |
| 23 | 9 | 2 | |
| 24 | 9 | 1.5 | |
| 25 | 9.5 | 1.5 | |
| 26 | 9.5 | 1.5 | |
| 27 | 10 | 1 | |
| 28 | 10 | 1 | |
| 29 | 10.5 | 1 | |
| 30 | 10 | 0.5 | |
The average amounts of feed intake (kg/head) in different stocking densities in Hanwoo steers
| Feeds | Stocking density group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | |
| Total | 5,386±47 | 5,403±47 | 5,430±47 |
| Concentrate | 4,193±21 | 4,198±21 | 4,212±21 |
| Rice straw | 1,193±14 | 1,205±14 | 1,218±14 |
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Effects of different stocking density on body weight (kg) in Hanwoo steers
| Month | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | |
| 12 | 283.8±16.7 | 292.3±16.0 | 298.3±16.2 |
| 15 | 351.6±13.8 | 362.8±11.5 | 370.7±10.7 |
| 18 | 417.3±11.6 | 412.1±12.3 | 438.4±10.6 |
| 21 | 508.2±13.1 | 519.5±11.2 | 525.3±12.4 |
| 24 | 560.0±20.3 | 575.0±16.8 | 581.3±17.1 |
| 27 | 631.0±18.6 | 639.7±14.0 | 644.3±18.4 |
| 30 | 683.5±21.3 | 680.6±27.0 | 683.7±25.5 |
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Effects of different stocking density on average daily gain (kg/d) in Hanwoo steers
| Month | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | |
| 12–15 | 0.75±0.16 | 0.78±0.03 | 0.76±0.14 |
| 15–18 | 0.73±0.09 | 0.55±0.04 | 0.64±0.07 |
| 18–21 | 1.01±0.19 | 1.19±0.06 | 0.96±0.09 |
| 12–21 | 0.83±0.08 | 0.84±0.09 | 0.84±0.12 |
| 21–24 | 0.58±0.13 | 0.62±0.04 | 0.62±0.03 |
| 24–27 | 0.79±0.14 | 0.72±0.10 | 0.70±0.01 |
| 27–30 | 0.58±0.08 | 0.46±0.21 | 0.44±0.19 |
| 21–30 | 0.65±0.14 | 0.60±0.12 | 0.59±0.11 |
| 12–30 | 0.74±0.08 | 0.72±0.07 | 0.71±0.05 |
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Figure 2Classification of behavior characteristics. (A) Standing (ST), (B) Lying down (LD), (C) Walking (WA), (D) Self grooming (SG), (E) Leaning (LN), (F) Fighting (FT).
Effects of different stocking density on ultrasound and carcass quality traits of Hanwoo steers
| Items | Months | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | ||
| BFTU (mm) | 12 | 1.50±0.93 | 1.13±0.34 | 1.21±0.59 |
| 15 | 1.75±1.16 | 1.25±0.45 | 1.29±0.75 | |
| 18 | 2.63±1.69 | 1.94±0.93 | 2.33±1.27 | |
| 21 | 4.00±2.33 | 3.56±1.15 | 3.92±1.38 | |
| 24 | 4.75±2.60 | 4.56±1.63 | 4.71±1.82 | |
| 27 | 6.25±3.01 | 6.25±2.27 | 6.13±2.02 | |
| BFTC (mm) | 30 | 9.63±3.02 | 9.75±2.72 | 10.26±2.47 |
| LMAU (cm2) | 12 | 42.86±3.61 | 46.03±4.20 | 45.79±3.86 |
| 15 | 48.11±3.77 | 49.92±3.59 | 50.93±4.17 | |
| 18 | 60.16±3.58 | 60.63±3.35 | 62.56±3.40 | |
| 21 | 72.59±3.83 | 71.90±3.54 | 72.86±4.60 | |
| 24 | 77.56±2.68 | 77.83±3.31 | 78.09±4.39 | |
| 27 | 84.00±5.38 | 85.72±4.69 | 85.93±4.35 | |
| LMAC (cm2) | 30 | 91.00±6.68 | 92.81±6.80 | 94.55±6.66 |
| MSU | 12 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 |
| 15 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.00±0.00 | |
| 18 | 1.88±0.99 | 2.06±0.85 | 2.67±1.13 | |
| 21 | 2.63±1.06 | 2.25±1.06 | 2.96±1.40 | |
| 24 | 3.75±1.16 | 4.00±1.26 | 4.42±1.44 | |
| 27 | 5.00±1.98 | 5.38±1.82 | 6.13±1.58 | |
| MSC | 30 | 5.25±1.57 | 6.13±1.35 | 6.63±1.84 |
BFTU, ultrasound back fat thickness; BFTC, carcass back fat thickness; LMAU, ultrasound longissimus muscle area; LMAC, carcass longissimus muscle area; MSU, ultrasound marbling score; MSC, carcass marbling score.
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Effects of different stocking density on carcass weight and dressing percentage in Hanwoo steers
| Items | Treatments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 | |
| Carcass weight (kg/head) | 397.8±11.7 | 423.4±16.9 | 417.0±15.3 |
| Dressing percentage (%/head) | 58.2±1.7 | 62.2±2.6 | 61.0±2.2 |
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).
Effects of different stocking density on behavior characteristics in Hanwoo steers
| Items | Control | Treatment 1 | Treatment 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minute | |||
| Standing | 221.6±25.8 | 209.5±19.4 | 207.1±27.9 |
| Lying down | 119.8±27.8 | 128.3±34.1 | 130.6±20.3 |
| Walking | 14.5±7.7 | 11.6±3.5 | 34.8±17.4 |
| Count | |||
| Self grooming | 24.28±20.44 | 10.30±8.12 | 7.36±11.08 |
| Leaning | 5.41±1.86 | 4.91±0.76 | 4.27±1.13 |
| Fighting | 6.56±2.12 | 4.89±2.71 | 3.24±2.66 |
10 m2/head.
12.5 m2/head.
16.7 m2/head.
Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05).