| Literature DB >> 28829814 |
Juliana da Rosa1, Gabriela Gomes Weber1, Rafaela Cardoso1, Felipe Górski1, Paulo Roberto Da-Silva1.
Abstract
Better knowledge of medicinal plant species and their conservation is an urgent need worldwide. Decision making for conservation strategies can be based on the knowledge of the variability and population genetic structure of the species and on the events that may influence these genetic parameters. Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. is a native plant from the grassy fields of South America with high value in folk medicine. In spite of its importance, no genetic and conservation studies are available for the species. In this work, microsatellite and ISSR (inter-simple sequence repeat) markers were used to estimate the genetic variability and structure of seven populations of A. flaccida from southern Brazil. The microsatellite markers were inefficient in A. flaccida owing to a high number of null alleles. After the evaluation of 42 ISSR primers on one population, 10 were selected for further analysis of seven A. flaccida populations. The results of ISSR showed that the high number of exclusive absence of loci might contribute to the inter-population differentiation. Genetic variability of the species was high (Nei's diversity of 0.23 and Shannon diversity of 0.37). AMOVA indicated higher genetic variability within (64.7%) than among (33.96%) populations, and the variability was unevenly distributed (FST 0.33). Gene flow among populations ranged from 1.68 to 5.2 migrants per generation, with an average of 1.39. The results of PCoA and Bayesian analyses corroborated and indicated that the populations are structured. The observed genetic variability and population structure of A. flaccida are discussed in the context of the vegetation formation history in southern Brazil, as well as the possible anthropogenic effects. Additionally, we discuss the implications of the results in the conservation of the species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28829814 PMCID: PMC5568751 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Data from the populations of Achryrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. sampled from grassy ecosystems of the Atlantic Forest in south Brazil. N: Number of individuals sampled.
| Sampling site/Population name | State | Geographic coordinates | N | Original ecosystem | Actual ecosystem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marialva | PR | 23°24'35.25"S 51°47'42.75'O | 20 | ASF | Agriculture |
| Guarapuava | PR | 25°22'12.81"S 51°30'25.44"O | 20 | Mosaic | Pastures |
| Porto Barreiro | PR | 25°34'31.25"S 52°23'55.20"O | 19 | Mosaic | Agriculture |
| Xanxerê | SC | 26°51'35.77"S 52°21'50.46"O | 16 | Transition | Pastures |
| Campos Novos | SC | 27°20'10.58"S 51°21'08.86"O | 18 | Mosaic | Pastures |
| Coxilha | RS | 28°05'37.18"S 52°16'23.36"O | 18 | Mosaic | Agriculture |
| Panambi | RS | 28°21'11.94"S 53°28'30.99"O | 20 | Mosaic | Agriculture |
1 Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest;
2 Araucaria Forest and grassy ecosystems;
3 Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest and Araucaria Forest.;
4 Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest with enclaves of Araucaria Forest.
The sequences and annealing temperatures (AT, °C) of 15 nuclear microsatellite primer pairs selected for transferability evaluation in Achryrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC.
| Loci | Primers sequence (5’- 3’) | AT °C | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| SS20E | 50°C | [ | |
| SS24F | 59°C | [ | |
| Eari4–5 | 59°C | [ | |
| Eari4–6 | 57°C | [ | |
| 19 | 55°C | [ | |
| CO189 | 60°C | [ | |
| CO227 | 62°C | [ | |
| 23_(TG)3+7st | 58.2°C | [ | |
| Amb82 | 60°C | [ | |
| Sg_2 | 65°C | [ | |
| Sg_6 | 65°C | [ | |
| Sg_8 | 65°C | [ | |
| ER-HAJZC | 63°C | [ | |
| Lho35 | 57°C | [ | |
| Hsalz-12 | 53.9°C | [ | |
(*) PCR Touchdown.
The 42 ISSR primers and their respective attributes in Achryrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC.
AT: annealing temperature; AP: amplification product; NAF: number of amplified fragments, % P: percentage of polymorphism, PIC: polymorphic information content, MI: marker index, RP: resolving power.
| ISSR | AT | AP | NAF | %P | PIC | MI | RP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 12 | 83.33 | 0.37 | 5.71 | 5.40 | ||
| 50 | 11 | 100.0 | 0.38 | 8.30 | 6.12 | ||
| UBC 809 | 55 | 6 | 66.67 | 0.41 | 6.81 | 2.40 | |
| UBC 810 | 52 | 9 | 100.0 | 0.33 | 6.59 | 4.32 | |
| UBC 811 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UBC 813 | 50 | 10 | 60.00 | 0.33 | 4.58 | 2.50 | |
| UBC 814 | 50 | 7 | 85.71 | 0.38 | 7.11 | 3.18 | |
| UBC 815 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UBC 817 | 52 | 13 | 76.92 | 0.29 | 4.25 | 3.40 | |
| UBC 820 | 52 | 12 | 83.33 | 0.30 | 4.76 | 3.90 | |
| UBC 822 | 53 | 5 | 80.00 | 0.35 | 5.81 | 2.00 | |
| UBC 823 | 52 | 21 | 80.95 | 0.30 | 5.04 | 7.00 | |
| UBC 824 | 50 | 7 | 42.86 | 0.31 | 2.74 | 1.22 | |
| UBC 826 | 52 | 8 | 75.00 | 0.33 | 4.92 | 2.74 | |
| 53 | 14 | 78.57 | 0.37 | 6.50 | 6.59 | ||
| UBC 828 | 50 | 3 | 66.67 | 0.34 | 4.52 | 1.16 | |
| 52 | 16 | 93.75 | 0.41 | 8.04 | 9.78 | ||
| 52 | 16 | 93.75 | 0.30 | 5.54 | 5.89 | ||
| UBC 836 | 53 | 13 | 84.62 | 0.30 | 5.05 | 4.53 | |
| UBC 840 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UBC 843 | 54 | 9 | 84.62 | 0.30 | 5.05 | 4.53 | |
| 55 | 18 | 72.22 | 0.39 | 5.49 | 7.68 | ||
| UBC 852 | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | 10 | 70.00 | 0.37 | 5.14 | 4.00 | ||
| UBC 856 | 55 | 6 | 83.33 | 0.32 | 5.03 | 2.60 | |
| 54 | 14 | 71.43 | 0.39 | 5.48 | 5.89 | ||
| UBC 858 | 50 | 11 | 54.55 | 0.37 | 4.50 | 3.29 | |
| UBC 859 | 55 | 4 | 50.00 | 0.28 | 3.13 | 0.71 | |
| UBC 860 | 52 | 4 | 75.00 | 0.32 | 4.95 | 1.33 | |
| UBC 861 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UBC 864 | 55 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | 14 | 85.71 | 0.38 | 6.82 | 6.89 | ||
| UBC 868 | 50 | 5 | 60.00 | 0.49 | 6.53 | 2.71 | |
| UBC 873 | 50 | 8 | 75.00 | 0.30 | 4.24 | 2.60 | |
| UBC 878 | 52 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| UBC 881 | 53 | 9 | 100.0 | 0.34 | 7.07 | 4.33 | |
| UBC 886 | 55 | 18 | 88.89 | 0.31 | 5.17 | 6.50 | |
| UBC 889 | 54 | 11 | 72.73 | 0.35 | 5.58 | 3.89 | |
| 54 | 14 | 92.86 | 0.43 | 8.90 | 9.22 | ||
| UBC 891 | 54 | 17 | 88.24 | 0.43 | 9.41 | 3.33 | |
| UBC 899 | 50 | 12 | 66.67 | 0.32 | 4.66 | 3.29 | |
| UBC 900 | 50 | 8 | 12.50 | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0.27 |
✓positive amplification;—no amplification
* ISSR highlighted in bold were selected for genetic studies in A. flaccida.
Fig 1Distribution of ISSR loci group in Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. populations from southern Brazil.
Fig 2Exclusive presence and exclusive absence of ISSR loci in Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. populations.
Genetic variability in populations of Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. sampled from grassy ecosystems in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil.
h: Nei’s genetic variability; I: Shannon genetic variability index; P%: percentage of polymorphic loci.
| Population | h | I | P% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marialva | 0.14 | 0.23 | 56.56 |
| Guarapuava | 0.18 | 0.28 | 62.44 |
| Porto Barreiro | 0.17 | 0.26 | 55.20 |
| Xanxerê | 0.16 | 0.25 | 57.01 |
| Campos Novos | 0.18 | 0.28 | 63.80 |
| Coxilha | 0.16 | 0.26 | 59.28 |
| Panambi | 0.20 | 0.31 | 63.35 |
| All | 0.23 | 0.37 | 100.0 |
Nei's genetic distance (below diagonal) obtained with the ISSR marker data and geographic distance (in km) (above diagonal) between the populations of Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. sampled from grassy ecosystems in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil.
| Populations | GU | CN | XA | PB | PA | CO | MA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guarapuava (GU) | 211 | 186 | 81 | 380 | 312 | 210 | |
| Campos Novos (CN) | 0.057 | 129 | 215 | 238 | 136 | 439 | |
| Xanxerê (XA) | 0.050 | 0.073 | 153 | 190 | 140 | 380 | |
| Porto Barreiro (PB) | 0.035 | 0.072 | 0.067 | 335 | 291 | 232 | |
| Panambi (PA) | 0.085 | 0.089 | 0.110 | 0.105 | 115 | 558 | |
| Coxilha (CO) | 0.106 | 0.081 | 0.107 | 0.120 | 0.136 | 520 | |
| Marialva (MA) | 0.058 | 0.065 | 0.052 | 0.075 | 0.114 | 0.109 |
Gene flow Nm (below) and G (above) among Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. populations sampled from grassy ecosystems in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil.
| Populations | GU | CA | XA | PO | PA | CO | MA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guarapuava (GU) | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.14 | |
| Campos Novos (CN) | 3.50 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.15 | |
| Xanxerê (XA) | 3.69 | 2.66 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.14 | |
| Porto Barreiro (PB) | 5.20 | 2.79 | 2.80 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.17 | |
| Panambi (PA) | 2.69 | 2.55 | 2.01 | 2.18 | 0.23 | 0.22 | |
| Coxilha (CO) | 1.95 | 2.46 | 1.81 | 2.71 | 1.69 | 0.23 | |
| Marialva (MA) | 3.08 | 2.78 | 3.18 | 2.42 | 1.85 | 1.68 |
Fig 3Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. populations from southern Brazil.
The circles indicate the area occupied by each population in the quadrants.
Fig 4Genetic groups of Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. established by Bayesian analysis using 190 ISSR loci.
Fig 5Dendrogram based on the Nei’s genetic distance of Achyrocline flaccida (Weinm.) DC. populations.
The Uruguay River valley delimited two population groups.
Fig 6Topography of the southern region of Brazil.
Highlight for the Uruguay River Valley (dark) and the sampling site of Achryrocline flaccid (Weinm.) DC. populations.